Wessam El-Baz

Dr. Wessam El-Baz

Institute of Energy Economy and Application Technology, Technical University of Munich, Arcisstr. 21, 80333 Munich, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2018 in Solar Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WEWessam El-Baz
Wessam El-Baz
PTPeter Tzscheutschler
Peter Tzscheutschler
UWUlrich Wagner
Ulrich Wagner

1 May 2019 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WEWessam El-Baz
Wessam El-Baz
PTPeter Tzscheutschler
Peter Tzscheutschler
UWUlrich Wagner
Ulrich Wagner


1 May 2018 in Solar Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WEWessam El-Baz
Wessam El-Baz
MSMichael Seufzger
Michael Seufzger
SLSandra Lutzenberger
Sandra Lutzenberger
PTPeter Tzscheutschler
Peter Tzscheutschler
UWUlrich Wagner
Ulrich Wagner

14 November 2018 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WEWessam El-Baz
Wessam El-Baz
LMLukas Mayerhofer
Lukas Mayerhofer
PTPeter Tzscheutschler
Peter Tzscheutschler
UWUlrich Wagner
Ulrich Wagner
Heating systems such as heat pumps and combined heat and power cycle systems (CHP) represent a key component in the future smart grid. Their capability to couple the electricity and heat sector promises a massive contribution to the energy transition. Hence, these systems are continuously studied numerically and experimentally to quantify their potential and develop optimal control methods. Although numerical simulations provide time and cost-effective solutions for system development and optimization, they are exposed to several uncertainties. Hardware in the loop (HiL) approaches enable system validation and evaluation under different real-life dynamic constraints and boundary conditions. In this paper, a HiL system of a heat pump testbed is presented. It is used to present two case studies. In the first case, the conventional heat pump testbed operation method is compared to the HiL operation method. Energetic and dynamic analyses are performed to quantify the added value of the HiL and its necessity for dynamics analysis. In the second case, the HiL testbed is used to validate a model of a single family house with a heat pump participating in a local energy market. The energetic analysis indicates a deviation of 2% and 5% for heat generation and electricity consumption of the heat pump model, respectively. The model dynamics emphasized its capability to present the dynamics of a real system with a temporal distortion of 3%.

7 May 2018 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WEWessam El-Baz
Wessam El-Baz
PTPeter Tzscheutschler
Peter Tzscheutschler
UWUlrich Wagner
Ulrich Wagner
There is a continuous growth of heat pump installations in residential buildings in Germany. The heat pumps are not only used for space heating and domestic hot water consumption but also to offer flexibility to the grid. The high coefficient of performance and the low cost of heat storages made the heat pumps one of the optimal candidates for the power to heat applications. Thus, several questions are raised about the optimal integration and control of heat pump system with buffer storages to maximize its operation efficiency and minimize the operation costs. In this paper, an experimental investigation is performed to study the performance of a ground source heat pump (GSHP) with a combi-storage under several configurations and control factors. The experiments were performed on an innovative modular testbed that is capable of emulating a ground source to provide the heat pump with different temperature levels at different times of the day. Moreover, it can emulate the different building loads such as the space heating load and the domestic hot water consumption in real-time. The data gathered from the testbed and different experimental studies were used to develop a simulation model based on Modelica that can accurately simulate the dynamics of a GSHP in a building. The model was validated based on different metrics. Energetically, the difference between the developed model and the measured values was only 3% and 4% for the heat generation and electricity consumption, respectively.