Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, impacting approximately 6.1 million adults in the United States, with projections to increase two-fold by 2030. AF significantly increases the risk of stroke and other adverse cardiovascular events, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS guidelines present a paradigm shift in AF management, moving from a duration-based classification to a more comprehensive, patient-centered approach. This includes a novel AF classification system that emphasizes early detection and intervention, including risk factors and lifestyle modification tailored to each patient’s risk profile. Moreover, the recommendations advocate for a multidisciplinary care model, ensuring coordinated management involving primary care providers and specialists. Primary care providers play a crucial role in initiating risk factor management and lifestyle interventions, even before the development of AF. This review aims to thoroughly examine the guidelines for the diagnosis and management of AF and equip general internists with the necessary insights to navigate the evolving landscape of AF care effectively.

Background: Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) is a novel, wire-free, and hyperemia-free physiological assessment for guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), which may offer advantages over traditional angiography-guided PCI. This systematic review with meta-analysis compares clinical outcomes after one year in patients who underwent QFR-guided versus angiography-guided PCI. Methods: This study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered on 4 November 2024 in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024609799). A systematic search was performed across multiple databases to identify clinical trials comparing QFR-guided and angiography-guided PCI. Random-effects models were used to assess one-year outcomes of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), revascularization, and rehospitalization, with heterogeneity measured using I², H², and Cochran’s Q statistics. Study quality was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool. Results: Compared to traditional angiography-guided PCI, QFR-guided PCI was associated with numerically lower but statistically non-significant risks of MACEs (risk difference: −0.08, 95% CI: −0.20 to 0.04), revascularization (risk difference: −0.02, 95% CI: −0.08 to 0.03), and rehospitalization (risk difference: −0.02, 95% CI: −0.08 to 0.04) over one year. Substantial heterogeneity was observed for MACEs (I² = 84.95%, H² = 6.64) and revascularization (I² = 94.18%, H² = 17.18), whereas rehospitalization exhibited low heterogeneity (I² = 17.17%, H² = 1.21). The risk of bias was assessed by the RoB 2 tool, which revealed low to some concern risk of bias across key domains. Conclusions: Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) has demonstrated comparable one-year clinical outcomes to traditional angiography for PCI guidance, with a trend toward improved results. However, the high heterogeneity among studies and the risk of bias necessitate the need for larger, high-quality trials to validate these findings.

Background We explored the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the prevalence and outcomes of takotsubo syndrome (takotsubo) using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to compare trends before and during the pandemic. Methods This retrospective study examined data from over 137 million admissions during 2017-2018 (pre-pandemic) and 2020-2021 (pandemic). Results Our analysis revealed a marked increase in takotsubo prevalence, from 109.07 to 131.19 per 100,000 admissions over each two-year period. The majority of patients were elderly females, with a notable rise in associated comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes during the pandemic. Mortality among takotsubo patients rose significantly, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.28. Patients with concurrent COVID-19 infection had a mortality rate of 23.02%, significantly higher than 7.61% for those without. The length of hospital stays also increased, particularly among COVID-19 patients. Interestingly, the odds of developing takotsubo were lower in COVID-19 patients than in non-infected individuals, suggesting a broader pandemic-related stress impact. Conclusion Our findings highlight a complex interaction between viral infections, stress, and cardiovascular health, underscoring the need for integrated care strategies during global health crises.