William Howitz

Dr. William Howitz

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 December 2020 in Journal of Chemical Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WHWilliam Howitz
William Howitz
KMKate McKnelly
Kate McKnelly
RLRenée Link
Renée Link

30 August 2023 in Journal of Chemical Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KMKate McKnelly
Kate McKnelly
WHWilliam Howitz
William Howitz
TTTaylor A. Thane
Taylor A. Thane
RLRenée Link
Renée Link

6 August 2020 in Journal of Chemical Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WHWilliam Howitz
William Howitz
TTTaylor A. Thane
Taylor A. Thane
TFTaylor L. Frey
Taylor L. Frey
XWXinran S. Wang
Xinran S. Wang
JGJoe C. Gonzales
Joe C. Gonzales
KEKimberly D. Edwards
Kimberly D. Edwards

31 January 2023 in Journal of Chemical Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WHWilliam Howitz
William Howitz
TFTaylor Frey
Taylor Frey
SSShannon J. Saluga
Shannon J. Saluga
MNMelanie Nguyen
Melanie Nguyen
KDKameryn Denaro
Kameryn Denaro
KEKimberly D. Edwards
Kimberly D. Edwards
This paper describes the creation of a theme-based first quarter, of a two quarter sequence, general chemistry laboratory course following an argument driven inquiry format and employing specifications grading. The course contains four, two-week projects investigating the chemistry of a popular sports drink. The sugar content, dye concentration, buffering capacity, and the kinetics of dye decomposition are investigated for various flavors of Gatorade. Specifications grading is used to foster teamwork and to provide an opportunity for revision and resubmission of student work. A modified LCAS survey measured student perception of course content.

22 May 2023 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AKAdam G. Kreutzer
Adam G. Kreutzer
GGGretchen Guaglianone
Gretchen Guaglianone
SYStan Yoo
Stan Yoo
CPChelsea Marie T. Parrocha
Chelsea Marie T. Parrocha
SRSarah M. Ruttenberg
Sarah M. Ruttenberg
JNJames S. Nowick
James S. Nowick
The assembly of the β-amyloid peptide (Aβ) to form oligomers and fibrils is closely associated with the pathogenesis and progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Aβ is a shape-shifting peptide capable of adopting many conformations and folds within the multitude of oligomers and fibrils the peptide forms. These properties have precluded detailed structural elucidation and biological characterization of homogeneous, well-defined Aβ oligomers. In this paper, we compare the structural, biophysical, and biological characteristics of two different covalently stabilized isomorphic trimers derived from the central and C -terminal regions Aβ. X-ray crystallography reveals the structures of the trimers and shows that each trimer forms a ball-shaped dodecamer. Solution-phase and cell-based studies demonstrate that the two trimers exhibit markedly different assembly and biological properties. One trimer forms small soluble oligomers that enter cells through endocytosis and activate capase-3/7-mediated apoptosis, while the other trimer forms large insoluble aggregates that accumulate on the outer plasma membrane and elicit cellular toxicity through an apoptosis-independent mechanism. The two trimers also exhibit different effects on the aggregation, toxicity, and cellular interaction of full-length Aβ, with one trimer showing a greater propensity to interact with Aβ than the other. The studies described in this paper indicate that the two trimers share structural, biophysical, and biological characteristics with oligomers of full-length Aβ. The varying structural, assembly, and biological characteristics of the two trimers provide a working model for how different Aβ trimers can assemble and lead to different biological effects, which may help shed light on the differences among Aβ oligomers.

14 January 2025 in Education Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WHWilliam Howitz
William Howitz
KMKate McKnelly
Kate McKnelly
RLRenée Link
Renée Link
Specifications grading is an alternative grading system that has been used with increasing frequency in higher education. Since first introduced by Linda Nilson in 2014, more than 90 publications on the design and implementation of specifications grading systems have been published. This work presents a systematic review of the current literature to analyze the variety of ways specifications grading systems are executed, including the diverse design and implementation considerations, as well as to present and discuss emergent themes. We analyzed 90 publications and present their relevant findings in the results. The following databases were last searched on 5 October 2024 for publications: IEEE Xplore, ACS Publications, ASEE PEER, PER, Scopus, ERIC, ACM, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science. All peer-reviewed journal articles, conference proceedings, and book chapters that implemented at least two structural features of specifications grading in an undergraduate or graduate course were included in this review. Theses, dissertations, conference abstracts, posters, workshops, blogs, opinion pieces, social media exchanges, and content provided on websites were not included. Additionally, reports of specifications grading systems in K-12 courses or those that only presented the design and/or implementation of less than two structural features of the grading system were similarly excluded. Our findings from the literature reveal that the following themes emerge from educators who use specifications grading: instructor commentary on time investment, academic performance, and student reactions to specifications grading. This review provides a resource for those interested in exploring this alternative grading system, and the emergent themes indicate that there are ripe opportunities for future study.