Jingyu Liu

Dr. Jingyu Liu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2009 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VCVince Calhoun
Vince Calhoun
JLJingyu Liu
Jingyu Liu
TATülay Adalı
Tülay Adalı

8 June 2015 in Schizophrenia Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EWEsther Walton
Esther Walton
JHJohanna Hass
Johanna Hass
JLJingyu Liu
Jingyu Liu
JRJoshua L. Roffman
Joshua L. Roffman
FBFabio Bernardoni
Fabio Bernardoni
SEStefan Ehrlich
Stefan Ehrlich
Given the difficulty of procuring human brain tissue, a key question in molecular psychiatry concerns the extent to which epigenetic signatures measured in more accessible tissues such as blood can serve as a surrogate marker for the brain. Here, we aimed (1) to investigate the blood-brain correspondence of DNA methylation using a within-subject design and (2) to identify changes in DNA methylation of brain-related biological pathways in schizophrenia. We obtained paired blood and temporal lobe biopsy samples simultaneously from 12 epilepsy patients during neurosurgical treatment. Using the Infinium 450K methylation array we calculated similarity of blood and brain DNA methylation for each individual separately. We applied our findings by performing gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) of peripheral blood DNA methylation data (Infinium 27K) of 111 schizophrenia patients and 122 healthy controls and included only Cytosine-phosphate-Guanine (CpG) sites that were significantly correlated across tissues. Only 7.9% of CpG sites showed a statistically significant, large correlation between blood and brain tissue, a proportion that although small was significantly greater than predicted by chance. GSEA analysis of schizophrenia data revealed altered methylation profiles in pathways related to precursor metabolites and signaling peptides. Our findings indicate that most DNA methylation markers in peripheral blood do not reliably predict brain DNA methylation status. However, a subset of peripheral data may proxy methylation status of brain tissue. Restricting the analysis to these markers can identify meaningful epigenetic differences in schizophrenia and potentially other brain disorders.

10 December 2007 in Human Brain Mapping
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJingyu Liu
Jingyu Liu
GPGodfrey Pearlson
Godfrey Pearlson
AWAndreas Windemuth
Andreas Windemuth
GRGualberto Ruano
Gualberto Ruano
NPNora I. Perrone‐Bizzozero
Nora I. Perrone‐Bizzozero
VCVince Calhoun
Vince Calhoun
There is current interest in understanding genetic influences on both healthy and disordered brain function. We assessed brain function with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data collected during an auditory oddball task—detecting an infrequent sound within a series of frequent sounds. Then, task‐related imaging findings were utilized as potential intermediate phenotypes (endophenotypes) to investigate genomic factors derived from a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array. Our target is the linkage of these genomic factors to normal/abnormal brain functionality. We explored parallel independent component analysis (paraICA) as a new method for analyzing multimodal data. The method was aimed to identify simultaneously independent components of each modality and the relationships between them. When 43 healthy controls and 20 schizophrenia patients, all Caucasian, were studied, we found a correlation of 0.38 between one fMRI component and one SNP component. This fMRI component consisted mainly of parietal lobe activations. The relevant SNP component was contributed to significantly by 10 SNPs located in genes, including those coding for the nicotinic α‐7cholinergic receptor, aromatic amino acid decarboxylase, disrupted in schizophrenia 1, among others. Both fMRI and SNP components showed significant differences in loading parameters between the schizophrenia and control groups (P = 0.0006 for the fMRI component; P = 0.001 for the SNP component). In summary, we constructed a framework to identify interactions between brain functional and genetic information; our findings provide a proof‐of‐concept that genomic SNP factors can be investigated by using endophenotypic imaging findings in a multivariate format. Hum Brain Mapp, 2009.

1 August 2011 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJing Sui
Jing Sui
GPGodfrey Pearlson
Godfrey Pearlson
ACArvind Caprihan
Arvind Caprihan
TATülay Adali
Tülay Adali
KKKent A. Kiehl
Kent A. Kiehl
VCVince Calhoun
Vince Calhoun

6 April 2010 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJingyu Liu
Jingyu Liu
MMMarilee Morgan
Marilee Morgan
KHKent Hutchison
Kent Hutchison
VCVince D. Calhoun
Vince D. Calhoun
Sex differences in methylation status have been observed in specific gene-disease studies and healthy methylation variation studies, but little work has been done to study the impact of sex on methylation at the genome wide locus-to-locus level or to determine methods for accounting for sex in genomic association studies. In this study we investigate the genomic sex effect on saliva DNA methylation of 197 subjects (54 females) using 20,493 CpG sites. Three methods, two-sample T-test, principle component analysis and independent component analysis, all successfully identify sex influences. The results show that sex not only influences the methylation of genes in the X chromosome but also in autosomes. 580 autosomal sites show strong differences between males and females. They are found to be highly involved in eight functional groups, including DNA transcription, RNA splicing, membrane, etc. Equally important is that we identify some methylation sites associated with not only sex, but also other phenotypes (age, smoking and drinking level, and cancer). Verification was done through an independent blood cell DNA methylation data (1298 CpG sites from a cancer panel array). The same genomic site-specific influence pattern and potential confounding effects with cancer were observed. The overlapping rate of identified sex affected genes between saliva and blood cell is 81% for X chromosome, and 8% for autosomes. Therefore, correction for sex is necessary. We propose a simple correction method based on independent component analysis, which is a data driven method and accommodates sample differences. Comparison before and after the correction suggests that the method is able to effectively remove the potentially confounding effects of sex, and leave other phenotypes untouched. As such, our method is able to disentangle the sex influence on a genome wide level, and paves the way to achieve more accurate association analyses in genome wide methylation studies.

15 August 2017 in Neuroinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CAC. J. Aine
C. J. Aine
HBH. J. Bockholt
H. J. Bockholt
JBJ. R. Bustillo
J. R. Bustillo
JCJ. M. Cañive
J. M. Cañive
ACA. Caprihan
A. Caprihan
VCVince Calhoun
Vince Calhoun
In this paper we describe an open-access collection of multimodal neuroimaging data in schizophrenia for release to the community. Data were acquired from approximately 100 patients with schizophrenia and 100 age-matched controls during rest as well as several task activation paradigms targeting a hierarchy of cognitive constructs. Neuroimaging data include structural MRI, functional MRI, diffusion MRI, MR spectroscopic imaging, and magnetoencephalography. For three of the hypothesis-driven projects, task activation paradigms were acquired on subsets of ~200 volunteers which examined a range of sensory and cognitive processes (e.g., auditory sensory gating, auditory/visual multisensory integration, visual transverse patterning). Neuropsychological data were also acquired and genetic material via saliva samples were collected from most of the participants and have been typed for both genome-wide polymorphism data as well as genome-wide methylation data. Some results are also presented from the individual studies as well as from our data-driven multimodal analyses (e.g., multimodal examinations of network structure and network dynamics and multitask fMRI data analysis across projects). All data will be released through the Mind Research Network’s collaborative informatics and neuroimaging suite (COINS).