Background and Purpose: To investigate the prevalence of malnutrition risk in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) at admission, the association between malnutrition risk and long-term outcomes, and whether the predictive ability would be improved after adding to previous prognostic models for poor outcomes. Methods: Based on the Third China National Stroke Registry data from August 2015 to March 2018, we evaluated malnutrition risk using objective scores, including the controlling nutritional status score, geriatric nutritional risk index, and prognostic nutritional index. The primary outcome was death or major disability (modified Rankin Scale score ≥3) at 1 year after stroke onset. We calculated the crude prevalence of malnutrition risk and investigated the association between malnutrition risk and clinical outcomes. Prognostic performance of 3 objective malnutrition scores for poor outcomes was assessed. Results: Moderate to severe malnutrition risk was identified in 5.89%, 5.30%, and 1.95% of the Third China National Stroke Registry AIS patients according to the controlling nutritional status score, geriatric nutritional risk index, and prognostic nutritional index, respectively. At 1-year follow-up, 1143 participants (13.5%) experienced death or major disability. After adjustment for traditional risk factors, moderate to severe malnutrition risk was associated with high risk of composite events (odds ratio, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.75–2.90], for controlling nutritional status score; odds ratio, 2.10 [95% CI, 1.63–2.69], for geriatric nutritional risk index; odds ratio, 3.36 [95% CI, 2.33–4.84], for prognostic nutritional index; all P <0.01). Addition of the 3 malnutrition scores to different predicted scales (iScore and Acute Stroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne) improved predictive ability for long-term poor outcomes validated by the integrated discrimination index (all P <0.05). Conclusions: The prevalence of moderate or severe malnutrition risk in Chinese patients with AIS ranged from 1.95% to 5.89%. Malnutrition risk in patients with AIS was associated with increased risk of long-term death and major disability. Our study provides evidence supporting the prognostic significance of objective malnutrition scores after AIS.

Aims: The monocyte to high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (MHR) has emerged as a novel inflammatory biomarker of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, it has not yet been identified whether MHR can predict the long‐term prognosis of ischemic stroke. We aimed to investigate the associations of MHR levels with clinical outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) at 3 months and 1 year.Methods: We derived data from the Third China National Stroke Registry (CNSR‐III). Enrolled patients were divided into four groups by quartiles of MHR. Multivariable Cox regression for all‐cause death and stroke recurrence and logistic regression for the poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 3–6) were used.Results: Among 13,865 enrolled patients, the median MHR was 0.39 (interquartile range, 0.27–0.53). After adjustment for conventional confounding factors, the MHR level in quartile 4 was associated with an increased risk of all‐cause death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10–1.90), and poor functional outcome (odd ratio [OR], 1.47; 95% CI, 1.22–1.76), but not with stroke recurrence (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.85–1.21) at 1 year follow‐up, compared with MHR level in quartile 1. Similar results were observed for outcomes at 3 months. The addition of MHR to a basic model including conventional factors improved predictive ability for all‐cause death and poor functional outcome validated by the C‐statistic and net reclassification index (all p < 0.05).Conclusions: Elevated MHR can independently predict all‐cause death and poor functional outcome in patients with ischemic stroke or TIA.

Background It remains unclear if intensive antiplatelet and statin treatments begun within 24–72 hours of cerebral ischaemic events from intracranial or extracranial atherosclerosis is effective or safe. Methods The Intensive Statin and Antiplatelet Therapy for High-risk Intracranial or Extracranial Atherosclerosis (INSPIRES) trial is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre and 2×2 factorial trial. 6100 individuals between the ages of 35 and 80 who have experienced a mild ischaemic stroke or high-risk transient ischaemic attack (TIA) within the previous 72 hours that is attributed to ≥50% atherosclerotic stenosis of a major intracranial or extracranial artery or multiple infarctions of atherosclerotic origin will be enrolled in the trial. Eligible subjects will be randomised 1:1:1:1 to one of four groups: (1) intensive antiplatelet therapy (combined clopidogrel and aspirin for days 1–21, then aspirin placebo and clopidogrel for days 22–90) plus immediate intensive statin therapy(atorvastatin at a dose of 80 mg daily for the first 21 days, then 40 mg daily for days 22–90); (2) intensive antiplatelet therapy plus delayed intensive statin therapy (atorvastatin placebo for days 1–3, followed by 40 mg per day of atorvastatin for days 4–90); (3) standard antiplatelet therapy (combination of clopidogrel placebo with aspirin for 90 days) plus immediate intensive statin therapy and (4) standard antiplatelet therapy plus delayed intensive statin therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint is any new stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) within 90 days after randomisation. The primary safety endpoint is moderate to severe bleeding at 90 days. Conclusion The INSPIRES trial will assess the efficacy and safety of intensive antiplatelet therapy and immediate intensive statin therapy begun within 72 hours of onset in decreasing the recurrent stroke at 90 days in patients with acute mild ischaemic stroke or high-risk TIA of intracranial or extracranial atherosclerosis origin. Trial registration number NCT03635749.

Stroke rehabilitation improves functional recovery among stroke patients. However, little is known about clinical practice in China regarding the assessment and provision of rehabilitation among patients with acute ischemic stroke. We examined the frequency and determinants of an assessment for rehabilitation among acute ischemic stroke patients from the China National Stroke Registry II. Data for 19,294 acute ischemic stroke patients admitted to 219 hospitals from June 2012 to January 2013 were analyzed. The multivariable logistic regression model with the generalized estimating equation method accounting for in-hospital clustering was used to identify patient and hospital factors associated with having a rehabilitation assessment during the acute hospitalization. Among 19,294 acute ischemic stroke patients, 11,451 (59.4%) were assessed for rehabilitation. Rates of rehabilitation assessment varied among 219 hospitals (IQR 41.4% vs 81.5%). In the multivariable analysis, factors associated with increased likelihood of a rehabilitation assessment (p < 0.05) included disability prior to stroke, higher NIHSS on admission, receipt of a dysphagia screen, deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, carotid vessel imaging, longer length of stay, and treatment at a hospital with a higher number of hospital beds (per 100 units). In contrast, patients with a history of atrial fibrillation and hospitals with higher number of annual stroke discharges (per 100 patients) were less likely to receive rehabilitation assessment during the acute stroke hospitalization. Rehabilitation assessment among acute ischemic stroke patients was suboptimal in China. Rates varied considerably among hospitals and support the need to improve adherence to recommended care for stroke survivors.

In this study, we tested the effect of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel on platelet reactivity in patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). A pre-specified subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial was conducted. Platelet reactivity was assessed by thrombelastography (TEG) platelet mapping. Patients were divided into carriers and non-carriers according to the carrier status of CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) alleles. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HOPR) (defined as maximum amplitude induced by adenosine diphosphate > 47mm) at 90±7 days. Clinical outcomes within 90±7 days were followed up. Among 339 patients, 170 were randomized to ticagrelor/aspirin and 169 to clopidogrel/aspirin. Compared with clopidogrel/aspirin, the proportion of HOPR at 90±7 days in ticagrelor/aspirin was significantly lower (12.2% versus 30.0%, P < 0.001). Ticagrelor/aspirin had a lower proportion of HOPR among carriers (11.0% versus 35.6%, P < 0.001), but not among non-carriers (13.5% versus 22.4%, P = 0.17). Ticagrelor was superior to clopidogrel in inhibiting platelet reactivity measured by TEG platelet mapping among patients with acute minor stroke or TIA, particularly in carriers of the CYP2C19 LOF alleles. Large randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings.

Background: It is unclear whether infarct location affects stroke recurrence after index ischemic stroke. We aimed to compare the risk of stroke recurrence and the responses to dual antiplatelets with ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin between patients with posterior circulation infarct (PCI) and those with anterior circulation infarct (ACI) after minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. Methods: Data were obtained from the double-blind CHANCE-2 trial (Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel With Aspirin in High-Risk Patients With Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events II), which was conducted across 202 centers in China from September 2019 to March 2021. Patients with positive diffusion-weighted imaging were included and classified into PCI and ACI groups according to the hyperintense lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were a new stroke and severe or moderate bleeding within 90 days, respectively. Results: A total of 4168 patients were included in this substudy, with 1427 PCI and 2741 ACI. During the 90-day follow-up, the risk of stroke recurrence in patients with PCI was similar to that with ACI (7.4% versus 8.3%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.79–1.29]; P =0.94). In comparison with clopidogrel-aspirin, ticagrelor-aspirin significantly reduced the risk of stroke recurrence in both the PCI (hazard ratio, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.40–0.89]; P =0.01) and ACI groups (hazard ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.50–0.85]; P =0.002). There was no treatment-by-infarct location interaction ( P value for interaction, 0.92). The risk of severe or moderate bleeding was similar between PCI and ACI patients ( P =0.19). However, the risk of any bleeding increased on ticagrelor-aspirin than clopidogrel-aspirin treatment in PCI and ACI patients ( P =0.02 and 0.002, respectively). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that stroke recurrence was similar between PCI and ACI in patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack. Additionally, ticagrelor-aspirin was superior to clopidogrel-aspirin in reducing the risk of stroke within 90 days in both PCI and ACI patients. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04078737.