Shu Ning Wai

Ms. Shu Ning Wai


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 December 2024 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLSu Lin Lim
Su Lin Lim
MTMelissa Hui Juan Tay
Melissa Hui Juan Tay
SASiew Min Ang
Siew Min Ang
SWShu Ning Wai
Shu Ning Wai
KOKai Wen Ong
Kai Wen Ong
CKChin Meng Khoo
Chin Meng Khoo
Introduction: The ketogenic diet (KD) is widely used for weight management by reducing appetite, enhancing fat oxidation, and facilitating weight loss. However, the high content of total and saturated fats in a conventional KD may elevate low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels, a known risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, highlighting the need for healthier alternatives. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a newly developed Healthy Ketogenic Diet (HKD) versus an Energy-Restricted Diet (ERD) on weight loss and metabolic outcomes among adults with obesity. Methods: Multi-ethnic Asian adults (n = 80) with body mass index ≥ 27.5 kg/m2 were randomized either to HKD (n = 41) or ERD (n = 39) for 6 months. Both groups followed an energy-restricted healthy diet, emphasizing on reducing saturated and trans fats. The HKD group additionally limited net carbohydrate intake to no more than 50 g per day. Dietary adherence was supported via the Nutritionist Buddy app with dietitian coaching. The primary outcome was weight change from baseline at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included weight change at 3 months and 1 year, along with changes in metabolic profiles. Data were analyzed using linear regression with an intention-to-treat approach. Results: The HKD group achieved significantly greater mean weight loss at 6 months than the ERD group (−7.8 ± 5.2 kg vs. −4.2 ± 5.6 kg, p = 0.01). The mean weight loss percentage at 6 months was 9.3 ± 5.9% and 4.9 ± 5.8% for the HKD and ERD groups, respectively (p = 0.004). Improvements in metabolic profiles were also significantly better in the HKD group [glycated hemoglobin (−0.3 ± 0.3% vs. −0.1 ± 0.2%, p = 0.008), systolic blood pressure (−7.7 ± 8.9 mmHg vs. −2.6 ± 12.2 mmHg, p = 0.005), and aspartate transaminase (−7.6 ± 15.5 IU/L vs. 0.6 ± 11.5 IU/L, p = 0.01)], with no increase in LDL-cholesterol (−0.12 ± 0.60 mmol/L vs. −0.04 ± 0.56 mmol/L, p = 0.97) observed in either group. Conclusions: The HKD was more effective than the ERD in promoting weight loss and improving cardiometabolic outcomes without elevation in LDL-cholesterol. It can be recommended for therapeutic intervention in patients with obesity.