Valentin Dichev

Mr. Valentin Dichev


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 February 2020 in Reviews in the Neurosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VDValentin Dichev
Valentin Dichev
MKMaria Hristova Kazakova
Maria Hristova Kazakova
VSVictoria Sarafian
Victoria Sarafian
Neurodegenerative diseases comprise a large number of disorders with high impact on human health. Neurodegenerative processes are caused by various etiological factors and differ in their clinical presentation. Neuroinflammation is widely discussed as both a cause and a consequence in the manifestation of these disorders. The interplay between the two entities is considered as a major contributor to the ongoing disease progression. An attentive search and implementation of new and reliable markers specific for the processes of inflammation and degeneration is still needed. YKL-40 is a secreted glycoprotein produced by activated glial cells during neuroinflammation. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE), expressed mainly by neuronal cells, is a long-standing marker for neuronal damage. The aim of this review is to summarize, clarify, and evaluate the potential significance and relationship between YKL-40 and NSE as biomarkers in the monitoring and prognosis of a set of neurological diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, and multiple sclerosis. YKL-40 appears to be a more reliable biomarker in neurological diseases than NSE. The more prominent expression pattern of YKL-40 could be explained with the more obvious involvement of glial cells in pathological processes accompanying each neurodegenerative disease, whereas reduced NSE levels are likely related to low metabolic activity and increased death of neurons.

2 August 2019 in Rheumatology International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RKRositsa Valerieva Karalilova
Rositsa Valerieva Karalilova
MKMaria Kazakova
Maria Kazakova
Tanya SapundzhievaTanya Sapundzhieva
Tanya Sapundzhieva
VDValentin Dichev
Valentin Dichev
ZBZguro Batalov
Zguro Batalov
ABAnastas Batalov
Anastas Batalov

18 January 2021 in Modern Rheumatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VDValentin Dichev
Valentin Dichev
NMNikolay Hristov Mehterov
Nikolay Hristov Mehterov
MKMaria Hristova Kazakova
Maria Hristova Kazakova
RKRositsa Valerieva Karalilova
Rositsa Valerieva Karalilova
ABAnastas Zgurov Batalov
Anastas Zgurov Batalov
VSVictoria Stepan Sarafian
Victoria Stepan Sarafian
Objectives. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease with incompletely revealed etiology and pathophysiology. There are still no specific and r

31 December 2022 in Folia Medica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GVGergana Z. Vazheva
Gergana Z. Vazheva
LZLiliya G. Zisova
Liliya G. Zisova
EBElena A. Becheva
Elena A. Becheva
VCVeselin Chonov
Veselin Chonov
VDValentin Dichev
Valentin Dichev
VBVeselin T. Belovezhdov
Veselin T. Belovezhdov
Introduction: Onychomycosis is a frequent nail disorder, accounting for up to 50% of all nail problems. Treatment of onychomycosis is expensive and requires a long time of antifungal medications. Consequently, a proper and faster diagnosis is necessary. Especially for those patients with diabetes mellitus, where onychomycosis is among the most significant predictors of foot ulcer and possible severe complications.Aim: To compare the sensitivity, specificity, and turnaround time between direct microscopy, culture, histology, and real-time PCR. In addition, to compare the frequency and etiology of onychomycosis in patients with and without DM.Materials and methods: This study included 102 patients, divided into two groups. One group consisted of patients with diabetes mellitus and the other – without diabetes. Nail samples were collected and examined by direct KOH microscopic examination, culture, histology, and real-time PCR.Results: From the 102 patients with clinical onychomycosis, positive KOH was found in 38 (37.3%). Culture – 82 out of 102 samples (80.4%) were positive for dermatophytes, yeasts, and/or NDM. Positive histology samples were 32 (41.6%). The PCR was positive in 57 (55.9%) out of the 102. We discovered that there is no significant statistical difference in the etiology of the fungal infections between the two groups.Conclusions: All mycological investigations have their place in the diagnosis of onychomycosis. Direct microscopy, culture, and histology are useful methods for clinicians to diagnose and follow up the post-treatment period. The advantages of RT-PCR include obtaining results faster and accurately identifying fungi, thus becoming more valued in the diagnosis of OM.