Anterior bone grafting is an established and frequently used treatment option for recurrent anterior shoulder instability in combination with significant glenoid bone loss. Several open and arthroscopic fixation techniques have been presented to this field in recent years. Some of these techniques are associated with different peri‐ and postoperative problems or complications. Therefore, the technical gold standard for anterior bone grafting has not been determined, resulting in an ongoing evolvement of bone‐grafting techniques. Arthroscopic, metal‐free fixation procedures were introduced to the field bone grafting to overcome previous problems of screw fixation. These metal‐free techniques frequently include surgically challenging transglenoidal drilling and are placing anterior soft tissues and neurovascular structures at risk. We therefore present an arthroscopic anterior, PEEK (polyether ether ketone)–anchor based, interconnecting bone‐grafting technique bypassing previous challenges to restore the anterior glenoid bone stock with adequate positioning and fixation of the bone graft. Technique Video: video See video under supplementary data.

Background/Objectives: Classical reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with a high neck–shaft angle (NSA) of 155° has shown satisfactory outcomes. However, newer RSA designs aim to improve results by modifying the stem design. This study evaluates the 5-year outcomes of a stem design featuring a rectangular metadiaphyseal fixation and a 135° NSA. Methods: This prospective bicentric case series included and longitudinally followed up patients that were treated for cuff arthropathy, massive irreparable rotator cuff tears, or eccentric osteoarthritis using a non-cemented rectangular metadiaphyseal fixation stem with a 135° NSA (Univers Revers, Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA). Subjective and objective functional outcome scores (Constant–Murley Score (CS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV)), range of motion (ROM), radiographic outcome, adverse events, complications, and quality of life were investigated. Results: This study enrolled 132 patients (59% female, mean age 75 years, SD 6). At the 5-year follow-up, subjective and objective outcomes significantly improved compared to baseline: CS (32.9 to 71.7, p < 0.001), SPADI (38.7 to 86.2, p < 0.001), and SSV (43.0 to 84.1, p < 0.001). ROM improved in flexion (80° to 142.4°, p < 0.001), abduction (71.5° to 130.2°, p < 0.001), internal rotation (p < 0.001), internal rotation at 90° abduction (12.7° to 45.0°, p < 0.001), and abduction strength (0.8 kg to 5.2 kg, p < 0.001). External rotation remained unchanged (32.1° to 32.0°, p = 0.125), but external rotation at 90° abduction improved (20.9° to 52.7°, p < 0.001). No signs of implant migration, subsidence, shift, tilt, alignment loss, or wear were observed, but scapular bone spur formation (11%), scapular notching grade 1 (10%), bone resorption (10%), and partial humeral radiolucent lines (1%) were reported. Conclusions: Rectangular stems with metadiaphyseal fixation and a 135° neck–shaft angle in RSA consistently improve shoulder function, showing no aseptic loosening and minimal radiological changes at 5 years.

Background: The management of irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears with an isolated loss of external rotation presents significant challenges. Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer in conjunction with medialized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has been employed to rectify external rotation deficits; however, lateralized RTSA designs may yield similar outcomes with a reduced incidence of complications. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of lateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty without latissimus dorsi tendon transfer against medialized RTSA with LDT in patients with ILER and a positive external rotation lag sign. Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved 34 patients diagnosed with CTA and severe external rotation deficiency, characterized by a positive ER lag sign and 0° active ER. The patients were treated with either lateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (n = 21) or medialized RTSA with LDT (n = 13). Outcomes evaluated preoperatively and at the 24-month follow-up comprised range of motion, ER lag sign, Constant–Murley Score, SPADI, and radiographic offset parameters. Statistical analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and baseline values. Results: At follow-up, 70% of patients undergoing lateralized RTSA exhibited resolution of ER lag, compared to 23% in the LDT group (p < 0.05). Active external rotation improvement was more significant in the LDT group (34.6° compared to 18.5°, p < 0.05). However, both groups exhibited comparable final external rotation and functional scores (CMS: 63 ± 9 vs. 63 ± 16; SPADI: 73 ± 20 vs. 74 ± 22). Lateralized RTSA demonstrated superior preservation of internal rotation, as evidenced by a higher percentage of patients achieving a negative Apley scratch test (67% compared to 23%, p < 0.05). A greater glenoidal offset correlated with improved postoperative external rotation and resolution of external rotation lag. The influence of teres minor integrity was more significant in the LDT group. Conclusions: Lateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty without latissimus dorsi tendon transfer provides similar functional restoration of external rotation in irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear patients, accompanied by reduced complications, shorter surgical durations, and improved preservation of internal rotation. LDT has the potential to provide enhanced ER gains from a low baseline; however, it is characterized by increased invasiveness and technical complexity. Prosthetic lateralization is a biomechanically effective method for restoring external rotation in patients with rotator cuff arthropathy and external rotation deficits.

Case Two months after anterior shoulder dislocation and spontaneous reduction, a 41-year-old man presented movement-related shoulder pain and a functional deficit. An initially missed osteochondral shearing injury of the humeral head with a Bankart lesion was diagnosed. Due to an extensive posteroinferior defect, an open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using bioabsorbable chondral darts was performed. At the 1-year follow-up, magnetic resonance images showed a completely healed osteochondral fragment and the patient presented an unrestricted shoulder function. Conclusion Even in missed osteochondral shear injuries, ORIF with bioabsorbable implants can be associated with an excellent functional outcome and sufficient integrity of the fragment. The absorbable implants are biocompatible, therefore the risk of revision surgery due to implant irritations is minimized.