Context: Patients with acromegaly are characterized by chronic exposure to high growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 levels, known for their anabolic effect on skeletal muscle. Therefore, an increased skeletal muscle mass could be hypothesized in these individuals. Herein, we have performed a systematic revision of published evidence regarding skeletal muscle mass, quality, and performance in patients with acromegaly. Evidence Acquisition: A systematic review of the literature in the PubMed database up to September 1, 2023, was conducted with the following query: acromegaly AND (“muscle mass” OR “skeletal muscle”). We excluded studies that did not compare different disease states or used nonradiological methods for the skeletal muscle analyses, except for bioelectrical impedance analysis. Evidence Synthesis: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 360 patients were evaluated for skeletal muscle mass, 122 for muscle fatty atrophy, and 192 for muscle performance. No clear evidence of increased skeletal muscle mass in patients with active disease compared to control or healthy individuals emerged. As for skeletal muscle quality, we observed a trend toward higher fatty infiltration among patients with acromegaly compared to healthy participants. Likewise, patients with active disease showed consistently worse physical performance compared to control or healthy individuals. Conclusion: Skeletal muscle in acromegaly has lower quality and performance compared to that of healthy individuals. The small number of published studies and multiple confounding factors (eg, use of different radiological techniques) contributed to mixed results, especially regarding skeletal muscle mass. Well-designed prospective studies are needed to investigate skeletal muscle mass in patients with acromegaly.

Acromegaly is a rare endocrine disorder caused by excessive growth hormone (GH) production, due, in the vast majority of cases, to the presence of a GH-secreting pituitary tumour. The chronic elevation of GH and the resulting high circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) cause the characteristic tissue overgrowth and a number of associated comorbidities, including several metabolic changes, such as glucose intolerance and overt diabetes mellitus (DM). Elevated GH concentrations directly attenuate insulin signalling and stimulate lipolysis, decreasing glucose uptake in peripheral tissues, thus leading to the development of impaired glucose tolerance and DM. Acromegaly treatment aims to normalize plasma GH and IGF-1 levels using surgery, medical treatment, or radiotherapy. The effect of the different medical therapies on glucose homeostasis varies. This literature review explores the impact of the currently available pharmacological therapies for acromegaly (first- and second-generation somatostatin receptor ligands, a GH receptor antagonist, and dopamine agonists) on glucose homeostasis. We also discuss the underlying biological mechanisms through which they impact glucose metabolism.

Although GH and IGF-1 excess has a controversial impact on bone mineral density (BMD), acromegalic patients display variable degrees of bone structure impairment. In this study, we aim to investigate the usefulness of trabecular bone score (TBS), compared to BMD, in identifying acromegalic patients with impaired lumbar spine trabecular microarchitecture. Forty-four acromegalic patients were investigated for disease control, metabolic and gonadal status, bone metabolism parameters, and the presence of vertebral fractures (VFs). Patients and matched healthy controls underwent BMD and TBS examination. Mean TBS values were lower in patients than in controls (p < 0.001), without significant differences in mean lumbar and femoral BMD. TBS values were significantly higher in controlled patients compared to the uncontrolled ones (p = 0.012). No significant differences were found in bone markers with respect to disease control. Mean TBS or lumbar BMD did not significantly differ in patients with or without VFs (prevalence 11.4%). TBS and BMD levels were lower in hypogonadal patients compared to the eugonadal ones (p = 0.030 and p < 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, TBS values are significantly lower in patients than in controls, confirming the presence of impaired lumbar spine trabecular bone in acromegaly. Both uncontrolled disease and hypogonadism contribute to TBS deterioration in acromegaly.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 can predict response to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs) in acromegaly. Recently, we validated an open-source digital image analysis (DIA) to quantify somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2) expression. We aimed to validate the DIA also on somatostatin receptor subtype 5 (SSTR5) in a new cohort of growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary tumors, with IHC performed in a different laboratory, and to correlate fg-SRL response with SSTs expression. Somatostatin receptor subtype 2 and SSTR5 were assessed in 42 GH-secreting pituitary tumors, using a semiquantitative immunoreactivity score (IRS) and the DIA by use of the open-access software CellProfiler. The DIA calculates the staining intensity and the percentage of positive cells (%PC). We found a good correlation between IRS and DIA for both SSTR2 and SSTR5 (P < .001), demonstrating the reliability of the DIA in this setting. Response to fg-SRL treatment correlated with SSTR2, but not SSTR5, expression. Somatostatin receptor subtype 2 expression predicted response to fg-SRL. In particular, the identified cut-offs were IRS ≥ 5 (area under the curve [AUC] 0.763; sensitivity 77%; specificity 83%); intensity/area ≥0.106 (AUC 0.833; sensitivity 92%; specificity 83%); and %PC-DIA ≥63.7% (AUC 0.917; sensitivity 92%; specificity 83%). The SSTR2 %PC correlated with treatment response only when evaluated using the DIA, showing a better performance of this method.

Background/Objectives: Hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle can affect glycemic control in women with type 1 diabetes (T1D), especially during the luteal phase, when increased insulin resistance may lead to prolonged hyperglycemia. Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop (AHCL) systems could help manage these hormone-driven fluctuations. This study aimed to assess glycemic control across menstrual phases and explore the role of AHCL systems in counteracting the related glucose variability. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted including women with T1D and regular menstrual cycles (study group) and women on estroprogestin therapy (control group). Each group was subdivided by insulin delivery method (AHCL vs. non-AHCL). Glycemic metrics and insulin requirements were compared between the follicular and luteal phases, and between groups. Results: The study included 94 women (62 in the study group, 32 in the control group). In the study group, glycemic control worsened during the luteal phase, with increased average glucose, glycemic variability, and time above range > 250 mg/dL (+0.93%, p = 0.03) and reduced time in range 70–180 mg/dL. These changes were more pronounced among AHCL users, who also showed a significant increase in bolus insulin. No phase-related differences were observed in the control group or among non-AHCL users. Significantly higher insulin needs during the follicular phase were found in the study group compared with the controls. Conclusions: This study confirmed a worsening in glycemic control in women affected by T1D during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle, suggesting a need for more tailored management. The clear efficacy of AHCL systems in counteracting hormone-related glycemic fluctuations has not been proved, highlighting the need for further research in larger, more homogeneous cohorts.

Diet composition and energy intake directly modulate the growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) axis, and indirectly through endogenous regulators such as insulin, ghrelin, and adipokines. Moreover, diet has a well-established role in the prevention and management of various metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities in the general population. Acromegaly, caused by an endogenous overproduction of GH, is an endocrine disorder associated with increased risk of metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities and excess mortality. The treatment of acromegaly aims to normalize GH and IGF-1 levels, manage complications, and reduce mortality. There is a considerable gap in research regarding the specific influence of diet on biochemical control and complications in acromegaly; therefore, consensus guidelines for managing metabolic and cardiovascular complications in acromegaly generally recommend the same nutritional interventions as those for the general population, even though the underlying pathogenic mechanisms often differ. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of how nutrition modulates the GH/IGF-1 axis and to summarize current evidence on the effect of various macronutrients and dietary patterns on biochemical control and comorbidity management in patients with acromegaly. Evidence in healthy individuals suggests that diets low in animal-derived proteins, combined with moderate fat and carbohydrate intake, may lower GH/IGF-1 activity. Nevertheless, further research is needed in patients with acromegaly to determine whether dietary interventions, such as those found effective in the general population, can help achieve biochemical control and effectively manage metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities in this specific group.