Wataru Yamagami

Prof. Wataru Yamagami

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2017 in Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WYWataru Yamagami
Wataru Yamagami
SNSatoru Nagase
Satoru Nagase
FTFumiaki Takahashi
Fumiaki Takahashi
KIKazuhiko Ino
Kazuhiko Ino
THToru Hachisuga
Toru Hachisuga
HKHidetaka Katabuchi
Hidetaka Katabuchi
Yamagami W, et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Oct;28(2):e32. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e32

1 June 2019 in Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HMHiroko Machida
Hiroko Machida
KMKoji Matsuo
Koji Matsuo
WYWataru Yamagami
Wataru Yamagami
YEYasuhiko Ebina
Yasuhiko Ebina
YKYoichi Kobayashi
Yoichi Kobayashi
MMMikio Mikami
Mikio Mikami

1 January 2020 in Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WYWataru Yamagami
Wataru Yamagami
MMMikio Mikami
Mikio Mikami
SNSatoru Nagase
Satoru Nagase
TTTsutomu Tabata
Tsutomu Tabata
YKYoichi Kobayashi
Yoichi Kobayashi
DADaisuke Aoki
Daisuke Aoki
The Fourth Edition of the Guidelines for Treatment of Uterine Body Neoplasm was published in 2018. These guidelines include 9 chapters: 1. Overview of the guidelines, 2. Initial treatment for endometrial cancer, 3. Postoperative adjuvant therapy for endometrial cancer, 4. Post-treatment surveillance for endometrial cancer, 5. Treatment for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, 6. Fertility-sparing therapy, 7. Treatment of uterine carcinosarcoma and uterine sarcoma, 8. Treatment of trophoblastic disease, 9. Document collection; and nine algorithms: 1-3. Initial treatment of endometrial cancer, 4. Postoperative adjuvant treatment for endometrial cancer, 5. Treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer, 6. Fertility-sparing therapy, 7. Treatment for uterine carcinosarcoma, 8. Treatment for uterine sarcoma, 9. Treatment for choriocarcinoma. Each chapter includes overviews and clinical questions, and recommendations, objectives, explanation, and references are provided for each clinical question. This revision has no major changes compared to the 3rd edition, but does have some differences: 1) an explanation of the recommendation decision process and conflict of interest considerations have been added in the overview, 2) nurses, pharmacists and patients participated in creation of the guidelines, in addition to physicians, 3) the approach to evidence collection is listed at the end of the guidelines, and 4) for clinical questions that lack evidence or clinical validation, the opinion of the Guidelines Committee is given as a "Recommendations for tomorrow".

1 January 2018 in Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WYWataru Yamagami
Wataru Yamagami
NSNobuyuki Susumu
Nobuyuki Susumu
TMTakeshi Makabe
Takeshi Makabe
KSKensuke Sakai
Kensuke Sakai
HNHiroyuki Nomura
Hiroyuki Nomura
DADaisuke Aoki
Daisuke Aoki
Yamagami W, et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Dec;29:e21. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e21

15 January 2016 in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OIOsamu Inoue
Osamu Inoue
THToshio Hamatani
Toshio Hamatani
NSNobuyuki Susumu
Nobuyuki Susumu
WYWataru Yamagami
Wataru Yamagami
SOSeiji Ogawa
Seiji Ogawa
DADaisuke Aoki
Daisuke Aoki
Patients hoping to preserve their fertility receive conservative treatment with high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) for well-differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EC) or atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) . Such treatment generally involves frequent intrauterine operations, including dilation and curettage (D&C) and endometrial biopsy (EMB), which could result in endometritis, endometrial thinning, or intrauterine adhesion. In turn, any of these outcomes could adversely affect implantation and pregnancy development. The current study thus aimed to identify factors that might affect pregnancy following conservative treatment by MPA. We compared a pregnancy group (45 patients) with a non-pregnancy group (53 patients) of MPA-treated patients to evaluate the factors affecting clinical pregnancy establishment. We undertook a multivariate logistic regression analysis based on factors shown by univariate analysis to be significantly different between the groups. Univariate analysis identified number of D&C, endometrial thickness, duration of MPA administration, age of pregnancy permission (the age at which a patient was first allowed to attempt pregnancy after disappearance of the lesion), period of disappearance of lesions, and recurrence as independent variables. The odds ratios (95 % confidence interval) of multivariate analysis for disease recurrence, endometrial thickness during ovulation, and age of pregnancy permission were 0.283 (0.102–0.785), 1.677 (1.251–2.248), and 0.889 (0.792–0.998), respectively. There was no significant difference in the other independent variables between groups. We identified three factors considered to affect pregnancy establishment following conservative treatment with MPA: recurrence, endometrial thickness during ovulation, and the age of the pregnancy permission. Introduction of infertility treatment including assisted reproductive technology (ART) soon after achieving tumor disappearance by MPA would therefore be beneficial for patients with disease recurrence, thin endometrium, or a higher age of pregnancy permission.

1 January 2024 in Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSManabu Seino
Manabu Seino
SNSatoru Nagase
Satoru Nagase
HTHideki Tokunaga
Hideki Tokunaga
WYWataru Yamagami
Wataru Yamagami
YKYoichi Kobayashi
Yoichi Kobayashi
MMMikio Mikami
Mikio Mikami
Seino M, et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Nov;35(1):e15. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e15