Mustafa Qais Muhsin Al-Khafaji

Dr. Mustafa Qais Muhsin Al-Khafaji

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 November 2023 in Cureus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMustafa Qais Muhsin Al-Khafaji
Mustafa Qais Muhsin Al-Khafaji
NANawaf Saleh A Althobaiti
Nawaf Saleh A Althobaiti
NANusaybah Fahad M. Alhassani
Nusaybah Fahad M. Alhassani
ZAZainab Ali H. Alnahwi
Zainab Ali H. Alnahwi
WAWejdan Ahmed Aldawsari
Wejdan Ahmed Aldawsari
AAAbdulaziz Alabdulkarim
Abdulaziz Alabdulkarim
A frequent facial abnormality called chin retrusion, also known as retrognathia, can be detrimental to a person's self-esteem and overall face aesthetics. Hyaluronic acid (HA) injections are one non-surgical approach to this problem that may provide individuals seeking chin augmentation with a relatively less invasive and potentially more affordable alternative. The present literature does not provide enough in-depth systematic reviews of the use of HA in chin augmentation. By completing a complete examination of the information that is currently available, this study intends to fill this knowledge gap, supporting physicians and researchers in better comprehending the efficacy and implications of HA in chin augmentation. The safety and success of any esthetic procedure should be made based on the results reported by the patients, including satisfaction and quality of life. Patients need to receive comprehensive surgical instructions from a medical professional to optimize the results of the HA injections for chin enhancement surgery. Regardless of the reported safety of using HA injections, some unwanted side effects have also been recorded. Indeed, healthcare professionals can make more informed decisions and give a patient comprehensive information about the procedure's risks and benefits to the patients. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. EMBASE, OVID, and Google Scholar databases were searched up to June 2023. We concentrated on adult patients treated with HA for chin enhancement, and our research was limited to studies conducted in English. A total of 2,738 patients from 24 articles were studied, with 2,259 receiving HA injections for chin augmentation. When applicable, aesthetic outcomes were assessed using scales such as the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)/FACE-Q and the Galderma Chin Retrusion Scale. Patient satisfaction increased noticeably. Among the studies, some reported complications following HA injection. While three studies found no significant negative effects, one highlighted a major necrotic complication. HA has proven to be an effective and safe alternative to chin augmentation surgery, with the majority of patients showing high satisfaction rates. However, large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to obtain meaningful results, which will contribute to the further development of non-surgical cosmetic procedures. These studies may facilitate further innovation and refinement of these techniques and potentially expand the application of HA fillers in facial aesthetics.

25 November 2024 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SASiran Aslan
Siran Aslan
MAMohammad Walid Al-Smadi
Mohammad Walid Al-Smadi
Murtadha Al-KhafajiMurtadha Al-Khafaji
Murtadha Al-Khafaji
AGAndrás Gati
András Gati
MAMustafa Qais Muhsin Al-Khafaji
Mustafa Qais Muhsin Al-Khafaji
ÁVÁrpád Viola
Árpád Viola
Background/Objectives: Spinal metastases are a frequent and serious complication in cancer patients, often causing severe pain, instability, and neurological deficits. Thermal ablation techniques such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and cryoablation (CA) have emerged as minimally invasive treatments. These techniques rely on precise imaging guidance to effectively target lesions while minimizing complications. This systematic review aims to compare the efficacy of different imaging modalities—computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), fluoroscopy, and mixed techniques—in guiding thermal ablation for spinal metastases, focusing on success rates and complications. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, OVID, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases, yielding 3733 studies. After screening, 51 studies met the eligibility criteria. Data on success rates, tumor recurrence, complications, and patient outcomes were extracted. Success was defined as no procedure-related mortality, tumor recurrence or expansion, or nerve injury. This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024567174). Results: CT-guided thermal ablation demonstrated high success rates, especially with RFA (75% complete success). Although less frequently employed, MRI guidance showed lower complication rates and improved soft-tissue contrast. Fluoroscopy-guided procedures were effective but had a higher incidence of nerve injury and incomplete tumor control. Mixed imaging techniques, such as CBCT-MRI fusion, showed potential for reducing complications and improving targeting accuracy. Conclusions: CT remains the most reliable imaging modality for guiding thermal ablation in spinal metastases, while MRI provides enhanced safety in complex cases. Fluoroscopy, although effective for real-time guidance, presents limitations in soft-tissue contrast. Mixed imaging techniques like CBCT-MRI fusion offer promising solutions by combining the advantages of both CT and MRI, warranting further exploration in future studies.

2 June 2026 in Archives of Plastic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HMHatan Mortada
Hatan Mortada
MAMustafa Qais Muhsin Al-Khafaji
Mustafa Qais Muhsin Al-Khafaji
ZJZainalabden E. Jefri
Zainalabden E. Jefri
KDKian Daneshi
Kian Daneshi
AAAbdulelah Alwadai
Abdulelah Alwadai
FAFeras Alshomer
Feras Alshomer
Background: Reconstructive microsurgery restores form and function after trauma, oncological resection, or congenital deformities. This study provides a bibliometric analysis of the most cited articles, identifies evidence gaps, and proposes future research priorities. Methods: The top 100 most cited articles were retrieved from Scopus on January 1, 2025, and analyzed for publication trends, authorship, themes, and impact metrics using VOSviewer and R Bibliometrix. Results: From 57,925 articles, the top 100 were selected (mean citations: 251.99 ± 207.78), predominantly in Q1 journals. Head and neck reconstruction dominated (49.5%). Hidalgo D.A. was the most frequent author, and the United States contributed nearly half of all articles. Most provided Level III–IV evidence (38.14% each); none met Level I criteria. Annual citation rates increased from 6.87 (1970s) to 16.32 (2010s). Four evolutionary phases were identified: technical feasibility, clinical refinement, evidence-based optimization, and emerging interdisciplinary standardization. Conclusions: Three critical findings emerged: (1) no Level I studies and only 7.22% Level II evidence; (2) geographic concentration with nearly half of contributions from the United States; and (3) a thematic shift from anatomical descriptions toward outcomes research. These findings provide a roadmap for advancing the field.