Background/Objectives: The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on health was significant worldwide. The measures adopted to limit the spread of the virus had an indirect effect on the epidemiology of other infectious diseases with similar mechanisms of inter-human transmission. The present literature review analyzed the scenario of pediatric acute respiratory infections in the post-lockdown period compared to the pre-pandemic and lockdown periods. The different patterns of viruses’ outbreaks were evaluated according to the type of local COVID-19 restrictive measures and to the type of pathogen. Methods: Relevant scientific literature published between March 2020 and November 2024 was identified by means of electronic keyword searches in the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Results: Worldwide implementation of non-pharmacological public health interventions aimed at limiting the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a measurable effect on the circulation of other common respiratory viruses, significantly affecting their usual seasonality. Most viruses significantly reduced their activity during the lockdown period but returned to or exceeded historical levels after discontinuation of preventive non-pharmacological measures. For many respiratory viruses, particularly respiratory syncytial virus, an off-season increase was reported. Conclusions: The non-pharmacological interventions, which effectively helped limit the COVID-19 pandemic, resulted in relevant epidemiologic changes in most common respiratory viruses. Given the different seasonality and clinical severity observed for some pathogens after lockdown, possible future off-season or more severe epidemics should be expected.

Background: Although, in most children with asthma, good symptom control is achieved with a low to moderate dose of inhaled corticosteroids, a small group of patients still experiences frequent symptoms, and even severe exacerbations, impairment of lung function, and reduced quality of life. Some of these subjects with severe asthma require biologic drugs as add-on therapy. In the past decade, numerous monoclonal antibodies have been approved for children or adolescents with severe asthma, in addition to their increasing use in adult asthma. However, the available evidence on how to select the most appropriate biologic based on a single patient’s clinical, functional, and laboratory characteristics is still scant, and is insufficient to guide clinicians in the decision-making process of a personalized treatment. Materials and Methods: We report a case series of four patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, and review the existing literature on this treatment in children and adolescents. Results: Our patients, all with blood eosinophilia and elevated fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels, developed poor symptom control despite prolonged treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a second controller, addressing the addition of a biologic drug. In all of them, a 12-month treatment with subcutaneous mepolizumab showed a reduction in the blood eosinophil count and in asthma exacerbations, as well as an improvement on the Asthma Control Test. The results of the literature search focused on the strengths and limitations of the pediatric use of mepolizumab and highlighted the areas worthy of further research. Conclusions: Mepolizumab has proven effective in improving symptom control in pediatric patients with severe asthma. Additional well-powered clinical trials will be helpful in developing evidence-based guidelines regarding biologic drugs in the pediatric population.

Background/Objectives: Bronchiolitis is the leading cause of hospitalization in infants under 12 months. While often self-limiting, a subset of cases evolves into severe disease requiring intensive care. This study aimed to identify risk factors for severe bronchiolitis in two consecutive respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) seasons (before and after the introduction of nirsevimab) in Southern Italy. Methods: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted on all infants ≤12 months hospitalized with bronchiolitis from October 2023 to March 2025. Patients were categorized by disease severity: those requiring Sub-Intensive or Intensive Care (IC group) and others (n-IC group). Demographic and clinical data, virological testing, and therapeutic interventions were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for severe disease. Results: Among 1056 hospitalized infants, 10.5% required intensive care. RSV was detected in 73.5% of tested patients and was significantly associated with severe outcomes. Independent risk factors for IC admission included younger age (<3 months), comorbidities, and RSV infection. A 33% reduction in bronchiolitis admissions was observed in the second season (post-nirsevimab), although the rate of severe cases remained stable (about 10% in both seasons). Conclusions: Younger age, comorbidities, and RSV infection are significant predictors of severe bronchiolitis. Although overall admissions decreased post-nirsevimab, severe cases persisted. These findings underscore the need for targeted preventive strategies and highlight the potential role of intermediate care approaches in managing bronchiolitis severity.

Acute fulminant myocarditis is a rare event in children, accounting for about 10% of all cases of acute myocarditis. Its lack of specific onset patterns and unpredictable evolution make diagnosis and prompt treatment challenging. We observed six cases of fulminant myocarditis admitted to our Pediatric Emergency Unit (Campania region, Sothern Italy) within a very short timeframe (50 days, from July to September 2024). Three of them died, and two are still under treatment in a Pediatric Cardiologic Intensive Care Unit in critical condition. In only one case, cardiac function improved. The described cases were not geographically linked, belonging to different areas of Southern Italy. No common etiological agent was found. Given the relatively low incidence of the condition, the occurrence of six pediatric myocarditis within approximately two months should be considered exceptional. Careful monitoring of further cases in the next few months should be warranted.

Background: Parapneumonic effusion is a common complication of community-acquired pneumonia and can range from a simple inflammatory transudate to an organized purulent collection, known as empyema. Progression to empyema significantly worsens the prognosis, leading to increased morbidity, longer hospital stays, and a greater need for invasive interventions. Several risk factors for pleural effusion and progression to empyema have been identified, but the absence of standardized criteria underline the need for better risk stratification. We analyzed clinical and laboratory data from a cohort of children hospitalized with pneumonia associated with pleural effusion or empyema, to identify predictive risk factors associated with these complications. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical and laboratory data from patients admitted to our Pediatric Emergency Department with pneumonia complicated by pleural effusion and compared patients with simple effusion to those with empyema. Results: Seventeen children with simple pleural effusion and eighteen with empyema were enrolled. Patients with empyema had higher absolute neutrophil count, higher levels of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and ferritin, and lower serum albumin levels. Furthermore, they took a longer time for normalization of inflammatory markers when compared with those with pleural effusion. Invasive interventions, such as pleural drainage, and the need for intensive care were more frequent in the empyema group. Conclusions: Pleural effusion and empyema are two common complications of pediatric community-acquired pneumonia. Children developing pleural empyema have higher inflammatory markers and lower levels of serum albumin compared to patients with simple pleural effusion. Morbidity is significantly worse in children with empyema as they are more prone to require invasive interventions and intensive care.