Green process innovation is an important strategy in the high-quality development of enterprises. Digital technology is becoming a key factor in helping businesses address environmental issues and contributes to their green process innovation and sustainable growth. Nevertheless, there is a lack of studies on how particular digital technology categories affect corporate green process innovation. Artificial intelligence (AI) is an important part of digitalization as it can provide new technical means and guidance for enterprise’s innovation of green processes. This study aims to fills this research gap by revealing the logical relationship between digital technology and the green development of enterprises. Using China’s A-share-listed companies as the research object from 2013 to 2022, this study employed a two-way fixed-effects model and investigated the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on corporate green process innovation and the moderating effect of multidimensional intellectual capital. The results revealed that AI positively impacts corporate green process innovation. Human capital, structural capital, employed capital, and relational capital strengthen this positive effect. Robustness tests validated these conclusions. This study expands the literature on digital technology and corporate green innovation and provides a reference for enterprises to implement green practices using digital technology.

This study introduces the Audit Risk Sentiment Value (ARSV), a novel audit risk proxy that leverages sentiment analysis to address limitations in traditional audit risk measures such as audit fees (LNFEE), audit hours (LNHOUR), and discretionary accruals (|MJDA|). Traditional proxies primarily capture quantitative dimensions, overlooking qualitative insights embedded in audit report narratives. By systematically analyzing sentiment and tone, ARSV captures nuanced audit risk dimensions that reflect the auditor’s risk perception. The study validates ARSV using a dataset of South Korean firms listed on the KOSPI from 2018 to 2023. The results demonstrate the ARSV’s superior explanatory power, as confirmed through the Vuong test, showing consistent performance across binary and continuous measures of explanatory language. ARSV bridges the gap between qualitative and quantitative audit risk assessments, offering significant benefits to auditors, regulators, and investors. Its ability to enhance the interpretability of audit reports improves transparency and trust in financial reporting, addressing stakeholder demands for actionable, forward-looking information. Furthermore, ARSV aligns with global trends emphasizing sustainability and accountability by integrating qualitative insights into audit practices. While this study provides robust evidence supporting ARSV effectiveness, its focus on South Korean firms may limit its generalizability. Future research should explore ARSV application in diverse regulatory and cultural contexts and refine the sentiment analysis tools using advanced machine learning techniques. Expanding ARSV to include other unstructured data, such as management commentary, could further enhance its applicability. This study marks a significant step toward modernizing audit methodologies, aligning them with evolving demands for comprehensive and transparent financial reporting. The empirical analysis reveals that ARSV outperforms traditional audit risk proxies with significantly higher explanatory power. Specifically, ARSV achieved a pseudo R² of 0.786, compared to 0.608 for LNFEE, 0.604 for LNHOUR, and 0.578 for |MJDA|. The Vuong test results further validate ARSV superiority, with Z-statistics of −12.168, −12.492, and −9.775 when compared against LNFEE, LNHOUR, and |MJDA|, respectively. The model incorporating ARSV demonstrated a 62.454 F-value and an Adjusted R² of 0.599, highlighting its robustness and reliability in audit risk assessment. These quantitative metrics underscore ARSV’s effectiveness in capturing qualitative audit risk dimensions, offering a more precise and informative measure for stakeholders.