Recent studies demonstrate that early molecular response to tyrosine-kinase inhibitors is strongly predictive of outcome in chronic myeloid leukemia patients and that early response landmarks may identify patients at higher risk for transformation who would benefit from an early switch to second-line therapy. In this study, we evaluated the ability of the control gene GUS to identify relevant thresholds for known therapeutic decision levels (BCR-ABL1/ABL1IS = 10% and 0.1%). We then defined the most relevant cut-offs for early molecular response markers (transcript level at 3 months, halving time and log reduction between diagnosis and 3 months of treatment) using GUS or ABL1. We demonstrated that, although both control genes could be used (in an equivalent way) to accurately assess early molecular response, the BCR-ABL1/GUS level at diagnosis is impacted by the higher GUS copy number over-expressed in CML cells, thus negatively impacting its ability to completely replace ABL1 at diagnosis. Furthermore, we pointed out, for the first time, that it would be helpful to monitor BCR-ABL1 levels at an earlier time point than that currently performed, in order to assess response to first-line tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and consider a potential switch of therapy as early as possible. We evaluated this optimal time point as being 19 days after the start of treatment in our cohort.
Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN), including myelodysplastic neoplasms (t-MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML), have emerged as significant late complications after CAR T cell therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 539 patients with B cell lymphoma treated with CD19 directed CAR T cell therapy across four French centers. Cumulative incidences of t-MN was estimated with relapse or death treated as competing risk. Univariate and propensity score matching (PSM) analyses were conducted to assess risk factors with age and the number of prior treatments as covariates. After a median follow-up of 25 months, the cumulative incidence of t-MN was 4.5% at 2 years. T-MN occurred predominantly as t-MDS (62%) and t-AML (38%) with high cytogenetic risk. Median overall survival after t-MN diagnosis was 4.5 months. In univariate analysis, older age (p < 0.01), higher MCV (p < 0.01), and higher ICANS grade (p = 0.04) were associated with increased risk of t-MN. After PSM, MCV and ICANS grade remained significant risk factors. CAR T cell products with CD28 co-stimulatory domains trended towards higher t-MN risk (p = 0.09). NGS analysis showed that 85.7% of t-MN had pre-existing mutations, most commonly TP53. This study highlights t-MN as a severe late complication of CAR T cell therapy. MCV and ICANS grade were identified as key risk factors.
A robust prognostic and biological classification for newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma (FL) using molecular profiling remains challenging. FL tumors from patients treated in the RELEVANCE trial with rituximab-chemotherapy (R-chemo) or rituximab-lenalidomide (R2) were analyzed using RNA sequencing, DNA sequencing, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Unsupervised gene clustering identified 2 gene expression signatures (GSs) enriched in normal memory (MEM) B cells and germinal center (GC) B-cell signals, respectively. These 2 GSs were combined into a 20-gene predictor (FL20) to classify patients into MEM-like (n = 160) or GC-like (n = 164) subtypes, which also displayed different mutational profiles. In the R-chemo arm, patients with MEM-like FL had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than patients with GC-like FL (hazard ratio [HR], 2.13; P = .0023). In the R2 arm, both subtypes had comparable PFS, demonstrating that R2 has a benefit over R-chemo for patients with MEM-like FL (HR, 0.54; P = .011). The prognostic value of FL20 was validated in an independent FL cohort with R-chemo treatment (GSE119214 [n = 137]). An IHC algorithm (FLcm) that used FOXP1, LMO2, CD22, and MUM1 antibodies was developed with significant prognostic correlation with FL20. These data indicate that FL tumors can be classified into MEM-like and GC-like subtypes that are biologically distinct and clinically different in their risk profile. The FLcm assay can be used in routine clinical practice to identify patients with MEM-like FL who might benefit from therapies other than R-chemo, such as the R2 combination. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01476787 and #NCT01650701.
The analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) released by tumor cells holds great promise for patients with lymphoma, to refine the diagnostic procedure, clarify the prognosis, monitor the response to treatment, and detect relapses earlier. One of the main challenges of the coming years is to adapt techniques from highly specialized translational teams to routine laboratories as this requires a careful technical and clinical validation, and we have to achieve this as fast as possible to transform a promising biomarker into a routine analysis to have a direct consequence on patient care. Whatever the analytical technology used, the prerequisite is to obtain high yields of ctDNA of optimal quality. In this review, we propose a step-by-step description of the preanalytical process to obtain high-quality ctDNA, emphasizing the technical choices that need to be made and the experimental data that can support these choices.