Roderic Guigó Serra

Dr. Roderic Guigó Serra

Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG) C/ Dr. Aiguader, 88 PRBB Building 08003 Barcelona, Spain

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 September 2012 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDSarah Djebali
Sarah Djebali
CDCarrie A. Davis
Carrie A. Davis
AMAngelika Merkel
Angelika Merkel
ADAlex Dobin
Alex Dobin
TLTimo Lassmann
Timo Lassmann
TGThomas R. Gingeras
Thomas R. Gingeras
Eukaryotic cells make many types of primary and processed RNAs that are found either in specific subcellular compartments or throughout the cells. A complete catalogue of these RNAs is not yet available and their characteristic subcellular localizations are also poorly understood. Because RNA represents the direct output of the genetic information encoded by genomes and a significant proportion of a cell’s regulatory capabilities are focused on its synthesis, processing, transport, modification and translation, the generation of such a catalogue is crucial for understanding genome function. Here we report evidence that three-quarters of the human genome is capable of being transcribed, as well as observations about the range and levels of expression, localization, processing fates, regulatory regions and modifications of almost all currently annotated and thousands of previously unannotated RNAs. These observations, taken together, prompt a redefinition of the concept of a gene.

5 September 2012 in Genome Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TDThomas Derrien
Thomas Derrien
Rory JohnsonRory Johnson
Rory Johnson
GBGiovanni Bussotti
Giovanni Bussotti
ATAndrea Tanzer
Andrea Tanzer
SDSarah Djebali
Sarah Djebali
Roderic Guigó SerraRoderic Guigó Serra
Roderic Guigó Serra
The human genome contains many thousands of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). While several studies have demonstrated compelling biological and disease roles for individual examples, analytical and experimental approaches to investigate these genes have been hampered by the lack of comprehensive lncRNA annotation. Here, we present and analyze the most complete human lncRNA annotation to date, produced by the GENCODE consortium within the framework of the ENCODE project and comprising 9277 manually annotated genes producing 14,880 transcripts. Our analyses indicate that lncRNAs are generated through pathways similar to that of protein-coding genes, with similar histone-modification profiles, splicing signals, and exon/intron lengths. In contrast to protein-coding genes, however, lncRNAs display a striking bias toward two-exon transcripts, they are predominantly localized in the chromatin and nucleus, and a fraction appear to be preferentially processed into small RNAs. They are under stronger selective pressure than neutrally evolving sequences—particularly in their promoter regions, which display levels of selection comparable to protein-coding genes. Importantly, about one-third seem to have arisen within the primate lineage. Comprehensive analysis of their expression in multiple human organs and brain regions shows that lncRNAs are generally lower expressed than protein-coding genes, and display more tissue-specific expression patterns, with a large fraction of tissue-specific lncRNAs expressed in the brain. Expression correlation analysis indicates that lncRNAs show particularly striking positive correlation with the expression of antisense coding genes. This GENCODE annotation represents a valuable resource for future studies of lncRNAs.

19 November 2014 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FYFeng Yue
Feng Yue
YCYong Cheng
Yong Cheng
ABAlessandra Breschi
Alessandra Breschi
JVJeff Vierstra
Jeff Vierstra
WWWeisheng Wu
Weisheng Wu
TCThe Mouse ENCODE Consortium
The Mouse ENCODE Consortium
The laboratory mouse shares the majority of its protein-coding genes with humans, making it the premier model organism in biomedical research, yet the two mammals differ in significant ways. To gain greater insights into both shared and species-specific transcriptional and cellular regulatory programs in the mouse, the Mouse ENCODE Consortium has mapped transcription, DNase I hypersensitivity, transcription factor binding, chromatin modifications and replication domains throughout the mouse genome in diverse cell and tissue types. By comparing with the human genome, we not only confirm substantial conservation in the newly annotated potential functional sequences, but also find a large degree of divergence of sequences involved in transcriptional regulation, chromatin state and higher order chromatin organization. Our results illuminate the wide range of evolutionary forces acting on genes and their regulatory regions, and provide a general resource for research into mammalian biology and mechanisms of human diseases.

8 May 2015 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMarta Melé
Marta Melé
Pedro G. FerreiraPedro G. Ferreira
Pedro G. Ferreira
FRFerran Reverter
Ferran Reverter
DDDavid S. DeLuca
David S. DeLuca
JMJean Monlong
Jean Monlong
Roderic Guigó SerraRoderic Guigó Serra
Roderic Guigó Serra
Expression, genetic variation, and tissues: Human genomes show extensive genetic variation across individuals, but we have only just started documenting the effects of this variation on the regulation of gene expression. Furthermore, only a few tissues have been examined per genetic variant. In order to examine how genetic expression varies among tissues within individuals, the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Consortium collected 1641 postmortem samples covering 54 body sites from 175 individuals. They identified quantitative genetic traits that affect gene expression and determined which of these exhibit tissue-specific expression patterns. Meléet al.measured how transcription varies among tissues, and Rivaset al.looked at how truncated protein variants affect expression across tissues.Science, this issue p.648, p.660, p.666; see also p.640

13 August 2012 in Genome Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMouse ENCODE Consortium
Mouse ENCODE Consortium
JSJohn A Stamatoyannopoulos
John A Stamatoyannopoulos
MSMichael P Snyder
Michael P Snyder
RHRoss C Hardison
Ross C Hardison
BRBing Ren
Bing Ren
LALeslie B Adams
Leslie B Adams
To complement the human Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project and to enable a broad range of mouse genomics efforts, the Mouse ENCODE Consortium is applying the same experimental pipelines developed for human ENCODE to annotate the mouse genome.

5 September 2012 in Genome Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HTHagen Tilgner
Hagen Tilgner
DKDavid G. Knowles
David G. Knowles
Rory JohnsonRory Johnson
Rory Johnson
CDCarrie A. Davis
Carrie A. Davis
SCSudipto Chakrabortty
Sudipto Chakrabortty
Roderic Guigó SerraRoderic Guigó Serra
Roderic Guigó Serra
Splicing remains an incompletely understood process. Recent findings suggest that chromatin structure participates in its regulation. Here, we analyze the RNA from subcellular fractions obtained through RNA-seq in the cell line K562. We show that in the human genome, splicing occurs predominantly during transcription. We introduce the coSI measure, based on RNA-seq reads mapping to exon junctions and borders, to assess the degree of splicing completion around internal exons. We show that, as expected, splicing is almost fully completed in cytosolic polyA+ RNA. In chromatin-associated RNA (which includes the RNA that is being transcribed), for 5.6% of exons, the removal of the surrounding introns is fully completed, compared with 0.3% of exons for which no intron-removal has occurred. The remaining exons exist as a mixture of spliced and fewer unspliced molecules, with a median coSI of 0.75. Thus, most RNAs undergo splicing while being transcribed: “co-transcriptional splicing.” Consistent with co-transcriptional spliceosome assembly and splicing, we have found significant enrichment of spliceosomal snRNAs in chromatin-associated RNA compared with other cellular RNA fractions and other nonspliceosomal snRNAs. CoSI scores decrease along the gene, pointing to a “first transcribed, first spliced” rule, yet more downstream exons carry other characteristics, favoring rapid, co-transcriptional intron removal. Exons with low coSI values, that is, in the process of being spliced, are enriched with chromatin marks, consistent with a role for chromatin in splicing during transcription. For alternative exons and long noncoding RNAs, splicing tends to occur later, and the latter might remain unspliced in some cases.