Julia Ney

Mrs. Julia Ney


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JNJulia Ney
Julia Ney
KHKatleen Hoffmann
Katleen Hoffmann
PMPatrick Meybohm
Patrick Meybohm
AGAndreas Goetzenich
Andreas Goetzenich
SKSandra Kraemer
Sandra Kraemer
CSChristian Stoppe
Christian Stoppe
In contrast to several smaller studies, which demonstrate that remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) reduces myocardial injury in patients that undergo cardiovascular surgery, the RIPHeart study failed to demonstrate beneficial effects of troponin release and clinical outcome in propofol-anesthetized cardiac surgery patients. Therefore, we addressed the potential biochemical mechanisms triggered by RIPC. This is a predefined prospective sub-analysis of the randomized and controlled RIPHeart study in cardiac surgery patients (n = 40) that was recently published. Blood samples were drawn from patients prior to surgery, after RIPC of four cycles of 5 min arm ischemia/5 min reperfusion (n = 19) and the sham (n = 21) procedure, after connection to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), at the end of surgery, 24 h postoperatively, and 48 h postoperatively for the measurement of troponin T, macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), stromal cell-derived factor 1 (CXCL12), IL-6, CXCL8, and IL-10. After RIPC, right atrial tissue samples were taken for the measurement of extracellular-signal regulated kinase (ERK1/2), protein kinase B (AKT), Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3β), protein kinase C (PKCε), and MIF content. RIPC did not significantly reduce the troponin release when compared with the sham procedure. MIF serum levels intraoperatively increased, peaking at intensive care unit (ICU) admission (with an increase of 48.04%, p = 0.164 in RIPC; and 69.64%, p = 0.023 over the baseline in the sham procedure), and decreased back to the baseline 24 h after surgery, with no differences between the groups. In the right atrial tissue, MIF content decreased after RIPC (1.040 ± 1.032 Arbitrary units [au] in RIPC vs. 2.028 ± 1.631 [au] in the sham procedure, p < 0.05). CXCL12 serum levels increased significantly over the baseline at the end of surgery, with no differences between the groups. ERK1/2, AKT, GSK-3β, and PKCɛ phosphorylation in the right atrial samples were no different between the groups. No difference was found in IL-6, CXCL8, and IL10 serum levels between the groups. In this cohort of cardiac surgery patients that received propofol anesthesia, we could not show a release of potential mediators of signaling, nor an effect on the inflammatory response, nor an activation of well-established protein kinases after RIPC. Based on these data, we cannot exclude that confounding factors, such as propofol, may have interfered with RIPC.

1 December 2019 in Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JNJulia Ney
Julia Ney
DHDaren K. Heyland
Daren K. Heyland
KAKarin Amrein
Karin Amrein
GMGernot Marx
Gernot Marx
OGOliver Grottke
Oliver Grottke
CSChristian Stoppe
Christian Stoppe
Recent studies indicate that vitamin D deficiency is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Knowledge about the functional role and clinical relevance of vitamin D for patients undergoing cardiac surgery is sparse. Therefore, we investigated the clinical significance of vitamin D levels on outcome of cardiac surgery patients. 92 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary arrest were included in this prospective observational pilot study. 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) levels were measured prior to surgery, immediately postoperatively as well as 6, 12 and 24 h after surgery. We assessed postoperative organ dysfunctions, infections and death until hospital discharge. The serum concentration of 1,25(OH)2D significantly decreased intraoperatively by 29.3% (p < 0.001) and was significantly lower at any postoperative time point compared to baseline values, whereas 25OHD levels did not show significant changes during the observation period. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients had significant higher baseline 1,25(OH)2D values than patients with valve surgery (39.7 ± 13.9 ng/l vs. 30.1 ± 14.1 ng/l, p = 0.010) or CABG + valve surgery (39.7 ± 13.9 ng/l vs. 32.6 ± 11.8 ng/l, p = 0.044). Our data showed a significant odds ratio to develop postoperative organ dysfunction (OR 0.95; p = 0.009) and PCT levels ≥5 μg/l (OR 0.94; p = 0.046) for every ng/l increment in 1,25(OH)2D, when performing multivariable analysis and after adjusting for preoperative illness and demographics. In addition, multivariable-adjusted statistical analyses revealed that patients stayed significantly shorter on ICU (-0.21 h; p = 0.001) and in hospital (-2.6 days; p = 0.009) for every ng/l increment in 1,25(OH)2D. Our data highlight important evidence about the clinical significance of 1,25(OH)2D levels in cardiac surgery patients. Higher levels were associated with significantly less postoperative organ dysfunctions, elevated PCT levels, death and prolonged hospital stay. 1,25(OH)2D levels decreased significantly intra- and postoperatively, while serum levels of 25OHD did not. clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02488876), registered May 1, 2015.

25 August 2019 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EKEllen C. D. Kühn-Heid
Ellen C. D. Kühn-Heid
EKEike Christian Kühn
Eike Christian Kühn
JNJulia Ney
Julia Ney
SWSebastian Wendt
Sebastian Wendt
JSJulian Seelig
Julian Seelig
Lutz SchomburgLutz Schomburg
Lutz Schomburg
Selenium-binding protein 1 (SELENBP1) is an intracellular protein that has been detected in the circulation in response to myocardial infarction. Hypoxia and cardiac surgery affect selenoprotein expression and selenium (Se) status. For this reason, we decided to analyze circulating SELENBP1 concentrations in patients (n = 75) necessitating cardioplegia and a cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) during the course of the cardiac surgery. Serum samples were collected at seven time-points spanning the full surgical process. SELENBP1 was quantified by a highly sensitive newly developed immunological assay. Serum concentrations of SELENBP1 increased markedly during the intervention and showed a positive association with the duration of ischemia (ρ = 0.6, p < 0.0001). Elevated serum SELENBP1 concentrations at 1 h after arrival at the intensive care unit (post-surgery) were predictive to identify patients at risk of adverse outcome (death, bradycardia or cerebral ischemia, “endpoint 1”; OR 29.9, CI 3.3–268.8, p = 0.00027). Circulating SELENBP1 during intervention (2 min after reperfusion or 15 min after weaning from the CPB) correlated positively with an established marker of myocardial infarction (CK-MB) measured after the intervention (each with ρ = 0.5, p < 0.0001). We concluded that serum concentrations of SELENBP1 were strongly associated with cardiac arrest and the duration of myocardial ischemia already early during surgery, thereby constituting a novel and promising quantitative marker for myocardial hypoxia, with a high potential to improve diagnostics and prediction in combination with the established clinical parameters.

1 July 2025 in Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LKLena Katharina Knüvener
Lena Katharina Knüvener
SKSebastian Kalverkamp
Sebastian Kalverkamp
JSJan Spillner
Jan Spillner
JNJulia Ney
Julia Ney
WKWiam Khader
Wiam Khader
LGLinda Grüßer
Linda Grüßer
Purpose: Medical societies around the globe are searching for ways to decrease the environmental impacts of patient care. This pilot project aims to identify potentials for more sustainability in clinical routine by investigating the resource consumption of thoracic surgery patients. Methods: This single-centre, observational, prospective pilot project was conducted at the RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Germany, from May 2023 to August 2023. Five patients with planned video-assisted-thoracoscopic surgery for removal of (suspected) lung cancer were included and followed throughout their treatment at the hospital. We recorded resource consumption for their direct care and investigated the share of disposable and reusable products and the packaging of disposable products. Additionally, we conducted a PubMed literature search on available life cycle assessments of the utilised products and investigated manufacturers’ online information on sustainability aspects of their products. Results: An average of 1254 disposable (75%) and reusable (25%) products were used per patient throughout their hospital journey. Most disposable products’ packaging contained plastic. We identified 30 publications that reported life cycle assessments. Manufacturers provided information on sustainability aspects for 10% of the products utilised. Conclusions: In-hospital patient care is resource intensive. Disposable products outnumbered reusable products at every stage of the patient’s journey and were mostly packaged in materials containing plastic. For the majority of products, no information concerning their environmental impact was accessible hampering informed purchasing choices by clinicians. Further efforts are essential to make environmental data available, leverage circular-economy systems, and ultimately decrease the environmental impacts of the healthcare sector.