Background and aims: Rheumatic diseases are chronic, progressive conditions associated with severe pain, joint damage, disability, and even death. Healthcare interventions play a critical role in symptom management, patient education, and adherence to treatment plans. This study evaluates the role of healthcare interventions in the management of patients with rheumatic diseases, focusing on pain management, functional rehabilitation, patient education, and multidisciplinary collaboration. In addition, barriers to optimal care and potential solutions, including digital health technologies, are explored. Materials and methods: We conducted a narrative review of the scientific literature. Studies published between 2014 and 2025 were selected from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Elsevier, Springer, Frontiers, and Wiley Online Library. Key areas of review included nurse-led pain management, education programs, and the impact of interdisciplinary care on patient outcomes. Results: Nursing interventions significantly improve pain control, treatment adherence, and self-management skills in patients with rheumatic diseases. Multidisciplinary approaches improve functional rehabilitation and increase quality of life in patients with rheumatic conditions. However, barriers such as insufficient health care resources, lack of patient awareness, and disparities in the availability of services hinder effective care delivery. Conclusions: A structured, multidisciplinary approach integrating healthcare interventions, digital health solutions, and patient-centered education is essential to optimize the management of rheumatic diseases. Future research should focus on improving access to non-pharmacological therapies and standardizing healthcare protocols for better patient outcomes.

Background/Objectives: Human leukocyte antigen B27 (HLA-B27) is a genetic marker strongly associated with various inflammatory rheumatic diseases, particularly those within the spondyloarthritis spectrum. Its presence influences disease onset, clinical severity, and therapeutic strategies. However, comparative data between HLA-B*27-positive and -negative patients, especially in Eastern European populations, remain limited. The study aimed to investigate the clinical, paraclinical, and psychosocial differences between HLA-B*27-positive and -negative individuals diagnosed with rheumatic diseases, in order to better understand the implications of HLA-B27 status on disease expression and patient quality of life. Methods: A cross-sectional, observational study was conducted between June 2023 and December 2024 at the Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children “Sf Ioan” in Galati, Romania, in collaboration with “Dunarea de Jos” University. Fifty adult patients with various rheumatic conditions were enrolled and stratified into HLA-B*27-positive (n = 22) and -negative (n = 28) groups. Data collection included clinical evaluations, laboratory biomarkers (CRP = C-reactive protein; ESR = erythrocyte sedimentation rate), and a structured quality-of-life questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v27. Results: HLA-B*27-positive patients were significantly younger (mean age 46.00 vs. 55.07 years, p = 0.018) and had higher CRP levels (>1 mg/dL in 53.33% vs. 0%, p = 0.001). Ankylosing spondylitis was more prevalent in this group (22.73% vs. 3.57%, p = 0.039). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was more frequently used (68.18% vs. 39.29%, p = 0.042), indicating greater suspicion of axial involvement. HLA-B27-positive patients also reported higher perceived stress (mean score 2.41 vs. 1.21, p < 0.001). Conclusions: HLA-B*27 positivity is associated with earlier disease onset, increased systemic inflammation, greater axial involvement, and higher psychological stress. These findings emphasise the need for personalised, multidisciplinary care that integrates both medical and psychological support for HLA-B*27-positive patients.

Background: Respiratory viral infections remain a major cause of morbidity and hospitalization in children. The increased use of multiplex molecular assays has improved the detection of simultaneous viral pathogens, raising questions about the clinical relevance of pediatric viral co-infections. Objective: The aim of this study is to synthesize recent evidence on respiratory viral co-infections in children, focusing on clinical severity, healthcare burden, mechanisms, and interpretation of multiplex detections. Methods: This narrative review included studies published between 1 January 2022 and 30 September 2025, identified through PubMed and Web of Science. Eligible studies involved children and adolescents (0–18 years) with laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral co-infections, mainly detected by multiplex PCR. Evidence was synthesized qualitatively across severity, neutral or inconsistent impact, viral interference, and post-acute implications. Results: Forty-five studies were included. The most frequently reported viruses were respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), rhinovirus, adenovirus, influenza virus, and human metapneumovirus (HMPV). Clinical impact was heterogeneous and depended more on specific viral pairings and host factors than on the number of detected viruses. RSV-containing combinations, particularly with HMPV, adenovirus, or rhinovirus, were more often linked to increased respiratory burden, whereas some rhinovirus-associated combinations appeared compatible with viral interference. Conclusions: Pediatric respiratory viral co-infection is clinically relevant but context-dependent. Multiplex results should be interpreted together with clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings.

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases associated with impaired quality of life, persistent disease burden, and increased healthcare utilization. Treatment adherence and psychosocial factors may influence outcomes, but their longitudinal associations in real-world hospitalized populations remain insufficiently characterized. Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective, mid-term longitudinal observational study including 50 adults with RA or AS who experienced repeated hospitalizations over a four-year period. The final dataset comprised 196 hospitalization episodes analyzed as repeated observations nested within individual patients. Disease activity was assessed using DAS28 in RA and ASDAS and/or BASDAI in AS, according to data availability and routine clinical practice. Treatment adherence, quality of life, anxiety, social isolation, patient–provider communication, dietary support, inflammatory markers, and hospitalization-related outcomes were extracted from medical records and structured inpatient assessments. Linear mixed-effects models were used for continuous outcomes, and ordinal mixed-effects models were used for ordered categorical outcomes, with adjustment for age, sex, and time where appropriate. Results: In RA, higher treatment adherence was associated with lower disease activity over time. In AS, comparable associations were not detected, possibly reflecting disease-specific factors, limited variability in adherence, and reduced statistical power in the smaller AS subgroup. Better patient–provider communication was associated with higher adherence and lower anxiety, whereas greater social isolation was associated with poorer quality of life. More favorable dietary support was associated with better adherence, although the magnitude of this association should be interpreted cautiously because of sparse categories and wide confidence intervals. Lower inflammatory burden, particularly lower CRP over time, was associated with lower hospitalization-related costs. Conclusions: In this selected cohort of repeatedly hospitalized patients with RA or AS, treatment adherence, psychosocial factors, and supportive care indicators were associated with clinically relevant longitudinal outcomes. The findings support a multidisciplinary, patient-centered approach to inflammatory rheumatic disease care. However, because of the retrospective design, modest sample size, selected inpatient population, non-standardized assessment of several variables, and possible instability of some ordinal model estimates, the results should be interpreted as exploratory and confirmed in larger prospective cohorts.