Recent policy initiatives, such as the Ministry of Education of China’s guidelines on student sleep management, together with international empirical studies on daytime rest, highlight that appropriate opportunities for midday rest can support students’ attention, memory, and overall learning. Motivated by these developments, this study introduces a conflict-sensitive, multidimensional framework for evaluating nap-compatible classroom chairs. The proposed PLEASURC framework integrates eight evaluation dimensions, organized into four domains—ergonomic, operational, perceptual, and affective—thereby combining both expert and student perspectives across three use scenarios (writing, adjusting, and napping). Perceptual divergence between groups is addressed through Jensen–Shannon divergence–based adaptive weighting, which adjusts expert–student influence according to their agreement level. Scenario-sensitive patterns are extracted via tensor decomposition (a statistical factor analysis technique), while SHAP-enhanced machine learning (an explainable model interpretation method) is employed to identify the most influential predictors of perceived comfort. Findings indicate that relational and emotional dimensions (e.g., Relatability, Learnability, Aesthetics) significantly influence perceived comfort, surpassing structural considerations alone. The study also demonstrates a closed feedback loop from evaluation to redesign, supporting the practical utility of the framework through the optimized chair prototype. Overall, this research offers a replicable and interpretable framework for ergonomic evaluation and data-driven redesign of multifunctional school furniture, contributing to both student-centered learning environments and sustainable educational infrastructure.

Wardrobe fronts form a major visual element in bedroom interiors, yet material selection for their colors and textures often relies on intuition rather than evidence. This study develops a data-driven framework that links gaze behavior and affective responses to occupants’ preferences for wardrobe front materials. Forty adults evaluated color and texture swatches and rendered bedroom scenes while eye-tracking data capturing attraction, retention, and exploration were collected. Pairwise choices were modeled using a Bradley–Terry approach, and visual-attention features were integrated with emotion ratings to construct an interpretable attention index for predicting preferences. Results show that neutral light colors and structured wood-like textures consistently rank highest, with scene context reducing preference differences but not altering the order. Shorter time to first fixation and longer fixation duration were the strongest predictors of desirability, demonstrating the combined influence of rapid visual capture and sustained attention. Within the tested stimulus set and viewing conditions, the proposed pipeline yields consistent preference rankings and an interpretable attention-based score that supports evidence-informed shortlisting of wardrobe-front materials. The reported relationships between gaze, affect, and choice are associative and are intended to guide design decisions within the scope of the present experimental settings.

This research investigates how the inclusion of bone glue affects the performance of traditional painted furniture ground layers, particularly under dry–wet cycling conditions. The ground layers, applied to wood substrates in seven different ratios of bone glue to gypsum powder (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, and 60%), were tested for mass changes, dimensional stability, adhesion, and surface roughness. The results showed that higher bone glue content (especially 50% and 60%) led to improved stability, reduced mass fluctuations, and better dimensional stability. The 50% bone glue sample exhibited the best overall stability with minimal weight change (<1.6%) and reduced shrinkage. Adhesion strength increased with bone glue content, reaching 3.48 MPa at 60% bone glue. Lower bone glue content resulted in poor adhesion and visible defects such as cracking and blistering. SEM analysis confirmed that higher bone glue content enhanced bonding between the ground layer and the wood substrate.

Contact-surface construction affects pressure distribution, physiological response, and perceived comfort in body-contact furniture. This study compared five contact interfaces for classroom nap chairs: rigid polypropylene (PP), a thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)-surfaced PP laminate, woven mesh, closed-cell ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) foam, and flexible polyurethane (PU) foam. Twenty-six participants, including 13 females and 13 males, were tested in a 95° study posture and a 135° nap posture at the head–neck, waist–back, and hip–thigh regions. Four participant-level pressure indicators were direction-corrected and combined using an equal-weight geometric mean. The pressure index was integrated with electrodermal activity (EDA) at the participant level and subsequently combined across postures with weak subjective calibration. Under the 95° posture, EVA foam ranked highest at the hip–thigh region, while PU foam ranked highest at the waist–back and head–neck regions. Under the 135° posture, woven mesh ranked highest at the hip–thigh and head–neck regions, while PU foam remained highest at the waist–back region. Final integrated suitability differed significantly among materials in all three body regions (Friedman χ² (4) = 90.246–96.769, all p < 0.001). M4 had the highest mean in the head–neck region (0.648), but did not differ significantly from M5 (0.634; Holm-adjusted p = 0.075). M5 had the highest mean in the waist–back region (0.821), and M3 in the hip–thigh region (0.679); both were significantly higher than the corresponding second-ranked interfaces (Holm-adjusted p < 0.001). Exploratory stiffness models indicated peak locations near 130 kPa for the head–neck region and 140 kPa for the hip–thigh region, whereas the waist–back response was highest at the lower measured boundary of 70 kPa. These findings support region-specific interface design rather than a uniform contact surface for the entire chair.