Apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1) variants are risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD) among Black Americans. Data are sparse on the genetic epidemiology of CKD and the clinical association of APOL1 variants with CKD in West Africans, a major group in the Black population. We conducted a case-control study involving participants from Ghana and Nigeria who had CKD stages 2 through 5, biopsy-proven glomerular disease, or no kidney disease. We analyzed the association of CKD with APOL1 variants among participants with high-risk genotypes (two APOL1 risk alleles) and those with low-risk genotypes (fewer than two APOL1 risk alleles) by fitting logistic-regression models that controlled for covariates, including clinical site, age, and sex. Among 8355 participants (4712 with CKD stages 2 through 5, 866 with glomerular diseases, and 2777 with no kidney disease), the prevalence of monoallelic APOL1 variants was 43.0% and that of biallelic APOL1 variants was 29.7%. Participants with two APOL1 risk alleles had higher odds of having CKD than those with one risk allele or no risk alleles (adjusted odds ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11 to 1.40), as well as higher odds of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.30 to 2.61). Participants with one APOL1 risk allele had higher odds of having CKD than those with no risk alleles (adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.33), as well as higher odds of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.48). The inclusion of covariates did not modify the association of monoallelic and biallelic APOL1 variants with CKD or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. In this study, monoallelic APOL1 variants were associated with 18% higher odds of CKD and 61% higher odds of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; biallelic APOL1 variants were associated with 25% higher odds of CKD and 84% higher odds of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. (Funded by the National Human Genome Research Institute and others.).

In people of African ancestry, apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1) variants have been identified as causing increased risk of progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD). In April of 2024, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) convened a Controversies Conference on APOL1 Kidney Disease in Accra, Ghana. The goals of the conference were to review and discuss current evidence and controversies on APOL1 kidney disease, including naming, epidemiology, pathophysiology, APOL1 testing, treatment, and future research needs. Participants considered various terminologies for diseases related to APOL1 risk variants (such as APOL1-mediated or -induced kidney disease) and had highest support for using APOL1 kidney disease to describe kidney pathologies associated with the APOL1 G1 and G2 risk variants. Clinically, the term APOL1 kidney disease can be used on its own or as an overall category of kidney disease, with further specification added as needed (for example, APOL1 kidney disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis). Given that there currently are no established treatments for APOL1 kidney disease, and APOL1 genotype results are not by themselves actionable, there is insufficient evidence to guide recommendations for APOL1 population screening or routine testing. However, genotyping can be an important clinical consideration for individuals to inform risk stratification, frequency of follow-up, living kidney donation, as well as clinical trial eligibility. Key areas of need and strategies for future research were delineated and are reported here.

Variants in the Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) gene (G1-rs60910145, rs73885319, G2-rs71785313) are common in Africans and in individuals of recent African ancestry and are associated with an increased risk of non-diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD) and in particular of HIV associated nephropathy (HIVAN). In light of the significantly increased risk of HIVAN in carriers of two APOL1 risk alleles, a role in HIV infectivity has been postulated in the mechanism of APOL1 associated kidney disease. Herein, we aim to explore the association between HIV viremia and APOL1 genotype. In addition, we investigated interaction between BK and JC viruria, CKD and HIV viremia. A total of 199 persons living with HIV/AIDS (comprising 82 CKD cases and 117 controls) from among the participants in the ongoing Human Heredity and Health in Africa (H3Africa) Kidney Disease Research Network case control study have been recruited. The two APOL1 renal risk alleles (RRA) genotypes were associated with a higher risk of CKD (OR 12.6, 95% CI 3.89–40.8, p < 0.0001). Even a single APOL1 RRA was associated with CKD risk (OR 4.42, 95% CI 1.49–13.15, p = 0.007). The 2 APOL1 RRA genotypes were associated with an increased probability of having HIV viremia (OR 2.37 95% CI 1.0–5.63, p = 0.05). HIV viremia was associated with increased CKD risk (OR 7.45, 95% CI 1.66–33.35, P = 0.009) and with a significant reduction of JC virus urine shedding (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12–0.98, p = 0.046). In contrast to prior studies, JC viruria was not associated with CKD but was restricted in patients with HIV viremia, regardless of CKD status. These findings suggest a role of APOL1 variants in HIV infectivity and emphasize that JC viruria can serve as biomarker for innate immune system activation.

Background: Nigeria reports the highest age-standardized mortality rate for breast cancer (BC) among African countries and disproportionately high rates of high-grade cancer. Histological grade is a strong predictor of mortality, and evidence suggests that educational attainment influences cancer outcomes. Objective: We characterize the association between educational trends across the life course and BC grade at diagnosis. \ Methods: Data on 224 BC patients enrolled in the Mechanisms for Established and Novel Risk Factors for Breast Cancer in Nigerian Women (MEND) study was analyzed. Participant and parental (mother and father) education was categorized as low (primary school or less) or high (secondary school or greater). Accordingly, the educational trend across the life-course was determined for each participant relative to each parent: stable high, increasing, decreasing, or stable low. BC grade was classified as high (grade 3) or low (grades 1-2). Findings: About 34% of participants, 71% of fathers, and 85% of mothers had low education. Approximately one-third of participants were diagnosed with high-grade BC. Participants with low-grade BC were more likely to have highly educated fathers (p = 0.04). After adjusting for age, comorbidities, marital status and mammogram screening, participants with highly educated fathers were 60% less likely to have high-grade BC (aOR 0.41; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.84) compared to those with less-educated fathers. Stable high life-course education relative to father was also associated with a significantly lower likelihood of having high-grade BC (aOR 0.36; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.87) compared to stable low life-course education. No significant associations were observed for the participant's education, mother's education, or life-course education relative to mother. Conclusions: Early-life socioeconomic status (SES) may influence BC grade. This deserves further study to inform policies that may be useful in reducing high-grade BC in Nigeria.

Introduction: The decision to become a living donor requires consideration of a complex, interactive array of factors that could be targeted for clinical, policy, and educational interventions. Our objective was to assess how financial barriers interact with motivators, other barriers, and facilitators during this process.Methods: Data were obtained from a public survey assessing motivators, barriers, and facilitators of living donation. We used multivariable logistic regression and consensus k‐means clustering to assess interactions between financial concerns and other considerations in the decision‐making process.Results: Among 1592 respondents, the average age was 43; 74% were female and 14% and 6% identified as Hispanic and Black, respectively. Among employed respondents (72%), 40% indicated that they would not be able to donate without lost wage reimbursement. Stronger agreement with worries about expenses and dependent care challenges was associated with not being able to donate without lost wage reimbursement (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.0–1.3; OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1–1.3, respectively). Four respondent clusters were identified. Cluster 1 had strong motivators and facilitators with minimal barriers. Cluster 2 had barriers related to health concerns, nervousness, and dependent care. Clusters 3 and 4 had financial barriers. Cluster 3 also had anxiety related to surgery and dependent care.Conclusions: Financial barriers interact primarily with health and dependent care concerns when considering living organ donation. Targeted interventions to reduce financial barriers and improve provider communication regarding donation‐related risks are needed.