Scott R. Abella

Dr. Scott R. Abella

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 July 2022 in Biological Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MVMari‐Liis Viljur
Mari‐Liis Viljur
SAScott R. Abella
Scott R. Abella
MAMartin Adámek
Martin Adámek
JAJanderson Batista Rodrigues Alencar
Janderson Batista Rodrigues Alencar
NBNicholas A. Barber
Nicholas A. Barber
STSimon Thorn
Simon Thorn
Disturbances alter biodiversity via their specific characteristics, including severity and extent in the landscape, which act at different temporal and spatial scales. Biodiversity response to disturbance also depends on the community characteristics and habitat requirements of species. Untangling the mechanistic interplay of these factors has guided disturbance ecology for decades, generating mixed scientific evidence of biodiversity responses to disturbance. Understanding the impact of natural disturbances on biodiversity is increasingly important due to human‐induced changes in natural disturbance regimes. In many areas, major natural forest disturbances, such as wildfires, windstorms, and insect outbreaks, are becoming more frequent, intense, severe, and widespread due to climate change and land‐use change. Conversely, the suppression of natural disturbances threatens disturbance‐dependent biota. Using a meta‐analytic approach, we analysed a global data set (with most sampling concentrated in temperate and boreal secondary forests) of species assemblages of 26 taxonomic groups, including plants, animals, and fungi collected from forests affected by wildfires, windstorms, and insect outbreaks. The overall effect of natural disturbances on α‐diversity did not differ significantly from zero, but some taxonomic groups responded positively to disturbance, while others tended to respond negatively. Disturbance was beneficial for taxonomic groups preferring conditions associated with open canopies (e.g. hymenopterans and hoverflies), whereas ground‐dwelling groups and/or groups typically associated with shady conditions (e.g. epigeic lichens and mycorrhizal fungi) were more likely to be negatively impacted by disturbance. Across all taxonomic groups, the highest α‐diversity in disturbed forest patches occurred under moderate disturbance severity, i.e. with approximately 55% of trees killed by disturbance. We further extended our meta‐analysis by applying a unified diversity concept based on Hill numbers to estimate α‐diversity changes in different taxonomic groups across a gradient of disturbance severity measured at the stand scale and incorporating other disturbance features. We found that disturbance severity negatively affected diversity for Hill number q = 0 but not for q = 1 and q = 2, indicating that diversity–disturbance relationships are shaped by species relative abundances. Our synthesis of α‐diversity was extended by a synthesis of disturbance‐induced change in species assemblages, and revealed that disturbance changes the β‐diversity of multiple taxonomic groups, including some groups that were not affected at the α‐diversity level (birds and woody plants). Finally, we used mixed rarefaction/extrapolation to estimate biodiversity change as a function of the proportion of forests that were disturbed, i.e. the disturbance extent measured at the landscape scale. The comparison of intact and naturally disturbed forests revealed that both types of forests provide habitat for unique species assemblages, whereas species diversity in the mixture of disturbed and undisturbed forests peaked at intermediate values of disturbance extent in the simulated landscape. Hence, the relationship between α‐diversity and disturbance severity in disturbed forest stands was strikingly similar to the relationship between species richness and disturbance extent in a landscape consisting of both disturbed and undisturbed forest habitats. This result suggests that both moderate disturbance severity and moderate disturbance extent support the highest levels of biodiversity in contemporary forest landscapes.

SAScott R. Abella
Scott R. Abella
Disturbances such as fire, land clearing, and road building remove vegetation and can have major influences on public health through effects on air quality, aesthetics, recreational opportunities, natural resource availability, and economics. Plant recovery and succession following disturbance are poorly understood in arid lands relative to more temperate regions. This study quantitatively reviewed vegetation reestablishment following a variety of disturbances in the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts of southwestern North America. A total of 47 studies met inclusion criteria for the review. The time estimated by 29 individual studies for full reestablishment of total perennial plant cover was 76 years. Although long, this time was shorter than an estimated 215 years (among 31 individual studies) required for the recovery of species composition typical of undisturbed areas, assuming that recovery remains linear following the longest time since disturbance measurement made by the studies.

1 March 2007 in Soil Science Society of America Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SAScott R. Abella
Scott R. Abella
BZBrian W. Zimmer
Brian W. Zimmer

2 September 2011 in Journal of Applied Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EEE. Cayenne Engel
E. Cayenne Engel
SAScott R. Abella
Scott R. Abella
Summary: 1. Theories of plant succession are poorly developed in arid lands, hindering our understanding of how long communities may take to recover after disturbances such as fire. In desert landscapes vulnerable to fire, information about vegetation recovery is important when deciding whether land managers should facilitate vegetation recovery. The deserts of the southwestern USA are increasingly subject to unprecedented fires, facilitated by fuel from exotic grasses, yet management strategies are unclear.2. We evaluated post‐fire recovery patterns of perennial plant species richness and diversity, compared the rate and direction of succession between two major community types, and explored the relationship of time since fire (TSF) and other environmental factors with vegetation recovery. We sampled perennial plant communities and environmental variables (e.g. soil N) on 32 burns, ranging from 2 to 29 years TSF and each paired with their own unburned area, within a 1·8 million ha landscape in the Mojave Desert, USA.3. Species richness, diversity and composition exhibited different post‐burn recovery patterns, and recovery rates differed between community types. Specifically, diversity in Coleogyne ramosissima communities was greater in burned than unburned areas, but diversity did not differ in Larrea tridentata communities. Species composition in Larrea communities exhibited trajectories that indicate convergence with unburned community composition after 19 years TSF. Conversely, burned and unburned Coleogyne communities lacked convergence irrespective of TSF. Environmental variables (e.g. soil texture and P) accounted for 79–83% of the variation in burned species composition, suggesting environmental characteristics in part control recovery patterns.4. Synthesis and applications. The results indicate that geographically similar vegetation types within the same landscape can have markedly different post‐disturbance successional rates and trajectories. Furthermore, the persistence of fire effects varied depending on the community measure, with fire effects on species composition more long‐lasting than the effects on species diversity. This work supports (i) the use of post‐disturbance successional analyses for helping to prioritize management where it is most needed (e.g. communities not recovering naturally) and (ii) the need to assess whether persistent, early successional desert communities meet functional management objectives.

13 December 2011 in Restoration Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SAScott R. Abella
Scott R. Abella
DCDonovan J. Craig
Donovan J. Craig
SSStanley D. Smith
Stanley D. Smith
ANAlice C. Newton
Alice C. Newton

24 February 2007 in Journal of Vegetation Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DLDaniel C. Laughlin
Daniel C. Laughlin
SAScott R. Abella
Scott R. Abella
WCW. Wallace Covington
W. Wallace Covington
JGJames B. Grace
James B. Grace