John L Villano Villano

Dr. John L Villano Villano

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 September 2014 in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JTJigisha P. Thakkar
Jigisha P. Thakkar
TDTherese A. Dolecek
Therese A. Dolecek
CHCraig Horbinski
Craig Horbinski
QOQuinn T. Ostrom
Quinn T. Ostrom
DLDonita D. Lightner
Donita D. Lightner
JVJohn L Villano Villano
John L Villano Villano
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary central nervous system malignancy with a median survival of 15 months. The average incidence rate of GBM is 3.19/100,000 population, and the median age of diagnosis is 64 years. Incidence is higher in men and individuals of white race and non-Hispanic ethnicity. Many genetic and environmental factors have been studied in GBM, but the majority are sporadic, and no risk factor accounting for a large proportion of GBMs has been identified. However, several favorable clinical prognostic factors are identified, including younger age at diagnosis, cerebellar location, high performance status, and maximal tumor resection. GBMs comprise of primary and secondary subtypes, which evolve through different genetic pathways, affect patients at different ages, and have differences in outcomes. We report the current epidemiology of GBM with new data from the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States 2006 to 2010 as well as demonstrate and discuss trends in incidence and survival. We also provide a concise review on molecular markers in GBM that have helped distinguish biologically similar subtypes of GBM and have prognostic and predictive value. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(10); 1985–96. ©2014 AACR.

20 February 2023 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CTChristina I. Tsien
Christina I. Tsien
SPStephanie L. Pugh
Stephanie L. Pugh
ADAdam Paul Dicker
Adam Paul Dicker
JRJeffrey J. Raizer
Jeffrey J. Raizer
MMMartha M. Matuszak
Martha M. Matuszak
MMMinesh p Mehta
Minesh p Mehta
PURPOSE: To assess whether reirradiation (re-RT) and concurrent bevacizumab (BEV) improve overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS), compared with BEV alone in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). The primary objective was OS, and secondary objectives included PFS, response rate, and treatment adverse events (AEs) including delayed CNS toxicities.METHODS: NRG Oncology/RTOG1205 is a prospective, phase II, randomized trial of re-RT and BEV versus BEV alone. Stratification factors included age, resection, and Karnofsky performance status (KPS). Patients with recurrent GBM with imaging evidence of tumor progression ≥ 6 months from completion of prior chemo-RT were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to re-RT, 35 Gy in 10 fractions, with concurrent BEV IV 10 mg/kg once in every 2 weeks or BEV alone until progression.RESULTS: From December 2012 to April 2016, 182 patients were randomly assigned, of whom 170 were eligible. Patient characteristics were well balanced between arms. The median follow-up for censored patients was 12.8 months. There was no improvement in OS for BEV + RT, hazard ratio, 0.98; 80% CI, 0.79 to 1.23; P = .46; the median survival time was 10.1 versus 9.7 months for BEV + RT versus BEV alone. The median PFS for BEV + RT was 7.1 versus 3.8 months for BEV, hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53 to 1.0; P = .05. The 6-month PFS rate improved from 29.1% (95% CI, 19.1 to 39.1) for BEV to 54.3% (95% CI, 43.5 to 65.1) for BEV + RT, P = .001. Treatment was well tolerated. There were a 5% rate of acute grade 3+ treatment-related AEs and no delayed high-grade AEs. Most patients died of recurrent GBM.CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, NRG Oncology/RTOG1205 is the first prospective, randomized multi-institutional study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of re-RT in recurrent GBM using modern RT techniques. Overall, re-RT was shown to be safe and well tolerated. BEV + RT demonstrated a clinically meaningful improvement in PFS, specifically the 6-month PFS rate but no difference in OS.

6 August 2012 in Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BMBridget J. McCarthy
Bridget J. McCarthy
SSSoichiro Shibui
Soichiro Shibui
TKTakamasa Kayama
Takamasa Kayama
EMEtsuo Miyaoka
Etsuo Miyaoka
YNYoshitaka Narita
Yoshitaka Narita
JVJohn L Villano Villano
John L Villano Villano
Intracranial germ cell tumors (GCTs) are relatively rare. Their incidence has been considered to be higher in East Asia than in the United States. This study estimates the incidence of CNS GCTs in Japan and the United States, investigates gender discrepancies in each country, and describes treatment outcomes. Data on primary CNS GCTs from 4 databases were utilized: population-based malignant incidence data from (1) the Japan Cancer Surveillance Research Group (2004–2006; 14 registries), malignant and nonmalignant incidence data from (2) the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (2004–2008; 17 registries), and hospital-based observed survival data from (3) the Brain Tumor Registry of Japan (1984–2000) and (4) the US National Cancer Data Base (1990–2003). Incidence rates per 100 000 for malignant GCTs were not statistically significantly different between Japan (males = 0.143, females = 0.046) and the United States (males = 0.118, females = 0.030). The malignant incidence-rate ratio was higher for pineal GCTs versus nonpineal (ie, the rest of the brain) GCTs in Japan (11.5:1 vs 1.9:1, respectively) and the United States (16.0:1 vs 1.7:1, respectively). In general, 5-year survival estimates were high: over 75% for all GCTs, and over 81% for germinomas, regardless of the type of treatment in either Japan or the United States. The incidence of primary GCTs is similar between Japan and the United States and has the same gender-based patterns by location. High rates of survival were observed in both countries.

2 June 2014 in Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JVJohn L Villano Villano
John L Villano Villano
EDEric B. Durbin
Eric B. Durbin
CNChris Normandeau
Chris Normandeau
JTJigisha P. Thakkar
Jigisha P. Thakkar
VMValentina Moirangthem
Valentina Moirangthem
FDFaith G. Davis
Faith G. Davis
No reliable estimates are available on the incidence of brain metastasis (BM) in cancer patients. This information is valuable for planning patient care and developing measures that may prevent or decrease the likelihood of metastatic brain disease. We report the first population-based analysis on BM incidence at cancer diagnosis using the Kentucky Cancer Registry (KCR) and Alberta Cancer Registry (ACR). All cancer cases with BM were identified from KCR and ACR, with subsequent focus on metastases from lung primaries; the annual number of BMs at initial presentation was derived. Comparisons were made between Kentucky and Alberta for the stage and site of organ involvement of lung cancer. Low incidence of BM was observed in the United States until mandatory reporting began in 2010. Both the KCR and ACR recorded the highest incidence of BM from lung cancer, with total BM cases at initial presentation occurring at 88% and 77%, respectively. For lung cancer, stage IV was the most common stage at presentation for both registries and ranged from 45.9% to 57.2%. When BM from lung was identified, the most common synchronous organ site of metastasis was osseous, occurring at 28.4%. Our analysis from the Kentucky and Alberta cancer registries similarly demonstrated the aggressive nature of lung cancer and its propensity for BM at initial presentation. Besides widespread organ involvement, no synchronous organ site predicted BM in lung cancer. BM is a common and important clinical outcome, and use of registry data is becoming more available.

20 February 2019 in Clinical and Translational Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CGCatherine Garcia
Catherine Garcia
RJRani Jayswal
Rani Jayswal
VAVal Adams
Val Adams
LALowell Anthony
Lowell Anthony
JVJohn L Villano Villano
John L Villano Villano

14 April 2015 in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TDTherese A. Dolecek
Therese A. Dolecek
EDEmily Van Meter Dressler
Emily Van Meter Dressler
JTJigisha P. Thakkar
Jigisha P. Thakkar
MLMeng Liu
Meng Liu
AAAbeer Al‐Qaisi
Abeer Al‐Qaisi
JVJohn L Villano Villano
John L Villano Villano
BACKGROUND: The current analysis follows the implementation of Public Law 107‐260, the Benign Brain Tumor Cancer Registries Amendment Act, which mandated the collection of nonmalignant brain tumors.METHODS: Meningiomas were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program database for the years 2004 to 2011. Demographic and clinical characteristics, initial treatment patterns, and survival outcomes were evaluated using surveillance epidemiology statistical methods.RESULTS: The average annual age‐adjusted incidence rate per 100,000 population was 7.62 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 7.55‐7.68) for all meningiomas, 7.18 (95% CI, 7.12‐7.25) for benign meningiomas, 0.32 (95% CI, 0.31‐0.33) for borderline malignant meningiomas, and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.11‐0.12) for malignant meningiomas. The annual rates increased for benign and borderline malignant tumors but decreased for malignant tumors. The rates for women exceeded those for men, especially for those with benign meningiomas. Black race was associated with significantly higher rates as was advancing age. Greater than 80% of tumors were located in cerebral meninges. Diagnostic confirmation through pathology occurred for approximately 50% of benign tumors, 90% of borderline malignant tumors, and 80% of malignant tumors. No initial treatment was reported for greater than 60% of benign tumors, 29% of borderline malignant tumors, or 31% of malignant tumors. The 5‐year relative survival estimates for benign tumors, borderline malignant tumors, and malignant tumors were 85.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85%‐86.2%), 82.3% (95% CI, 79.3%‐84.8%), and 66% (95% CI, 60.6%‐70.9%), respectively. Predictors of poorer survival were advanced age, being male gender, black race, no initial treatment, and malignant tumor behavior.CONCLUSIONS: The current analysis demonstrates that there is an increasing incidence of nonmalignant meningiomas, probably because of reporting learning curves associated with the implementation of Public Law 107‐260. The high proportion of cases who receive no initial treatment is a survival outcome concern, especially for patients with malignant meningiomas. Cancer 2015;121:2400–2410. © 2015 American Cancer Society.