William C.W. Chen

Prof. William C.W. Chen


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 August 2012 in Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMihaela Crisan
Mihaela Crisan
MCMirko Corselli
Mirko Corselli
WCWilliam C.W. Chen
William C.W. Chen
BPBruno Peault
Bruno Peault
Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC) are currently the best candidate therapeutic cells for regenerative medicine related to osteoarticular, muscular, vascular and inflammatory diseases, although these cells remain heterogeneous and necessitate a better biological characterization. We and others recently described that MSC originate from two types of perivascular cells, namely pericytes and adventitial cells and contain the in situ counterpart of MSC in developing and adult human organs, which can be prospectively purified using well defined cell surface markers. Pericytes encircle endothelial cells of capillaries and microvessels and express the adhesion molecule CD146 and the PDGFRβ, but lack endothelial and haematopoietic markers such as CD34, CD31, vWF (von Willebrand factor), the ligand for Ulex europaeus 1 (UEA1) and CD45 respectively. The proteoglycan NG2 is a pericyte marker exclusively associated with the arterial system. Besides its expression in smooth muscle cells, smooth muscle actin (αSMA) is also detected in subsets of pericytes. Adventitial cells surround the largest vessels and, opposite to pericytes, are not closely associated to endothelial cells. Adventitial cells express CD34 and lack αSMA and all endothelial and haematopoietic cell markers, as for pericytes. Altogether, pericytes and adventitial perivascular cells express in situ and in culture markers of MSC and display capacities to differentiate towards osteogenic, adipogenic and chondrogenic cell lineages. Importantly, adventitial cells can differentiate into pericyte‐like cells under inductive conditions in vitro. Altogether, using purified perivascular cells instead of MSC may bring higher benefits to regenerative medicine, including the possibility, for the first time, to use these cells uncultured.

21 October 2014 in Stem Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WCWilliam C.W. Chen
William C.W. Chen
JBJames E. Baily
James E. Baily
MCMirko Corselli
Mirko Corselli
MDMary E. Díaz
Mary E. Díaz
BSBin Sun
Bin Sun
BPBruno Peault
Bruno Peault
Perivascular mesenchymal precursor cells (i.e., pericytes) reside in skeletal muscle where they contribute to myofiber regeneration; however, the existence of similar microvessel‐associated regenerative precursor cells in cardiac muscle has not yet been documented. We tested whether microvascular pericytes within human myocardium exhibit phenotypes and multipotency similar to their anatomically and developmentally distinct counterparts. Fetal and adult human heart pericytes (hHPs) express canonical pericyte markers in situ, including CD146, NG2, platelet‐derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) β, PDGFRα, alpha‐smooth muscle actin, and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain, but not CD117, CD133, and desmin, nor endothelial cell (EC) markers. hHPs were prospectively purified to homogeneity from ventricular myocardium by flow cytometry, based on a combination of positive‐ (CD146) and negative‐selection (CD34, CD45, CD56, and CD117) cell lineage markers. Purified hHPs expanded in vitro were phenotypically similar to human skeletal muscle‐derived pericytes (hSkMPs). hHPs express mesenchymal stem/stromal cell markers in situ and exhibited osteo‐, chondro‐, and adipogenic potentials but, importantly, no ability for skeletal myogenesis, diverging from pericytes of all other origins. hHPs supported network formation with/without ECs in Matrigel cultures; hHPs further stimulated angiogenic responses under hypoxia, markedly different from hSkMPs. The cardiomyogenic potential of hHPs was examined following 5‐azacytidine treatment and neonatal cardiomyocyte coculture in vitro, and intramyocardial transplantation in vivo. Results indicated cardiomyocytic differentiation in a small fraction of hHPs. In conclusion, human myocardial pericytes share certain phenotypic and developmental similarities with their skeletal muscle homologs, yet exhibit different antigenic, myogenic, and angiogenic properties. This is the first example of an anatomical restriction in the developmental potential of pericytes as native mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 2015;33:557–573

1 January 2016 in Stem Cells International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Arman SaparovArman Saparov
Arman Saparov
Vyacheslav OgayVyacheslav Ogay
Vyacheslav Ogay
TNTalgat Nurgozhin
Talgat Nurgozhin
MJMedet Jumabay
Medet Jumabay
WCWilliam C.W. Chen
William C.W. Chen
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have attracted the attention of researchers and clinicians for their ability to differentiate into a number of cell types, participate in tissue regeneration, and repair the damaged tissues by producing various growth factors and cytokines, as well as their unique immunoprivilege in alloreactive hosts. The immunomodulatory functions of exogenous MSCs have been widely investigated in immune‐mediated inflammatory diseases and transplantation research. However, a harsh environment at the site of tissue injury/inflammation with insufficient oxygen supply, abundance of reactive oxygen species, and presence of other harmful molecules that damage the adoptively transferred cells collectively lead to low survival and engraftment of the transferred cells. Preconditioning of MSCs ex vivo by hypoxia, inflammatory stimulus, or other factors/conditions prior to their use in therapy is an adaptive strategy that prepares MSCs to survive in the harsh environment and to enhance their regulatory function of the local immune responses. This review focuses on a number of approaches in preconditioning human MSCs with the goal of augmenting their capacity to regulate both innate and adaptive immune responses.

1 October 2009 in Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WCWilliam C.W. Chen
William C.W. Chen
EMElisa Montelatici
Elisa Montelatici
MCMihaela Crisan
Mihaela Crisan
MCMirko Corselli
Mirko Corselli
JHJohnny Huard
Johnny Huard
BPBruno Péault
Bruno Péault

1 December 2013 in Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RBRichard J. Bodnar
Richard J. Bodnar
MRMargaret E. Rodgers
Margaret E. Rodgers
WCWilliam C.W. Chen
William C.W. Chen
Alan WellsAlan Wells
Alan Wells
Objective—: To understand the role, if any, played by pericytes in the regulation of newly formed vessels during angiogenesis. In this study, we investigate whether pericytes regulate the number of nascent endothelial tubes. Approach and Results—: Using an in vitro angiogenesis assay (Matrigel assay), we demonstrate that pericytes can inhibit vessel formation and induce vessel dissociation via CXCR3-induced involution of the endothelial cells. In a coculture Matrigel assay for cord formation, pericytes prevented endothelial cord formation of human dermal microvascular endothelial cells but not umbilical vein endothelial cells. Blockade of endothelial CXCR3 function or expression inhibited the repressing effect of the pericytes. We further show that pericytes are also able to induce regression of newly formed microvascular cords through CXCR3 activation of calpain. When CXCR3 function was inhibited by a neutralizing antibody or downregulated by siRNA, cord regression mediated by pericytes was abolished. Conclusions—: We show for the first time that pericytes regulate angiogenic vessel formation, and that this is mediated through CXCR3 expressed on endothelial cells. This suggests a role for pericytes in the pruning of immature vessels overproduced during wound repair.

19 August 2013 in Stem Cells International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WCWilliam C.W. Chen
William C.W. Chen
TPTea Soon Park
Tea Soon Park
IMIain R. Murray
Iain R. Murray
LZLudovic Zimmerlin
Ludovic Zimmerlin
Lorenza LazzariLorenza Lazzari
Lorenza Lazzari
BPBruno Peault
Bruno Peault
Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) and MSC-like multipotent stem/progenitor cells have been widely investigated for regenerative medicine and deemed promising in clinical applications. In order to further improve MSC-based stem cell therapeutics, it is important to understand the cellular kinetics and functional roles of MSCs in the dynamic regenerative processes. However, due to the heterogeneous nature of typical MSC cultures, their native identity and anatomical localization in the body have remained unclear, making it difficult to decipher the existence of distinct cell subsets within the MSC entity. Recent studies have shown that several blood-vessel-derived precursor cell populations, purified by flow cytometry from multiple human organs, give rise tobona fideMSCs, suggesting that the vasculature serves as a systemic reservoir of MSC-like stem/progenitor cells. Using individually purified MSC-like precursor cell subsets, we and other researchers have been able to investigate the differential phenotypes and regenerative capacities of these contributing cellular constituents in the MSC pool. In this review, we will discuss the identification and characterization of perivascular MSC precursors, including pericytes and adventitial cells, and focus on their cellular kinetics: cell adhesion, migration, engraftment, homing, and intercellular cross-talk during tissue repair and regeneration.