This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.
We compared modeled and observed streamflow trends from 1984 to 2016 using five statistical transfer models and one deterministic, distributed-parameter, process-based model, for 26 flow metrics at 502 basins in the United States that are minimally influenced by development. We also looked at a measure of overall model fit and average bias. A higher percentage of basins, for all models, had relatively low trend differences between modeled and observed mean/median flows than for very high or low flows such as the annual 1-day high and 7-day low flows. Mean-flow metrics also had the largest percentage of basins with relatively good overall model fit and low bias. The five statistical transfer models performed better at more basins than the process-based model. The overall model fit for all models, for mean and/or high flows, was correlated with one or more measures of basin precipitation or aridity. Our study and previous studies generally observed good model performance for high flows up to 90th or 95th percentile flows. However, we found model performance was substantially worse for more extreme flows, including 99th percentile and annual 1-day high flows, indicating the importance of including more extreme high flows in analyses of model performance.
Glenn A. Hodgkins; Robert W. Dudley; Amy M. Russell; Jacob H. Lafontaine. Comparing Trends in Modeled and Observed Streamflows at Minimally Altered Basins in the United States. Water 2020, 12, 1728 .
AMA StyleGlenn A. Hodgkins, Robert W. Dudley, Amy M. Russell, Jacob H. Lafontaine. Comparing Trends in Modeled and Observed Streamflows at Minimally Altered Basins in the United States. Water. 2020; 12 (6):1728.
Chicago/Turabian StyleGlenn A. Hodgkins; Robert W. Dudley; Amy M. Russell; Jacob H. Lafontaine. 2020. "Comparing Trends in Modeled and Observed Streamflows at Minimally Altered Basins in the United States." Water 12, no. 6: 1728.
The Eagle Creek watershed, a small subbasin (125 km2) within the Maumee River Basin, Ohio, was selected as a part of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) “Priority Watersheds” program to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) funded through GLRI at the field and watershed scales. The location and quantity of BMPs were obtained from the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service National Conservation Planning (NCP) database. A Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was built and calibrated for this predominantly agricultural Eagle Creek watershed, incorporating NCP BMPs and monitoring data at the watershed outlet, an edge-of-field (EOF), and tile monitoring sites. Input air temperature modifications were required to induce simulated tile flow to match monitoring data. Calibration heavily incorporated tile monitoring data to correctly proportion surface and subsurface flow, but calibration statistics were unsatisfactory at the EOF and tile monitoring sites. At the watershed outlet, satisfactory to very good calibration statistics were achieved over a 2-year calibration period, and satisfactory statistics were found in the 2-year validation period. SWAT fixes parameters controlling nutrients primarily at the watershed level; a refinement of these parameters at a smaller-scale could improve field-level calibration. Field-scale modeling results indicate that filter strips (FS) are the most effective single BMPs at reducing dissolved reactive phosphorus, and FS typically decreased sediment and nutrient yields when added to any other BMP or BMP combination. Cover crops were the most effective single, in-field practice by reducing nutrient loads over winter months. Watershed-scale results indicate BMPs can reduce sediment and nutrients, but reductions due to NCP BMPs in the Eagle Creek watershed for all water-quality constituents were less than 10%. Hypothetical scenarios simulated with increased BMP acreages indicate larger investments of the appropriate BMP or BMP combination can decrease watershed level loads.
Katherine R. Merriman; Prasad Daggupati; Raghavan Srinivasan; Chad Toussant; Amy M. Russell; Brett Hayhurst. Assessing the Impact of Site-Specific BMPs Using a Spatially Explicit, Field-Scale SWAT Model with Edge-of-Field and Tile Hydrology and Water-Quality Data in the Eagle Creek Watershed, Ohio. Water 2018, 10, 1299 .
AMA StyleKatherine R. Merriman, Prasad Daggupati, Raghavan Srinivasan, Chad Toussant, Amy M. Russell, Brett Hayhurst. Assessing the Impact of Site-Specific BMPs Using a Spatially Explicit, Field-Scale SWAT Model with Edge-of-Field and Tile Hydrology and Water-Quality Data in the Eagle Creek Watershed, Ohio. Water. 2018; 10 (10):1299.
Chicago/Turabian StyleKatherine R. Merriman; Prasad Daggupati; Raghavan Srinivasan; Chad Toussant; Amy M. Russell; Brett Hayhurst. 2018. "Assessing the Impact of Site-Specific BMPs Using a Spatially Explicit, Field-Scale SWAT Model with Edge-of-Field and Tile Hydrology and Water-Quality Data in the Eagle Creek Watershed, Ohio." Water 10, no. 10: 1299.
Subwatersheds within the Great Lakes “Priority Watersheds” were targeted by the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) to determine the effectiveness of the various best management practices (BMPs) from the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service National Conservation Planning (NCP) Database. A Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model is created for Alger Creek, a 50 km2 tributary watershed to the Saginaw River in Michigan. Monthly calibration yielded very good Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) ratings for flow, sediment, total phosphorus (TP), dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP), and total nitrogen (TN) (0.90, 0.79, 0.87, 0.88, and 0.77, respectively), and satisfactory NSE rating for nitrate (0.51). Two-year validation results in at least satisfactory NSE ratings for flow, sediment, TP, DRP, and TN (0.83, 0.54, 0.73, 0.53, and 0.60, respectively), and unsatisfactory NSE rating for nitrate (0.28). The model estimates the effect of BMPs at the field and watershed scales. At the field-scale, the most effective single practice at reducing sediment, TP, and DRP is no-tillage followed by cover crops (CC); CC are the most effective single practice at reducing nitrate. The most effective BMP combinations include filter strips, which can have a sizable effect on reducing sediment and phosphorus loads. At the watershed scale, model results indicate current NCP BMPs result in minimal sediment and nutrient reductions (<10%).
Katherine Merriman; Amy Russell; Cynthia Rachol; Prasad Daggupati; Raghavan Srinivasan; Brett Hayhurst; Todd Stuntebeck. Calibration of a Field-Scale Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model with Field Placement of Best Management Practices in Alger Creek, Michigan. Sustainability 2018, 10, 851 .
AMA StyleKatherine Merriman, Amy Russell, Cynthia Rachol, Prasad Daggupati, Raghavan Srinivasan, Brett Hayhurst, Todd Stuntebeck. Calibration of a Field-Scale Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model with Field Placement of Best Management Practices in Alger Creek, Michigan. Sustainability. 2018; 10 (3):851.
Chicago/Turabian StyleKatherine Merriman; Amy Russell; Cynthia Rachol; Prasad Daggupati; Raghavan Srinivasan; Brett Hayhurst; Todd Stuntebeck. 2018. "Calibration of a Field-Scale Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model with Field Placement of Best Management Practices in Alger Creek, Michigan." Sustainability 10, no. 3: 851.
Thomas M. Over; William H. Farmer; Amy M. Russell. Refinement of a regression-based method for prediction of flow-duration curves of daily streamflow in the conterminous United States. Scientific Investigations Report 2018, 1 .
AMA StyleThomas M. Over, William H. Farmer, Amy M. Russell. Refinement of a regression-based method for prediction of flow-duration curves of daily streamflow in the conterminous United States. Scientific Investigations Report. 2018; ():1.
Chicago/Turabian StyleThomas M. Over; William H. Farmer; Amy M. Russell. 2018. "Refinement of a regression-based method for prediction of flow-duration curves of daily streamflow in the conterminous United States." Scientific Investigations Report , no. : 1.