Arbi Ben Abdallah

Dr. Arbi Ben Abdallah


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 September 2024 in British Journal of Anaesthesia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BFBradley A. Fritz
Bradley A. Fritz
CKChristopher R. King
Christopher R. King
MAMohamed Abdelhack
Mohamed Abdelhack
YCYixin Chen
Yixin Chen
AKAlex Kronzer
Alex Kronzer
MAMichael S. Avidan
Michael S. Avidan

24 March 2022 in Pain
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
COChioma U. Odozor
Chioma U. Odozor
TKThomas Kannampallil
Thomas Kannampallil
AAArbi Ben Abdallah
Arbi Ben Abdallah
KRKristen Roles
Kristen Roles
CBCarrie Burk
Carrie Burk
SHSimon Haroutounian
Simon Haroutounian
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection can cause neurological sequelae after the resolution of symptomatic COVID-19 illness, but the occurrence of peripheral neuropathy symptoms and cranial nerve dysfunction is unknown. This study aimed to characterize the occurrence and severity of pain and peripheral neuropathy symptoms in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. An observational cohort study included adults tested for a SARS-CoV-2 infection at an academic medical center (assigned as CV+ or control, based on test results). Thirty to 90 days after the index SARS-CoV-2 test, patients completed a web-based questionnaire assessing pain, peripheral neuropathy-related sensory symptoms, and symptoms in the distribution of cranial nerves (current symptoms, symptoms at testing and 2 weeks thereafter). Univariate analyses compared the outcomes between the groups. Multivariable analysis was used to determine the odds for neuropathy symptoms after adjusting for key baseline variables. A total of 1556 participants were included: 542 CV+ patients and 1014 control subjects. CV+ patients reported a higher occurrence of peripheral neuropathy symptoms in the extremities anytime within 90 days postinfection (28.8% vs 12.9%, odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval] = 2.72 [2.10-3.54]), as well as such symptoms persisting up to 90 days after infection (6.1% vs 1.9%, OR = 3.39 [1.91-6.03]). The occurrence of pain in the extremities was higher in the CV+ group (24.2% vs 9.8%, OR = 2.95 [2.21-3.91]). SARS-CoV-2 infection was also associated with higher occurrence of peripheral neuropathy symptoms, after adjusting for the history of chronic pain and neuropathy (OR = 3.19 [2.37-4.29]). The results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection was independently associated with an increased risk of pain and peripheral neuropathy symptoms.

13 July 2010 in AIDS and Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SJSharon D. Johnson
Sharon D. Johnson
Linda B CottlerLinda B Cottler
Linda B Cottler
AAArbi Ben Abdallah
Arbi Ben Abdallah
COCatina Callahan O’lEary
Catina Callahan O’lEary
This study examines whether substance using women exposed to a lifetime sexual trauma (n = 457) are distinguishable from substance using women exposed to non-sexual trauma (n = 275) in terms of demographics, psychopathology and high-risk sexual behaviors. Baseline data were collected from out-of-treatment substance using women enrolled in an HIV prevention study. Logistic regression analyses revealed that when demographics, psychopathology and lifetime indicators of sexual risk were assessed simultaneously, poor health, depression, antisocial personality disorder and lifetime sex-trading were associated with sexual trauma exposure. When these significant factors were controlled, the experience of sexual trauma predicted recent (past 4 month) high risk sexual behaviors such as higher than average sexual partners. Treatment efforts with women who have experienced a sexual trauma may be enhanced by the inclusion of assessments of physical and mental health needs as well as sexual risk awareness training.

29 June 2021 in BMJ Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AHAlex Hincker
Alex Hincker
JNJacob Nadler
Jacob Nadler
SKSuzanne Karan
Suzanne Karan
ECEbony Carter
Ebony Carter
SPShay Porat
Shay Porat
YGYehuda Ginosar
Yehuda Ginosar
Introduction Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a major contributor to fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality with intrauterine, neonatal and lifelong complications. This study explores maternal obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) as a potentially modifiable risk factor for FGR. We hypothesise that, in pregnancies complicated by FGR, treating mothers who have OSA using positive airway pressure (PAP) will improve birth weight and neonatal outcomes. Methods and analysis The Sleep Apnea and Fetal Growth Restriction study is a prospective, block-randomised, single-blinded, multicentre, pragmatic controlled trial. We enrol pregnant women aged 18–50, between 22 and 31 weeks of gestation, with established FGR based on second trimester ultrasound, who do not have other prespecified known causes of FGR (such as congenital anomalies or intrauterine infection). In stage 1, participants are screened by questionnaire for OSA risk. If OSA risk is identified, participants proceed to stage 2, where they undergo home sleep apnoea testing. Participants are determined to have OSA if they have an apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥5 (if the oxygen desaturation index (ODI) is also ≥5) or if they have an AHI ≥10 (even if the ODI is <5). These participants proceed to stage 3, where they are randomised to nightly treatment with PAP or no PAP (standard care control), which is maintained until delivery. The primary outcome is unadjusted birth weight; secondary outcomes include fetal growth velocity on ultrasound, enrolment-to-delivery interval, gestational age at delivery, birth weight corrected for gestational age, stillbirth, Apgar score, rate of admission to higher levels of care (neonatal intensive care unit or special care nursery) and length of neonatal stay. These outcomes are compared between PAP and control using intention-to-treat analysis. Ethics and dissemination This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Boards at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri; Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem; and the University of Rochester, New York. Recruitment began in Washington University in November 2019 but stopped from March to November 2020 due to COVID-19. Recruitment began in Hadassah Hebrew University in March 2021, and in the University of Rochester in May 2021. Dissemination plans include presentations at scientific conferences and scientific publications. Trial registration number NCT04084990.

4 January 2025 in British Journal of Anaesthesia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CKChristopher R. King
Christopher R. King
BFBradley A. Fritz
Bradley A. Fritz
SGStephen H. Gregory
Stephen H. Gregory
TBThaddeus P. Budelier
Thaddeus P. Budelier
AAArbi Ben Abdallah
Arbi Ben Abdallah
TKThomas Kannampallil
Thomas Kannampallil
Telemedicine may help improve care quality and patient outcomes. Telemedicine for intraoperative decision support has not been rigorously studied. This was a single-centre randomised clinical trial of unselected adult surgical patients. Patients were randomised to receive usual care or decision support from a telemedicine service, which provided real-time recommendations to intraoperative anaesthesia clinicians based on case reviews and physiological alerts. ORs were randomised 1:1. The co-primary outcomes were 30-day all-cause mortality, respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, and delirium in the intensive care unit, analysed by intention to treat. Between July 1, 2019, and January 31, 2023, a total of 35,302 patients were randomised to receive telemedicine support, with 36,625 receiving usual care. Telemedicine clinicians provided review in 11,812/35,302 cases, with alerts delivered to 2044/35,302 patients. Telemedicine support had no effect on any of the co-primary outcomes. Within 30 days, 630/35,302 (1.8%) patients randomised to telemedicine died within 30 days, compared with 649/36,625 (1.8%) receiving usual care (relative risk [RR]1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.16, P=0.98). Telemedicine support did not alter postoperative respiratory failure [telemedicine 1071/33,996 (3.2%) vs usual care 1130/35,236 (3.2%), RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.88-1.09, P=0.98], acute kidney injury [telemedicine 2316/33 251 (7.0%) vs usual care 2432/34,441 (7.1%); RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.92-1.06, P=0.98], or delirium [telemedicine 1264/3873 (32.6%) vs usual care 1298/4044 (32.1%), RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.94-1.10, P=0.98]. In this large randomised clinical trial, intraoperative telemedicine decision support using real-time alerts and case reviews had no impact on adverse postoperative outcomes. NCT03923699.

27 May 2025 in Pain Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HNHadas Nahman-Averbuch
Hadas Nahman-Averbuch
GBGourav Bnanerjee
Gourav Bnanerjee
JBJoel Brown
Joel Brown
AMAlana McMichael
Alana McMichael
AAArbi Ben Abdallah
Arbi Ben Abdallah
JAJacob AuBuchon
Jacob AuBuchon
Introduction: Puberty is a critical developmental period during which changes in pain sensitivity are observed. Previous studies found that older and more mature adolescents have lower experimental pain sensitivity. However, it is unclear whether the differences in pain sensitivity are due to age or the pubertal maturation effect. Objectives: This observational study examined the relationships between the pubertal maturation stage, age, and experimental pain sensitivity in healthy girls. Methods: Healthy adolescent girls (n = 52, mean age 12.0 ± 1.4 years) completed the Pubertal Developmental Scale (PDS) to assess their pubertal stage. In addition, they completed a comprehensive quantitative sensory testing session, including pain thresholds, pain ratings to noxious stimuli, and pain modulation tests. Separate regression models were performed to assess the effect of pubertal maturation and age on experimental pain sensitivity as well as differences in experimental pain sensitivity between girls in different subjective self-perceived pubertal timing relative to peers. Results: No relationships were found between the PDS score and experimental pain sensitivity; however, age was significantly related to cold pain tolerance (P = 0.030). In addition, to differentiate between puberty and age, experimental pain sensitivity was compared in a subsample of girls of the same age but at different pubertal stages, and no differences in experimental pain sensitivity were observed. No differences were also found when comparing girls who mature early, same, or late relative to their peers. Conclusion: Puberty and age may have no effect on experimental pain sensitivity in healthy girls.