Various mechanisms of treatment resistance have been reported for glioblastoma (GBM) and other tumors. Resistance to immunotherapy in GBM patients may be caused by acquisition of immunosuppressive ability by tumor cells and an altered tumor microenvironment. Although novel strategies using an immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), such as anti-programmed cell death-1 antibody, have been clinically proven to be effective in many types of malignant tumors, such strategies may be insufficient to prevent regrowth in recurrent GBM. The main cause of GBM recurrence may be the existence of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment involving immunosuppressive cytokines, extracellular vesicles, chemokines produced by glioma and glioma-initiating cells, immunosuppressive cells, etc. Among these, recent research has paid attention to various immunosuppressive cells—including M2-type macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells—that cause immunosuppression in GBM microenvironments. Here, we review the epidemiological features, tumor immune microenvironment, and associations between the expression of immune checkpoint molecules and the prognosis of GBM. We also reviewed various ongoing or future immunotherapies for GBM. Various strategies, such as a combination of ICI therapies, might overcome these immunosuppressive mechanisms in the GBM microenvironment.

INTELLANCE‐J was a phase 1/2 study of a potent antibody‐drug conjugate targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), depatuxizumab mafodotin (Depatux‐M), as a second‐ or first‐line therapy, alone or combined with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in 53 Japanese patients with World Health Organization (WHO) grade III/IV glioma. In second‐line arms, patients with EGFR‐amplified recurrent WHO grade III/IV glioma received Depatux‐M plus chemotherapy (temozolomide) or Depatux‐M alone regardless of EGFR status. In first‐line arms, patients with newly diagnosed WHO grade III/IV glioma received Depatux‐M plus chemoradiotherapy. The study was halted following lack of survival benefit with first‐line Depatux‐M in the global trial INTELLANCE‐1. The primary endpoint was 6‐month progression‐free survival (PFS) in patients with EGFR‐amplified tumors receiving second‐line Depatux‐M plus chemotherapy. Common nonocular treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with both second‐line and first‐line Depatux‐M included lymphopenia (42%, 33%, respectively), thrombocytopenia (39%, 47%), alanine aminotransferase increase (29%, 47%), and aspartate aminotransferase increase (24%, 60%); incidence of grade ≥3 TEAEs was 66% and 53%, respectively. Ocular side effects (OSEs) occurred in 93% of patients receiving second‐line Depatux‐M plus chemotherapy and all patients receiving second‐line Depatux‐M alone or first‐line Depatux‐M plus chemoradiotherapy. Most OSEs were manageable with dose modifications and concomitant medications. The 6‐month PFS estimate was 25.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.4‒42.6), and median PFS was 2.1 months (95% CI 1.9‒3.9) with second‐line Depatux‐M plus chemotherapy in the EGFR‐amplified subgroup. This study showed acceptable safety profile of Depatux‐M alone or plus chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy in Japanese patients with WHO grade III/IV glioma. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02590263).

Background: High-dose proton beam therapy (PBT) uses excellent dose concentricity based on the unique characteristic termed the Bragg peak. PBT is a highly feasible treatment option that improves survival in select patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). However, selection bias remains an issue in prior studies that evaluated the efficacy of PBT. The aim of the present study was to compare the survival outcomes and toxicities of high-dose PBT and conventional radiation therapy (CRT) using propensity score-matched treatment cohorts. Methods: The analysis included patients with newly diagnosed GBM treated with high-dose PBT of 96.6 Gy (RBE) or CRT of 60 Gy from 2010 to 2020. Propensity score generation and 1:1 matching of patients were performed based on the following covariates: age, sex, tumor location, extent of resection, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and pre-radiation Karnofsky performance scale score. Results: From a total of 235 patients, 26 were selected in each group by propensity score matching. The median overall survival (OS) of the PBT group was 28.3 months, while the median OS of the CRT group was 21.2 months. Although acute radiation-related toxicities were equivalent between the PBT and CRT groups, radiation necrosis as a late radiation-related toxicity was observed significantly more frequently in the PBT group. Conclusions: High-dose PBT provided significant survival benefits for patients with newly diagnosed GBM compared to CRT as shown by propensity score matching analysis. Radiation necrosis remains an issue in high-dose PBT; thus, the establishment of an effective treatment strategy centered on bevacizumab would be essential.

Despite cumulative evidence supporting the idea that gross total resection (GTR) contributes to prolonged survival of patients with glioblastoma (GBM), the survival outcome of such patients remains unsatisfactory. To develop more effective postoperative therapeutic strategies for patients who underwent GTR, identification of prognostic factors influencing survival is urgently needed. Here we retrospectively analyzed prognostic factors for patients who underwent GTR of newly diagnosed GBM, with a particular focus on the influence of the subventricular zone (SVZ) as the tumor location. Forty-eight consecutive patients with newly diagnosed GBM who underwent GTR during the initial operation were investigated. Tumor involvement of the SVZ was significantly associated with overall survival (OS). The SVZ-positive group had a significantly shorter median OS of 12.2 months, compared to 34.9 months for the SVZ-negative group. The occurrence of leptomeningeal dissemination was significantly influenced by tumor involvement of the SVZ, but was not significantly influenced by ventricular opening during surgery. We observed a statistically significant difference in OS according to radiation modality. The median OS was 36.9 months for patients treated with high-dose proton beam therapy, compared with 26.2 months for patients treated with conventional radiotherapy. We demonstrated that tumor involvement of the SVZ was associated with poor survival of patients who underwent GTR of newly diagnosed GBM, suggesting the potential need for therapeutic strategies that specifically target tumors in the SVZ. Further prospective studies to evaluate whether radiotherapy targeting the SVZ improves survival of patients with tumor involvement of the SVZ who had undergone GTR are warranted.