Aim. To investigate the relation between malnutrition and nosocomial infections (NI) in hospitalized cancer patients. Methods. This observational, cross-sectional, noninterventional, descriptive study was conducted in a 500-bed university hospital in Valencia (Spain). Adult cancer patients admitted to the oncology ward were consecutively enrolled regardless of their nutritional status between November 2019 and March 2020. Patients were nutritionally assessed 24 to 48 hours after admission. Body weight, height and BMI, body composition through measurement of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and muscle strength and functionality using hand grip strength (HGS) were prospectively collected. The diagnosis of malnutrition and sarcopenia was assessed using the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria and the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) criteria, respectively. Patients were followed up during their hospital stay or outpatient oncology visits to identify possible NI. Results. A total of 107 patients were included in this study (mean age 66 years; 66.4% were men). The most frequent reason for admission was cancer treatment (19.6%), followed by infections (18.7%) and digestive tract symptoms (18.7%). Overall, 77.5% (83/107) of the patients were malnourished at admission according to the GLIM criteria, while 52.3% (56/107) were sarcopenic. Nosocomial infections (NI) were significantly more frequent in malnourished (52.1%; 25/48) and severely malnourished (42.1%; 8/19) patients, compared with well-nourished patients without malnutrition (25%; 10/40; ). The mean length of hospital stay was 13.9 days, significantly longer in patients with an NI compared to those without infections (18.6 vs. 10.8 days, ). Conclusion. This study evidenced the need to implement a routine protocol for the nutritional assessment and support of cancer patients at risk of malnutrition and sarcopenia to reduce the risk of NI during their hospital stay.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between blood redox status, dose and antioxidant dietary intake of different hospital staff groups exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation (LDIR) (Interventional Radiology and Cardiology, Radiation Oncology, and Nuclear Medicine) and non-exposed. Personal dose equivalent (from last year and cumulative), plasma antioxidant markers (total antioxidant capacity, extracellular superoxide dismutase activity, and glutathione/oxidized glutathione ratio), oxidative stress markers (nitrites and nitrates, and lipid peroxidation) and dietary intake (antioxidant capacity using ORAC values) were collected and analyzed from 28 non-exposed healthcare workers and 42 healthcare workers exposed to LDIR. Hospital staff exposed to LDIR presented a redox imbalance in blood that seems to correlate with dose. Workers from the Nuclear Medicine Unit were the most affected group with the lowest value of plasma antioxidant response and the highest value of plasma thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, TBARS (indicator of lipid peroxidation) of all four groups. Cumulative personal dose equivalent positively correlated with nitrites and negatively correlated with total antioxidant capacity in blood. The diet of healthcare workers from Nuclear Medicine Unit had higher ORAC values than the diet of non-exposed. Therefore, occupational exposure to LDIR, especially for the Nuclear Medicine Unit, seems to produce an imbalanced redox status in blood that would correlate with cumulative personal dose equivalent.

Guidelines for bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) recommend fasting before measurements, but how it affects the outcomes is unclear. This descriptive, before-and-after study examines the effect of fasting on BIA results and its impact on the diagnosis of malnutrition in hospitalized cancer patients. Fifty-three oncology patients (admitted in January-March 2020) were consecutively enrolled regardless of their nutritional status. Patients were assessed by the same dietician 24-48 h after admission, following the usual clinical practice. The measurements were taken after 12-h fasting (fasting state) and 60-90 min after breakfast (non-fasting state). Bioimpedance parameters (resistance [R], reactance [Xc], phase angle [PA]) and body composition indices (free-fat mass index [FFMI] and appendicular skeletal muscle index [ASMI]) were calculated. On average, R values did not significantly differ between fasting and non-fasting states (mean difference: +1.82 & OHM;; p = 0.64). The non-fasting Xc and PA were reduced (mean differences: -1.55 & OHM;, p = 0.93 and 0.09 & DEG;, p = 0.82, respectively). Fasting and non-fasting FFMI and ASMI were similar (mean differences: -0.13 kg/m(2) (p = 0.5) and -0.10 kg/m(2) (p not calculated)). These results suggest that BIA does not require fasting, facilitating its routine use in hospitalized cancer patients.

Background: Preoperative sarcopenia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. The assessment of muscle mass is crucial in identifying at-risk patients, but standard imaging methods like computed tomography (CT) scans require significant resources. Functional tests, such as the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, may serve as simple and effective alternatives for sarcopenia screening. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of the TUG test in predicting preoperative sarcopenia in patients scheduled for CRC surgery. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary colorectal unit from January 2022 to June 2023. Patients underwent a prehabilitation assessment, including the TUG test, four weeks before surgery. Sarcopenia was diagnosed based on reduced muscle mass measured at the third lumbar vertebra on CT images. Statistical analyses included the sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of the TUG test in predicting sarcopenia. Results: The study included 199 CRC patients (58.3% male, mean age 71.76 ± 10.42 years). Sarcopenia was present in 48.7% of patients. The mean TUG test length was 12.52 ± 7.95 s. A TUG test time of ≥10.19 s predicted sarcopenia with 70.1% sensitivity, 75.5% specificity, and an overall accuracy of 72.9% (95% CI = 0.660–0.790). Conclusions: The TUG test is a reliable, simple, and non-invasive tool for identifying sarcopenia in patients scheduled for colorectal cancer surgery, reducing reliance on CT scans. Early detection allows for timely interventions, improving surgical outcomes and overall patient prognosis.

Purpose: the main purpose of this study was to diagnose pre-sarcopenia in cancer patients who had lack of computed tomography (CT) abdominal images, with a newly discovered method based on cervical images. Material and methods: a sample of 37 patients with either lung cancer or a cancer that affected the upper digestive system underwent radiotherapy computed simulation which included measurements at C3 and L3 regions. Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) and skeletal muscle index (SMI) were determined by Hounsfield units and compared in both regions. Pre-sarcopenia was identified according to the cut-points currently established: <= 41 cm(2)/m(2) in females, <= 43 cm(2)/m(2) in males with a BMI <= 25 kg/m(2), and <= 53 cm(2)/m(2) in males with a BMI > 25 kg/m(2). Results: the correlation of SMM and SMI between the C3 and L3 regions was R-2 = 0.876 and R-2 = 0.805, respectively. Moreover, there was a positive association (86.49%) in terms of the diagnosis of pre-sarcopenia according to both regions. In total, eleven pre-sarcopenic patients (29.37%) were identified; three of them being overweight (27.27%) and two of them being obese (18.18%). Conclusion: a single sectional cross at the level of C3 can be used for the diagnosis of pre-sarcopenia. This new method avoids unnecessary irradiation, saves hospital costs and detects malnutrition before starting radiotherapy treatment in cancer patients who have lack of CT abdominal imaging.

Introduction: malnutrition is a common problem in cancer patients that worsens during hospitalization and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, and impaired quality of life.Objectives: to describe the effect of implementing a nutritional assessment and support protocol on the nutritional status of hospitalized cancer patients.Methods: a prospective, cross-sectional, non-controlled, quasi-experimental study in cancer patients admitted to an oncology service consecu-tively regardless of their nutritional status between September 2019 and March 2020. Anthropometric parameters, body composition, and hand grip strength were measured at admission and discharge. The percentage of patients with malnutrition, dynapenia, and sarcopenia at admission and discharge was calculated.Results: a total of 90 cancer patients participated in this study (mean age: 66 years, 67.8 % men); 33.2 % of the patients had a tumor in the gastrointestinal tract and 73.3 % of the patients were in stage IV; 95 % required nutritional support (nutritional supplementation, enteral nutrition or parenteral nutrition). After the nutritional intervention, no differences were found in the anthropometric parameters with a mean weight loss of 0.1, although improvements in body composition were observed. The percentage of malnourished patients remained stable on admission and discharge regardless of the criteria used.Conclusions: the implementation of a protocol for assessment and nutritional support at admission in cancer patients may help prevent or delay the worsening of their nutritional status during hospital stay.