Medium- to long-term retrospective evaluation of clinical and radiographic outcome in the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases with hybrid posterior fixation. Thirty patients were included with the mean age of 47.8 years (range 35 to 60 years). All patients underwent posterior lumbar instrumentation using hybrid fixation for lumbar stenosis with instability (13 cases), degenerative spondylolisthesis Meyerding grade I (6 cases), degenerative disc disease of one or more adjacent levels in six cases and mild lumbar degenerative scoliosis in five patients. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using Oswestry disability index (ODI), Roland and Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ), and the visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores. All patients were assessed by preoperative, postoperative and follow-up standing plain radiographs and lateral X-rays with flexion and extension. Adjacent disc degeneration was also evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at follow-up. At a mean follow-up of 6.1 years, we observed on X-rays and/or MRI 3 cases of adjacent segment disease (10.0 %): two of them (6.6 %) presented symptoms and recurred a new surgery. The last patient (3.3 %) developed asymptomatic retrolisthesis of L3 not requiring revision surgery. The mean preoperative ODI score was 67.6, RMDQ score was 15.1, VAS back pain score was 9.5, and VAS leg pain score was 8.6. Postoperatively, these values improved to 28.1, 5.4, 3.1, and 2.9, respectively, and remained substantially unchanged at the final follow-up: (27.7, 5.2, 2.9, and 2.7, respectively). After 5-year follow-up, hybrid posterior lumbar fixation presented satisfying clinical outcomes in the treatment of degenerative disease.

Objectives: Severe early-onset scoliosis (EOS) can be addressed by different growth-friendly approaches, although the indications of each technique remain controversial. The aim of this study was to compare, in a large series of patients, the potential and limitations of the different distraction-based surgical techniques to establish the most suitable surgical approach to treat EOS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study evaluating 62 EOS cases treated between January 2002 and December 2021 with a traditional growing rod (TGR), a magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) and vertical expandable prosthesis titanium ribs (VEPTR) at IRCSS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy. The patients included had a mean age of 7 years and a mean follow-up of 36 months. The COBB angle was measured on x-rays at preoperative, early postoperative, and end of follow-up, and complications were recorded. Results: in our cohort, VEPTR was mainly used in congenital scoliosis (50% vs. a mean value of 25.8%) and syndromic scoliosis (42.9% vs. a mean value of 25.8%). MCGR was mainly used in idiopathic scoliosis (73.9% vs. an average value of 41.9%). TGR was mostly used in muscular neurology EOS (16% vs. an average value of 6.5%). The collected data show a similar deformity correction rate in growing-rod implants in VEPTR, TGR, and MCGR. The mean curve reduction was 25.8 95% CI (21.8–29.8) (p < 0.0005). Compared with preoperative measurements, significant differences in curve magnitude correction between subgroups occurred at the final treatment measurements, when patients with MCGR had a significantly larger correction (53.2° ± 20.84 in %33.9 con DS ± 14.27) than VEPTR (27.12°± 19.13 in %19.7° ± 13.7). Conclusions: Different growing-rod techniques are applied based on EOS etiology. While all EOS etiologies benefited from this surgical approach, congenital EOS had poorer results. Overall, MCGR has been the preferred option for idiopathic EOS and appears to be the most effective in correcting the primary curve.

Introduction Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) has been shown to be safe and effective in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) correction, even though there is no consensus on which treatment provides the best results. Methods and analysis The present study will be a randomised controlled trial with allocation 1:1. We will enrol 126 patients with Cobb≤70° undergoing AIS surgery. Patients will be divided into two groups, according to a randomisation list unknown to the surgeons. Group 1 will be treated with posterior spine fusion and group 2 with MISS. MISS technique: two midline noncontiguous skin incisions of 3 cm in length, 3–4 segments (6–8 pedicles screws) instrumented per skin incision, uniplanar and polyaxial pedicle screws inserted bilaterally on each side of the proximal and distal levels, rod translation manoeuvre and C–D manoeuvre performed on the distal part. Clinical and radiological follow-ups will be performed for 5 years. Values of Cobb angles degrees will be collected to study the correction rate of the structural major curve. Postoperative and preoperative anterior-posterior (AP) direct radiography will be compared with the last follow-up examination. Operative time, preoperative haemoglobin (Hb) and second postoperative day Hb, full length of hospitalisation, time to achieve verticalisation and time to remove the drainage will be recorded. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) medium score will be assessed immediately after surgery and during the whole postoperative rehabilitation treatment to estimate pain reduction. Complications will be collected postoperatively and throughout the whole follow-up period. Moreover, questionnaires will be administered at follow-up (NRS, Scoliosis Research Society-22 and Oswestry Disability Index) for the clinical assessment. Ethics and dissemination The study protocol has been approved by the local ethic committee Area Vasta Emilia Romagna Centro. Written informed consent will be collected for all the participants. Findings of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. Trial registration number NCT05860673.

Background/Objectives: Surgery for adolescent idiopathic deformities is often aimed at improving aesthetic appearance, striving for the best possible correction. However, severe and rigid scoliotic curves not only present aesthetic issues but can also compromise cardiopulmonary health and cause early neurological impairment due to spinal cord compression, posing significant risks of morbidity and mortality if untreated. Conservative treatments are ineffective for severe curves, defined by scoliotic angles over 70° and flexibility below 30% on lateral bending X-rays. Treatment often requires invasive interventions, such as osteotomies and vertebral resections. In particular, posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) has shown effectiveness in realigning vertebral structures in complex cases. This study describes the efficacy and risks of PVCR through a series of cases treated at our institution. Methods: This case series was conducted at the Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute in Bologna, involving eight pediatric patients with severe, rigid spinal deformities, operated upon between 2018 and 2023. The underlying pathologies included idiopathic kyphoscoliosis, neurofibromatosis type 1, Pott’s disease, and other congenital anomalies. Preoperative assessment included standard radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography. During PVCR, motor and sensory evoked potentials were monitored to minimize neurological injury risk. Postoperative management included blood transfusions, antibiotic support, and early physiotherapy. Results: PVCR resulted in an average reduction in the Cobb angle from 86.3° preoperatively to 22.4° postoperatively, with a mean correction of 64%. The mean duration of the procedures was 337.4 min. Three patients had an uneventful postoperative course, while five developed complications, including infections and temporary neurological deficits, which were successfully managed. One patient developed an epidural hemorrhage that required emergency surgery for hematoma evacuation, with partial recovery. This study demonstrates the potential of PVCR for correcting rigid spinal deformities, highlighting the importance of postoperative management to minimize the associated risks. Conclusions: Posterior vertebral resection techniques offer significant promise in the correction of pediatric spinal deformities. Although ours is a small case series, it can provide important data for such treatment. Long-term monitoring is needed to fully understand the impact of these procedures and to further refine surgical techniques.

Introduction: Currently, static interbody cages are the gold standard for achieving solid arthrodesis in the spine, enhancing segmental stability, obtaining neuroforaminal decompression, and improving as well as maintaining segmental lordosis. It is well known that restoring sagittal balance and segmental lordosis is crucial for long-term outcomes in lumbar spine fusion. For some cases, expandable interbody cages are emerging as an alternative to static cages. This study aims to evaluate the radiographic outcomes and complications of standard open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Methods: A standard open TLIF procedure using expandable cages was performed at 1 to 3 levels in 71 patients (129 levels in total), with a follow-up of two years. All patients underwent radiological assessments preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at one and two years postoperatively. Radiological evaluation was conducted using standing lateral X-rays. Results: Segmental lordosis (SL) increased significantly from the preoperative value (9.0° ± 3.6°) to 24 months postoperatively (15.4° ± 3.0°), with improvements maintained throughout the 24-month follow-up period (p < 0.001). Similarly, anterior disc height (ADH), posterior disc height (PDH), and foraminal height (FH) each increased significantly from preoperative to immediate postoperative measurements, and these gains were maintained over the two-year follow-up (p < 0.001 each). Lumbar lordosis increased significantly from the preoperative value (41.9° ± 10.5°) to the immediate postoperative period (45.7° ± 10.8°); however, this improvement decreased slightly at the one- and two-year follow-ups. No revisions were required for cage-related complications. One patient experienced a surgical site infection, and two patients had mechanical complications (screw loosening and proximal junctional kyphosis). Conclusions: Expandable interbody cages enable excellent restoration and maintenance of disc height and segmental lordosis in a standard open TLIF procedures at two-year. Achieving these outcomes depends on several factors, including proper preparation of the vertebral endplates, accurate cage placement and expansion, posterior facet osteotomy, and the application of posterior compression prior to final fixation. These steps are essential to fully maximize the potential of expandable cage technology.