Ebru Kılıç

Dr. Ebru Kılıç


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 January 2018 in Libyan Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ÖŞÖmer Fatih Şahin
Ömer Fatih Şahin
EKEbru Kılıç
Ebru Kılıç
YAYakup Aksoy
Yakup Aksoy
AKAyhan Kaydu
Ayhan Kaydu
EGErhan Gökçek
Erhan Gökçek
Stellate ganglion blockage (SGB) is a method used for treating Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP). This study primarily aimed to determine whether the perfusion index (PI) can be used an alternative to Horner’s signs in evaluating the efficacy of SGB in patients diagnosed with RP. In a total of 40 patients, aged 18–65 years and diagnosed with primary RP, SGB was applied for 5 days on the same side with the 2-finger method, using 6 mL of 5% levobupivacaine at the 7th cervical vertebra level. The PI values were recorded from the distal end of the 2nd finger of the upper extremity on the side applied with the block at baseline and at 5, 15, 30, 60 and 120 min. The onset time of Horner findings was recorded. The PI values and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores were recorded pre-treatment and after 2 weeks.When the PI values of the 40 patients were examined, a 62.7% increase was observed from baseline to the first session at 5 min (p < 0.05). When all sessions were evaluated, a statistically significant increase was determined in the PI values measured at 5, 15, 30, 60 and 120 min compared with the baseline PI values. There was a statistically significant decrease in the post-treatment VAS pain scores and a statistically significant increase in the post-treatment PI values (p < 0.05). By eliminating peripheral vasospasm with the application of SGB in patients with RP, the distal artery blood flow and PI are increased. PI measurement is a more objective method and therefore could be used as an alternative to Horner findings in evaluating the success of SGB. PI is a non-invasive and simple measurement and also an earlier indicator in evaluating the success of SGB than Horner’s signs.

1 January 2019 in Northern Clinics of Istanbul
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EKEbru Kılıç
Ebru Kılıç
Current literature covers limited data on the safety of sedation in advanced endoscopic procedures in obese patients. The present study aims to evaluate the association between obesity and the frequency of sedation-related complications in patients who were undergoing advanced endoscopic procedures. A retrospective chart analysis of 1172 consecutive patients, meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria for this study and undergoing intravenous ketamine-propofol (ketofol) sedation for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures were evaluated. The patients were classified into three groups according to their body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2). Group I comprised patients with a BMI between 25 and 30, group II with a BMI between 30 and 35, and group III with a BMI between 35-40. The sedation-related outcomes in the form of adverse events, and airway interventions were compared between the groups. For analysis, out of the 1172 available records, 289 patients had a BMI between 35-40 and were predominantly male patients. The total adverse events were more common in obese patients, with apnea (in 5.5% patients in group I, 5.7% in group II, 22.8% in group III p<0.000), oxygen desaturation (in 7.7% patients in group I, 9.4% in group II, and 27.7% in group III p<0.000), and airway obstruction (in 4.9% patients in group I, 5.4% in group II, 22.8% in group III, p<0.000). Moreover, the obese patients more frequently required airway interventions, including airway placement, suctioning and bag-mask ventilation. Higher BMI was associated with an increased frequency of sedation-related complications. However, we concluded that ketofol sedation regimen could be used safely in obese patients during advanced endoscopic procedures by skilled anesthesia providers.

1 January 2018 in Libyan Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EKEbru Kılıç
Ebru Kılıç
GAGaye Aydın
Gaye Aydın
Background: We evaluated the effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine during spinal anesthesia on hemodynamics, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, sedpain, and compared them with those of saline infusion. Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II cases were randomly divided into two groups. Patients were connected to the monitor after premedication, and spinal anesthesia was administered. Sensory and motor blockades were assessed using pinprick test and Bromage scale, respectively. Group I received dexmedetomidine infusion and Group II received saline infusion. Throughout the infusion process, hemodynamic data, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, sedation, pain, Bromage score, amnesia, bispectral index, and side effects were recorded. Postoperative hemodynamic measurements, oxygen saturation, sedation, pain scores were obtained. Sedation and pain were evaluated using the Ramsay and visual analog scales, respectively. Analgesics were administered in cases with high scores on the visual analog scale. Postoperative analgesic consumption, side effects, treatments were recorded. No significant differences were found between the groups with respect to oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, pain, and side effects in the intraoperative period. Time to onset of sensorial block, maximum sensorial block, onset of motor block, and maximum motor block; bispectral index values; and apex heartbeat until 80 min of infusion, systolic arterial blood pressure until 90 min, and diastolic arterial blood pressure until 50 min were lower, whereas amnesia and sedation levels were higher in dexmedetomidine group. Postoperative pain and analgesic requirement were not different. Apex heartbeat at 15 min and systolic arterial blood pressure at 30 min were lower and sedation scores were higher in the dexmedetomidine infusion group. We demonstrated dexmedetomidine infusion had a hemodynamic depressant effect intraoperatively whereas it had no significant effect on peripheral oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, visual analog scale scores, and side effects. Dexmedetomidine infusion enhanced motor and sensory blockade quality and induced amnesia and sedation.

1 June 2019 in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EKEbru Kılıç
Ebru Kılıç
KRKahraman Resul
Kahraman Resul
Background and aim: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) requires moderate-to-deep conscious sedation. Combinations of ketamine and propofol (ketofol) and of midazolam and meperidine were analyzed using the bispectral index (BIS). There is no research on the use of ketofol on very elderly patients. The aim of this study is to use BIS and offer insight into the use and safety of ketofol sedation for oldest old patients undergoing ERCP. Materials and methods: For the ERCP procedure, 168 patients aged 85+ years were enrolled in a 2-year retrospective single center study. Seventy-five patients received midazolam-meperidine (MM) sedation in 2016, while 75 patients received ketofol (KP) sedation in 2018. The two groups were compared for patient data, procedure duration, Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS), heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and pulse oximetry (SpO2), BIS, facial pain score (FPS), time to achieve BIS, recovery time, and complications. The total amount of rescue medication was recorded. Results: The two groups did not differ by patient data or procedure duration (p>0.05). Group KP had significantly higher systolic and diastolic BP, HR, and SpO2 values and lower BIS scores than Group MM (p=0.0001). The two groups did not differ by time to achieve BIS scores (p>0.05). Group KP had significantly fewer complications and a shorter recovery time than Group MM (p<0.001). Conclusion: Ketofol induced sedation results in more stable vital signs and fewer complications than the midazolam-meperidine sedation regimen during ERCP in oldest old patients, indicating that ketofol can be an alternative to midazolam-meperidine.

1 January 2018 in Anesthesia: Essays and Researches
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EKEbru Kılıç
Ebru Kılıç
FSFikret Salik
Fikret Salik
HAHakan Akelma
Hakan Akelma
AGAbdülmenap Güzel
Abdülmenap Güzel
Aim: Spinal anesthesia is a widely used procedure in modern anesthesia. Although it is a reliable and frequently used anesthetic procedure, it involves complications, including postdural puncture headache caused by arachnoid punctured, which significantly affects postoperative well-being. In this study, we aimed to observe headache frequency with 26-G Quincke spinal needle in either transverse or sagittal planes. Materials and Methods: One hundred patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists status classes I and II who were scheduled for elective cesarean delivery with no contraindications for performing spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups: Group I (transverse n = 50) and Group II (sagittal n = 50). Spinal anesthesia was performed with a 26-G Quincke needle, using 1.5–2.0 ml 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine. The anesthesiologists' experience, number of attempts for spinal anesthesia, volume of fluid administered preoperatively and intraoperatively, intervertebral space where spinal anesthesia was administered, and patient movements during the attempts were recorded. Mean arterial pressure and peak heart rates were recorded for 60 min intraoperatively and postoperatively. Headache and back pain complications were observed for 1 week postoperatively. Chi-square tests and statistical comparisons of the rates (statistical significance, P < 0.05) were used for assessments. Results and Conclusions: No significant differences were observed with respect to age, height, weight, headache, or incidence of back pain. No significant differences were observed for the number of spinal attempts, intervertebral space where spinal anesthesia was administered, experience of the anesthesiologists, patient movements during the attempts, volumes of fluid administered preoperatively and intraoperatively, or low back pain incidence. Significant reductions in mean arterial pressure were observed between groups after 10, 15, 30, 40, and 50 min. No significant differences were observed in headache or back pain frequency with 26-G Quincke spinal needle in either transverse or sagittal planes. Hypotension was frequently observed in the transverse group.

1 January 2018 in Anesthesia: Essays and Researches
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EKEbru Kılıç
Ebru Kılıç
MAMehmet Erdem Akcay
Mehmet Erdem Akcay
MAMehmet Salim Akdemir
Mehmet Salim Akdemir
Background: In this prospective, randomized study, we evaluated the intranasal administration of Midazolam ketamine combination, midazolam, and ketamine in premedication for children. Material and Methods: We studied 60 American Society of Anesthesiology physical status Classes I and II children aged between 1 and 10 years undergoing ear nose throat operations. All cases were premedicated 15 min before operation with intranasal administration of 0.2 mg/kg midazolam in Group M, 5 mg/kg Ketamine in Group K, and 0.1 mg/kg Midazolam + 3 mg/kg ketamine in Group MK. Patients were evaluated for sedation, anxiety scores, respiratory, and hemodynamic effects before premedication, 5 min interval between induction and postoperative period. Results: There was no difference with respect to age, sex, weight, the duration of the operation, and for mask tolerance. Sedation scores were significantly higher in Group MK. There was no statistically difference between the groups for heart rate, oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate. Conclusion: We concluded that intranasal MK combination provides sufficient sedation, comfortable anesthesia induction with postoperative recovery for pediatric premedication.