Carboplatin increases the pathological complete remission (pCR) rate in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) when added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, however, evidence on its effect on survival outcomes is controversial. The study was prospectively registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021228386). We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, and conference proceedings from January 1, 2004 to January 30, 2022 for relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC patients, with carboplatin in the intervention arm and standard anthracycline taxane (AT) in the control arm. PRISMA guidelines were used for this review. Data were pooled using fixed and random effects models as appropriate on extracted hazard ratios (HR). Individual patient data (IPD)for disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were extracted from published survival curves of included RCTs; DFS and OS curves for each trial and the combined population were reconstructed, and HR estimated. The primary outcome was DFS; OS, pCR, and toxicity were secondary outcomes. Eight trials with 2425 patients were included. Carboplatin improved DFS (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.78; I² 45%, p < 0.001) compared with AT at trial level and IPD level (HR 0.66; 95%CI, 0.55 to 0.80, p < 0.001) analysis. The OS also improved with carboplatin at both trial level (HR 0.69, 95%CI 0.50 to 0.95, I² 41%, p = 0.02) and IPD level (HR 0.68; 95%CI, 0.54 to 0.87, p = 0.002) analysis. The pCR as expected, was better in the carboplatin arm (OR 2.11; 95% CI = 1.44–3.08; I² 67%, p = 0.009). Anaemia and thrombocytopaenia were higher in the carboplatin arm. and relevance: Carboplatin added to (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC improves survival, as shown in both trial level and IPD analysis.

The treatment landscape for EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) has evolved significantly with multiple combination regimens demonstrating superiority over single agent Osimertinib over the past two years. Recent trials such as FLAURA2 and MARIPOSA have explored intensified front-line regimens, with FLAURA2 demonstrating improvement in PFS with the addition of chemotherapy to Osimertinib and MARIPOSA, showing both a PFS and OS benefit with a novel combination regimen of Amivantamab and Lazertinib. However, these regimens are associated with significantly higher toxicity to patients and pose a huge financial and logistical burden to the health care system; therefore, treatment selection must therefore be individualized, considering disease biology, patient fitness, and toxicity burden. Post-progression strategies remain challenging due to resistance mechanisms like EGFR C797S mutations and MET amplification and the lack of data post-progression on novel first-line combinations. Ongoing trials are investigating fourth-generation EGFR TKIs, MET inhibitors, antibody–drug conjugates, and bispecific antibodies in subsequent lines. While regimens like Amivantamab-Lazertinib show promise even in second-line settings, toxicity, cost, and access remain barriers. As therapeutic options expand, biomarker-driven sequencing and personalized care will be critical to optimizing long-term outcomes in EGFR-mutated mNSCLC.

PURPOSE: Published experience with autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) from the Indian subcontinent is extremely limited. Here, we describe the activity and outcomes of this treatment modality at a large tertiary care center in India. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed adult patients with NHL who were eligible for ASCT and autografted between January 1, 2002, and December 15, 2020, at our transplant unit. Toxicities, complications, and long-term outcomes were compared between patients who underwent transplant during 2002-2012 (group A) and 2013-2020 (group B). RESULTS: Overall, 80 patients (group A, n = 37; group B, n = 43) underwent ASCT using peripheral blood stem cells. At a median follow-up of 57.6 months, the 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 43.5% and 47.6%, respectively, for all patients. More recently (group B), patients had reduced 100-day transplant-related mortality (2.3% v 21.6%, P < .01), improved 3-year EFS (52.9% v 37.3%, P = .04), and superior OS (at 3-year; 63.4% v 43.2%, P = .02). Patients in group B also tolerated the procedure better, with improved resource utilization. In multivariate analysis, an International Prognostic Index (IPI) ≥ 3 at diagnosis adversely affected EFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.82, P = .009) and OS (HR = 2.84, P = .01) after ASCT. Low pretransplant serum albumin levels were associated with inferior EFS (HR = 2.68, P = .02) and transplant-related mortality (odds ratio = 10.80, P = .02) after ASCT. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to achieve comparable short- and long-term outcomes in patients with NHL undergoing ASCT in a resource-poor country with improved supportive care and expertise of the transplant team and center.

Introduction: The optimal treatment of estrogen receptor-positive (ER +) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after progression on cyclin-dependent 4/6 kinase inhibitors (CDK4/6i) is unknown. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of phase-II/-III randomized trials of ER + MBC post CDK4/6i + ET progression. We calculated the hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using generic inverse variance and odds ratios (ORs) using the Mantel–Haenszel method for adverse events (AEs) with Review-Manager version-5.4. NMA was executed using WINBUGS (Microsoft Excel). Three molecular subgroups were analyzed: HER2-low, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, and the ESR1 mutation subgroup for selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD). Results: A total of 14 studies were included. In the HER2-low group, Sacituzumab govitecan and trastuzumab deruxtecan had a similar efficacy (HR, 95% CI): PFS (0.98; 0.63–1.43) and OS (1.08; 0.76–1.55). In PI3K/AKT/mTOR-altered cases, capivasertib was superior to alpelisib PFS (0.77; 0.53–1.12), and OS (0.80; 0.48–1.35). SERDs had worse PFS and OS versus ongoing CDK 4/6i (ribociclib). Conclusion: No therapy emerged as the unequivocal choice in the post-CDK 4/6i domain in unselected subgroups. In the HER2-low population, a similar efficacy and different toxicity spectrum was seen. In AKT-altered tumors, capivasertib was less toxic than alpelisib. PROSPERO ID: CRD4202236412.