Alejandro Ibáñez-Costa

Dr. Alejandro Ibáñez-Costa

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 November 2013 in Journal of Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Manuel D. GaheteManuel D. Gahete
Manuel D. Gahete
DRDavid Rincón-Fernández
David Rincón-Fernández
AVAlicia Villa-Osaba
Alicia Villa-Osaba
DHDaniel Hormaechea-Agulla
Daniel Hormaechea-Agulla
AIAlejandro Ibáñez-Costa
Alejandro Ibáñez-Costa
Raul LuqueRaul Luque
Raul Luque
Ghrelin is a 28-amino acid acylated hormone, highly expressed in the stomach, which binds to its cognate receptor (GHSR1a) to regulate a plethora of relevant biological processes, including food intake, energy balance, hormonal secretions, learning, inflammation, etc. However, ghrelin is, in fact, the most notorious component of a complex, intricate regulatory system comprised of a growing number of alternative peptides (e.g. obestatin, unacylated ghrelin, and In1-ghrelin, etc.), known (GHSRs) and, necessarily unknown receptors, as well as modifying enzymes (e.g. ghrelin-O-acyl-transferase), which interact among them as well as with other regulatory systems in order to tightly modulate key (patho)-physiological processes. This multiplicity of functions and versatility of the ghrelin system arise from a dual, genetic and functional, complexity. Importantly, a growing body of evidence suggests that dysregulation in some of the components of the ghrelin system can lead to or influence the development and/or progression of highly concerning pathologies such as endocrine-related tumors, inflammatory/cardiovascular diseases, and neurodegeneration, wherein these altered components could be used as diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic targets. In this context, the aim of this review is to integrate and comprehensively analyze the multiple components and functions of the ghrelin system described to date in order to define and understand its biological and (patho)-physiological significance.

16 March 2023 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLise Mangiante
Lise Mangiante
NANicolas Alcala
Nicolas Alcala
ASAlexandra Sexton-Oates
Alexandra Sexton-Oates
AGAlex Di Genova
Alex Di Genova
AGAbel Gonzalez-Perez
Abel Gonzalez-Perez
LFLynnette Fernandez-Cuesta
Lynnette Fernandez-Cuesta
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive cancer with rising incidence and challenging clinical management. Through a large series of whole-genome sequencing data, integrated with transcriptomic and epigenomic data using multiomics factor analysis, we demonstrate that the current World Health Organization classification only accounts for up to 10% of interpatient molecular differences. Instead, the MESOMICS project paves the way for a morphomolecular classification of MPM based on four dimensions: ploidy, tumor cell morphology, adaptive immune response and CpG island methylator profile. We show that these four dimensions are complementary, capture major interpatient molecular differences and are delimited by extreme phenotypes that—in the case of the interdependent tumor cell morphology and adapted immune response—reflect tumor specialization. These findings unearth the interplay between MPM functional biology and its genomic history, and provide insights into the variations observed in the clinical behavior of patients with MPM.

1 April 2015 in Cancer Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Raul LuqueRaul Luque
Raul Luque
AIAlejandro Ibáñez-Costa
Alejandro Ibáñez-Costa
LNLeonardo Vieira Neto
Leonardo Vieira Neto
GTGiselle F. Taboada
Giselle F. Taboada
DHDaniel Hormaechea-Agulla
Daniel Hormaechea-Agulla
Justo CastañoJusto Castaño
Justo Castaño

1 October 2013 in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Raul LuqueRaul Luque
Raul Luque
AIAlejandro Ibáñez-Costa
Alejandro Ibáñez-Costa
LLL. M. López-Sánchez
L. M. López-Sánchez
LJL. Jiménez-Reina
L. Jiménez-Reina
EVE. Venegas-Moreno
E. Venegas-Moreno
Justo CastañoJusto Castaño
Justo Castaño
Desmopressin is a synthetic agonist of vasopressin receptors (AVPRs). The desmopressin stimulation test is used in the diagnosis and postsurgery prognosis of Cushing disease (CD). However, the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the desmopressin-induced ACTH increase in patients with CD are poorly understood. The objectives of this study were to determine, for the first time, whether desmopressin acts directly and exclusively on pituitary corticotropinoma cells to stimulate ACTH expression/release and to elucidate the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in desmopressin-induced ACTH increase in CD. A total of 8 normal pituitaries (NPs), 23 corticotropinomas, 14 nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas, 17 somatotropinomas, and 3 prolactinomas were analyzed for AVPR expression by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Primary cultures derived from corticotropinomas, nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas, somatotropinomas, prolactinomas, and NPs were treated with desmopressin, and ACTH secretion/expression, [Ca(2+)]i kinetics, and AVPR expression and/or proliferative response were evaluated. The relationship between AVPR expression and plasma adrenocorticotropin/cortisol levels obtained from desmopressin tests was assessed. Desmopressin affects all functional parameters evaluated in corticotropinoma cells but not in NPs or other pituitary adenomas cells. These effects might be due to the dramatic elevation of AVPR1b expression levels found in corticotropinomas. In line with this notion, the use of an AVPR1b antagonist completely blocked desmopressin stimulatory effects. Remarkably, only AVPR1b expression was positively correlated with elevated plasma adrenocorticotropin levels in corticotropinomas. The present results provide a cellular and molecular basis to support the desmopressin stimulation test as a reliable, specific test for the diagnosis and postsurgery prognosis of CD. Furthermore, our data indicate that AVPR1b is responsible for the direct/exclusive desmopressin stimulatory pituitary effects observed in CD, thus opening the possibility of exploring AVPR1b antagonists as potential therapeutic tools for CD treatment.

1 November 2016 in Journal of Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AIAlejandro Ibáñez-Costa
Alejandro Ibáñez-Costa
EREsther Rivero-Cortés
Esther Rivero-Cortés
MVMari C Vázquez-Borrego
Mari C Vázquez-Borrego
Manuel D. GaheteManuel D. Gahete
Manuel D. Gahete
LJLuis Jiménez-Reina
Luis Jiménez-Reina
Justo CastañoJusto Castaño
Justo Castaño
Somatostatin analogs (SSA) are the mainstay of pharmacological treatment for pituitary adenomas. However, some patients escape from therapy with octreotide, a somatostatin receptor 2 (sst2)-preferring SSA, and pasireotide, a novel multi-sst-preferring SSA, may help to overcome this problem. It has been proposed that correspondence between sst1-sst5 expression pattern and SSA-binding profile could predict patient’s response. To explore the cellular/molecular features associated with octreotide/pasireotide response, we performed a parallel comparison of their in vitro effects, evaluating sst1-sst5 expression, intracellular Ca2+ signaling ([Ca2+]i), hormone secretion and cell viability, in a series of 85 pituitary samples. Somatotropinomas expressed sst5>sst2, yet octreotide reduced [Ca2+]i more efficiently than pasireotide, while both SSA similarly decreased growth hormone release/expression and viability. Corticotropinomas predominantly expressed sst5, but displayed limited response to pasireotide, while octreotide reduced functional endpoints. Non-functioning adenomas preferentially expressed sst3 but, surprisingly, both SSA increased cell viability. Prolactinomas mainly expressed sst1 but were virtually unresponsive to SSA. Finally, both SSA decreased [Ca2+]i in normal pituitaries. In conclusion, both SSA act in vitro on pituitary adenomas exerting both similar and distinct effects; however, no evident correspondence was found with the sst1-sst5 profile. Thus, it seems plausible that additional factors, besides the simple abundance of a given sst, critically influence the SSA response.

1 January 2022 in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AIAlejandro Ibáñez-Costa
Alejandro Ibáñez-Costa
CPCarlos Pérez-Sánchez
Carlos Pérez-Sánchez
APAlejandra María Patiño-Trives
Alejandra María Patiño-Trives
MLMaria Luque-Tevar
Maria Luque-Tevar
PFPilar Font
Pilar Font
CLChary López-Pedrera
Chary López-Pedrera
Objectives To characterise splicing machinery (SM) alterations in leucocytes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to assess its influence on their clinical profile and therapeutic response. Methods Leucocyte subtypes from 129 patients with RA and 29 healthy donors (HD) were purified, and 45 selected SM elements (SME) were evaluated by quantitative PCR-array based on microfluidic technology (Fluidigm). Modulation by anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy and underlying regulatory mechanisms were assessed. Results An altered expression of several SME was found in RA leucocytes. Eight elements (SNRNP70, SNRNP200, U2AF2, RNU4ATAC, RBM3, RBM17, KHDRBS1 and SRSF10) were equally altered in all leucocytes subtypes. Logistic regressions revealed that this signature might: discriminate RA and HD, and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) positivity; classify high-disease activity (disease activity score-28 (DAS28) >5.1); recognise radiological involvement; and identify patients showing atheroma plaques. Furthermore, this signature was altered in RA synovial fluid and ankle joints of K/BxN-arthritic mice. An available RNA-seq data set enabled to validate data and identified distinctive splicing events and splicing variants among patients with RA expressing high and low SME levels. 3 and 6 months anti-TNF therapy reversed their expression in parallel to the reduction of the inflammatory profile. In vitro, ACPAs modulated SME, at least partially, by Fc Receptor (FcR)-dependent mechanisms. Key inflammatory cytokines further altered SME. Lastly, induced SNRNP70-overexpression and KHDRBS1-overexpression reversed inflammation in lymphocytes, NETosis in neutrophils and adhesion in RA monocytes and influenced activity of RA synovial fibroblasts. Conclusions Overall, we have characterised for the first time a signature comprising eight dysregulated SME in RA leucocytes from both peripheral blood and synovial fluid, linked to disease pathophysiology, modulated by ACPAs and reversed by anti-TNF therapy.