The new Medical Licensing Regulations 2025 (Ärztliche Approbationsordnung, ÄApprO) will soon be passed by the Federal Council (Bundesrat) and will be implemented step by step by the individual faculties in the coming months. The further development of medical studies essentially involves an orientation from fact-based to competence-based learning and focuses on practical, longitudinal and interdisciplinary training. Radiation oncology and radiation therapy are important components of therapeutic oncology and are of great importance for public health, both clinically and epidemiologically, and therefore should be given appropriate attention in medical education. This report is based on a recent survey on the current state of radiation therapy teaching at university hospitals in Germany as well as the contents of the National Competence Based Learning Objectives Catalogue for Medicine 2.0 (Nationaler Kompetenzbasierter Lernzielkatalog Medizin 2.0, NKLM) and the closely related Subject Catalogue (Gegenstandskatalog, GK) of the Institute for Medical and Pharmaceutical Examination Questions (Institut für Medizinische und Pharmazeutische Prüfungsfragen, IMPP). The current recommendations of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie, DEGRO) regarding topics, scope and rationale for the establishment of radiation oncology teaching at the respective faculties are also included.

To date, oxaliplatin and irinotecan are used in combination with 5-flourouracil (5-FU) for metastatic colorectal cancer. In this study it was tested whether oxaliplatin and irinotecan and their combinations with 5-FU have an enhanced effect when treated simultaneously with ionizing radiation. In addition, it should be compared whether one combination therapy is more effective than the other. Colorectal cancer cells (HT-29) were treated with irinotecan or oxaliplatin, both alone and in combination with 5-FU, and subsequently irradiated. The cell growth, metabolic activity and proliferation of cells were investigated, and the clonogenic survival was determined. Furthermore, the assessment of radiation-induced DNA damage and the influence of the drugs and their combinations on DNA damage repair was investigated. Treatment with irinotecan or oxaliplatin in combination with 5-FU inhibited proliferation and metabolic activity as well as clonogenic survival and the DNA damage repair capacity of the tumor cells. The comparison of oxaliplatin and irinotecan with simultaneous irradiation showed the same effect of both drugs. When oxaliplatin or irinotecan was combined with 5-FU, tumor cell survival was significantly lower than with monotherapy; however, there was no superiority of either combination regimen. Our results have shown that the combination of 5-FU and irinotecan is as effective as the combination of 5-FU with oxaliplatin. Therefore, our data support the use of FOLFIRI as a radiosensitizer.

To enhance the treatment of tumors that are resistant to radio- and chemotherapy while minimizing the side effects of radiochemotherapy, researchers are continuously seeking new active compounds for use in combination with radiotherapy. Therefore, the aim of our study was to examine the cytotoxic and radiosensitizing effects of an extract from St. John’s Wort (Hypericum perforatum), referred to as HP01, on human epithelial tumor cells in vitro. The growth of MCF-7 (breast carcinoma) and HT-29 (colon carcinoma) cells was examined under the influence of HP01. In combination with radiation, the effects of HP01 on cytotoxicity and long-term survival were assessed using a colony formation assay. The number of DNA double-strand breaks was analyzed using the γH2AX assay, while cell cycle distribution was examined via flow cytometry. A growth-inhibiting and cytotoxic effect was observed for both tumor cell lines starting at a concentration of 10 µg/mL HP01. Treatment with HP01 resulted in an inhibition of clonogenic survival of tumor cells after ionizing radiation (6 Gy). The number of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in tumor cells increased with HP01 treatment, but the repair of radiation-induced DNA DSBs was not affected. Cell cycle analysis revealed that HP01, in addition to radiation, enhanced G2/M arrest in MCF-7 and HT-29 cells. Overall, HP01 not only showed a growth-inhibiting effect but also demonstrated a radiosensitizing effect on human tumor cells for the first time. We conclude that the HP01-induced G2/M accumulation of cells may be the main rationale for the drug-induced radiosensitivity. It is therefore a promising candidate for combined therapy in tumor diseases and warrants further investigation.

Radiotherapy is an established treatment for low-grade primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma. Recommendations on its use differ internationally, which prompted our group to conduct this analysis. Twenty-two institutions participated in this international study. Patient eligibility required a diagnosis of limited (T1/T2) primary cutaneous marginal zone or follicle center lymphoma treated with radiotherapy between 1995 and 2023. Data were collected retrospectively until February 2024 within the framework of the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group. Overall, 535 patients were analyzed. Predominant locations were the head (40%) and trunk (36%). Radiotherapy had a median dose of 24 Gy in fractions of 2 Gy. Complete responses were observed in 91% at a median time of 3.6 months following radiotherapy. There was no statistically significant difference between treatments ≤4 Gy and >4 Gy for complete or overall response rates (P = .077 and P = .056, respectively). However, there was an inferior duration of local control with ≤4 Gy (5-year local control 73% ± 12% vs 96% ± 2%; P< .001). Radiation dose was the main prognostic factor in the univariate and multivariable Cox analysis; however, higher doses did not translate into an overall survival benefit. Toxicities rarely exceeded grade 2 but were more frequent in the >4 Gy group. Radiotherapy remains an effective treatment option for indolent skin lymphoma with low toxicity. High response rates are observed with low doses of ≤4 Gy. In comparison to conventional doses, these treatments have a shorter duration of local control but a favorable toxicity profile.

Background: Liquid biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure investigating tumor mutations. Methods: In our retrospective study, we investigated whether molecular therapy monitoring of patients receiving neoadjuvant radio(chemo)therapy on a daily routine is possible in 17 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Six patients received short-course radiotherapy (5 × 5 Gy) with subsequent surgery, six patients were treated according RAPIDO protocol with short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy (FOLFOX4) and subsequent surgery and five patients received conventional neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with 5-FU followed by surgery. Response was assessed by Dworak. Liquid biopsies were taken before and immediately after neoadjuvant radiotherapy to isolate and ultradeeply sequence cell free DNA with a panel of 127 genes. Somatic mutations were determined bioinformatically by comparison with normal DNA from leukocytes to distinguish them from germline variants or aging mutations. Results: In 12 patients (71%) at least one somatic mutation was detected. In 8/12 patients a decrease and in 4/12 an increase or mixed response in ctDNA was seen. Statistical correlation between ctDNA analysis and clinical response could not be seen. Conclusion: ctDNA is responding to neoadjuvant therapy and liquid biopsy is easily integrated into a daily routine. As part of translational research this protocol leaves room for further investigations.

Rectal cancer disproportionately affects the elderly population, with more than half of cases diagnosed in individuals aged 70 years or older. Frail patients in this group often face significant challenges tolerating the standard treatment of total mesorectal excision (TME), due to elevated risks of surgical complications and perioperative morbidity. Advances in radiotherapy techniques offer a viable alternative, providing effective tumor control while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. Recent clinical trials, including OPERA and MORPEUS, have demonstrated that dose-escalated radiotherapy, which integrates external beam (chemo)radiotherapy (EBRT) with high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (HDR-BT) or contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB), can achieve high clinical response rates and facilitate organ preservation in younger, healthier patient cohorts. Building on these findings, the ACO/ARO/AIO-22 study seeks to adapt these innovative approaches to meet the needs of elderly and frail patients with rectal cancer. The ACO/ARO/AIO-22 trial is a prospective multicentre controlled trial. Elderly (age ≥70 years) and/or frail patients with non-metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma (cT1-3d N0/+ M0, mrCRM − / +) localized 0–16 cm from the ano-cutaneous line, unable to undergo radical surgery can be included. The initial treatment comprises an external beam radiation (EBRT) regime with 13 × 3 Gy (total: 39 Gy) over a period of two and a half weeks. Following initial restaging 6.5 weeks after completion of EBRT, endorectal HDR-BT will be delivered with 3 weekly fractions of 8 Gy to a total dose of 24 Gy (prescribed at the radial margin of the tumor; with a maximum prescription depth of 10 mm); alternatively, with CXB with 90 Gy in 3 weekly fractions. The primary objective is complete or near complete clinical response (cCR or ncCR) and the second primary endpoint is quality of life (QoL) measured with the EORTC QLQ-ELD14, both at 12 months after treatment start. The ACO/ARO/AIO-22 prospective multicentre trial will evaluate organ preservation rates and QoL after combining EBRT with endorectal HDR-BT in elderly and/or frail patients with rectal cancer. Trial Registration: Clinicialtrials.gov number: NCT06729645.