This review examines the integration of blockchain technology with the IoT in the Marine Internet of Things (MIoT) and Internet of Underwater Things (IoUT), with applications in areas such as oceanographic monitoring and naval defense. These environments present distinct challenges, including a limited communication bandwidth, energy constraints, and secure data handling needs. Enhancing BIoT systems requires a strategic selection of computing paradigms, such as edge and fog computing, and lightweight nodes to reduce latency and improve data processing in resource-limited settings. While a blockchain can improve data integrity and security, it can also introduce complexities, including interoperability issues, high energy consumption, standardization challenges, and costly transitions from legacy systems. The solutions reviewed here include lightweight consensus mechanisms to reduce computational demands. They also utilize established platforms, such as Ethereum and Hyperledger, or custom blockchains designed to meet marine-specific requirements. Additional approaches incorporate technologies such as fog and edge layers, software-defined networking (SDN), the InterPlanetary File System (IPFS) for decentralized storage, and AI-enhanced security measures, all adapted to each application’s needs. Future research will need to prioritize scalability, energy efficiency, and interoperability for effective BIoT deployment.

This study evaluates leadership uniformity—the degree to which the proposer role is evenly distributed among validator nodes over time—in Quorum-based Byzantine Fault Tolerance (QBFT), a Byzantine Fault-Tolerant (BFT) consensus algorithm used in permissioned blockchain networks. By introducing simulated follower timeouts derived from uniform, normal, lognormal, and Weibull distributions, it models a range of network conditions and latency patterns across nodes. This approach integrates Raft-inspired timeout mechanisms into the QBFT framework, enabling a more detailed analysis of leader selection under different network conditions. Three leader selection strategies are tested: Direct selection of the node with the shortest timeout, and two quorum-based approaches selecting from the top 20% and 30% of nodes with the shortest timeouts. Simulations were conducted over 200 rounds in a 10-node network. Results show that leader selection was most equitable under the Weibull distribution with shape $k=0.5$, which captures delay behavior observed in real-world networks. In contrast, the uniform distribution did not consistently yield the most balanced outcomes. The findings also highlight the effectiveness of quorum-based selection: While choosing the node with the lowest timeout ensures responsiveness in each round, it does not guarantee uniform leadership over time. In low-variability distributions, certain nodes may be repeatedly selected by chance, as similar timeout values increase the likelihood of the same nodes appearing among the fastest. Incorporating controlled randomness through quorum-based voting improves rotation consistency and promotes fairer leader distribution, especially under heavy-tailed latency conditions. However, expanding the candidate pool beyond 30% (e.g., to 40% or 50%) introduced vote fragmentation, which complicated quorum formation in small networks and led to consensus failure. Overall, the study demonstrates the potential of timeout-aware, quorum-based leader selection as a more adaptive and equitable alternative to round-robin approaches, and provides a foundation for developing more sophisticated QBFT variants tailored to latency-sensitive networks.

The emergence of blockchain technology has resulted in the creation of various blockchain networks and their accompanying programming languages for creating smart contracts. Each smart contract language, with its unique characteristics, advantages, and drawbacks, leverages blockchain technology to create a secure, transparent, and efficient way to execute agreements without the need for intermediaries. In this study, we compared the Solidity language used in the Ethereum blockchain network and Sui Move, which is used for the Sui blockchain network, highlighting contrasting approaches to smart contract development. In this paper, we explore the aspects of both languages, such as their structure, operational models, and security components. By evaluating these factors, the study uncovers the strengths and limitations of each language, highlighting their security and performance features that developers must take into account when choosing a smart contract language to build robust, efficient, and scalable decentralized applications that are addressed at a wide audience. Additionally, the work entails a framework that helps developers transition existing applications built on Solidity to Sui Move and take advantage of Sui Move’s unique characteristics without sacrificing functionality. It is a step-by-step approach to modify data forms, refactor logic processes, and deploy modules as needed while ensuring that migration is smooth and the maximum benefits of the Sui-based blockchain network are achieved. The knowledge and resources offered are designed to enable developers to create more secure, scalable, and efficient decentralized systems.