Laurie Ann Boyer

Prof. Laurie Ann Boyer

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2013 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CKCarla A. Klattenhoff
Carla A. Klattenhoff
JSJohanna C. Scheuermann
Johanna C. Scheuermann
LSLauren Surface
Lauren Surface
RBRobert K. Bradley
Robert K. Bradley
PFPaul A. Fields
Paul A. Fields
LBLaurie Ann Boyer
Laurie Ann Boyer

1 September 2012 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJoseph A. Wamstad
Joseph A. Wamstad
JAJeffrey M. Alexander
Jeffrey M. Alexander
RTRebecca M. Truty
Rebecca M. Truty
ASAvanti Shrikumar
Avanti Shrikumar
FLFugen Li
Fugen Li
BBBenoit G. Bruneau
Benoit G. Bruneau

1 November 2008 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MCMenno P. Creyghton
Menno P. Creyghton
SMStyliani Markoulaki
Styliani Markoulaki
SLStuart S. Levine
Stuart S. Levine
JHJacob Hanna
Jacob Hanna
MLMichael A. Lodato
Michael A. Lodato
LBLaurie Ann Boyer
Laurie Ann Boyer

21 February 2013 in PLOS Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMichael A. Lodato
Michael A. Lodato
CNChristopher W. Ng
Christopher W. Ng
JWJoseph A. Wamstad
Joseph A. Wamstad
ACAlbert W. Cheng
Albert W. Cheng
KTKevin K. Thai
Kevin K. Thai
LBLaurie Ann Boyer
Laurie Ann Boyer
SOX2 is a master regulator of both pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and multipotent neural progenitor cells (NPCs); however, we currently lack a detailed understanding of how SOX2 controls these distinct stem cell populations. Here we show by genome-wide analysis that, while SOX2 bound to a distinct set of gene promoters in ESCs and NPCs, the majority of regions coincided with unique distal enhancer elements, important cis-acting regulators of tissue-specific gene expression programs. Notably, SOX2 bound the same consensus DNA motif in both cell types, suggesting that additional factors contribute to target specificity. We found that, similar to its association with OCT4 (Pou5f1) in ESCs, the related POU family member BRN2 (Pou3f2) co-occupied a large set of putative distal enhancers with SOX2 in NPCs. Forced expression of BRN2 in ESCs led to functional recruitment of SOX2 to a subset of NPC-specific targets and to precocious differentiation toward a neural-like state. Further analysis of the bound sequences revealed differences in the distances of SOX and POU peaks in the two cell types and identified motifs for additional transcription factors. Together, these data suggest that SOX2 controls a larger network of genes than previously anticipated through binding of distal enhancers and that transitions in POU partner factors may control tissue-specific transcriptional programs. Our findings have important implications for understanding lineage specification and somatic cell reprogramming, where SOX2, OCT4, and BRN2 have been shown to be key factors. In mammals, a few thousand transcription factors regulate the differential expression of more than 20,000 genes to specify ∼200 functionally distinct cell types during development. How this is accomplished has been a major focus of biology. Transcription factors bind non-coding DNA regulatory elements, including proximal promoters and distal enhancers, to control gene expression. Emerging evidence indicates that transcription factor binding at distal enhancers plays an important role in the establishment of tissue-specific gene expression programs during development. Further, combinatorial binding among groups of transcription factors can further increase the diversity and specificity of regulatory modules. Here, we report the genome-wide binding profile of the HMG-box containing transcription factor SOX2 in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and neural progenitor cells (NPCs), and we show that SOX2 occupied a distinct set of binding sites with POU homeodomain family members, OCT4 in ESCs and BRN2 in NPCs. Thus, transitions in SOX2-POU partners may control tissue-specific gene networks. Ultimately, a global analysis detailing the combinatorial binding of transcription factors across all tissues is critical to understand cell fate specification in the context of the complex mammalian genome.

12 November 2021 in Science Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JLJette Lengefeld
Jette Lengefeld
CCChia-Wei Cheng
Chia-Wei Cheng
PMPema Maretich
Pema Maretich
MBMarguerite Blair
Marguerite Blair
HHHannah Hagen
Hannah Hagen
AAAngelika Amon
Angelika Amon
Small cell size preserves the function of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs); HSC enlargement during aging causes their dysfunction.

27 February 2015 in Circulation Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
COCaitlin C. O’mEara
Caitlin C. O’mEara
JWJoseph A. Wamstad
Joseph A. Wamstad
RGRachel A. Gladstone
Rachel A. Gladstone
GFGregory M. Fomovsky
Gregory M. Fomovsky
VBVincent L. Butty
Vincent L. Butty
RLRichard T. Lee
Richard T. Lee
Rationale:: Neonatal mice have the capacity to regenerate their hearts in response to injury, but this potential is lost after the first week of life. The transcriptional changes that underpin mammalian cardiac regeneration have not been fully characterized at the molecular level. Objective:: The objectives of our study were to determine whether myocytes revert the transcriptional phenotype to a less differentiated state during regeneration and to systematically interrogate the transcriptional data to identify and validate potential regulators of this process. Methods and Results:: We derived a core transcriptional signature of injury-induced cardiac myocyte (CM) regeneration in mouse by comparing global transcriptional programs in a dynamic model of in vitro and in vivo CM differentiation, in vitro CM explant model, as well as a neonatal heart resection model. The regenerating mouse heart revealed a transcriptional reversion of CM differentiation processes, including reactivation of latent developmental programs similar to those observed during destabilization of a mature CM phenotype in the explant model. We identified potential upstream regulators of the core network, including interleukin 13, which induced CM cell cycle entry and STAT6/STAT3 signaling in vitro. We demonstrate that STAT3/periostin and STAT6 signaling are critical mediators of interleukin 13 signaling in CMs. These downstream signaling molecules are also modulated in the regenerating mouse heart. Conclusions:: Our work reveals new insights into the transcriptional regulation of mammalian cardiac regeneration and provides the founding circuitry for identifying potential regulators for stimulating heart regeneration.