As environmental awareness grows, hydrodesulfurization (HDS) catalysts have become crucial in petroleum refining, yet their use results in oil-laden waste, poses environmental risks, and complicates subsequent treatment. Efficient oil removal is thus critical for processing spent catalysts. This study systematically compares three de-oiling methods, extraction, chemical thermal washing, and pyrolysis, to identify the optimal de-oiling method. In the experiments, extraction achieves a 94.12% oil removal rate at a liquid-to-solid ratio of 10 mL/g, a temperature of 45 °C, and a time of 60 min, maintaining around 90% efficiency after five cycles of solvent recovery. Chemical thermal washing achieves an oil removal rate of 96.26% after 4 h at 90 °C, with 0.15 wt.% SDS, 3.0 wt.% NaOH, and a liquid-to-solid ratio of 10 mL/g. The heavy oil emulsion is then decomposed with 4% CuO and 5% H₂O₂. The pyrolysis method removes 96.19% of oil at 600 °C in 60 min. While the extraction and chemical thermal washing methods are effective, they produce wastewater, raising environmental concerns. In contrast, the pyrolysis method is more environmentally friendly. SEM, EDS, and FT-IR analyses show that after oil removal, the metal structures on the alumina support of the spent HDS catalyst are clearly exposed, facilitating the subsequent recovery of valuable metals.

Direct thermal decomposition of rare-earth chlorides into rare-earth oxides (REOs) in a single step presents a short-process, wastewater-free, and environmentally friendly alternative to the conventional precipitation–calcination method, which produces large amounts of saline wastewater. While earlier reviews have primarily focused on summarizing reaction conditions and thermodynamic parameters, they have seldom discussed the critical variations in pyrolysis behavior across different rare-earth elements. This review highlights a novel classification of rare-earth chlorides into fixed-valence and variable-valence groups, revealing how their respective oxidation states govern thermodynamic stability, reaction pathways, and chlorine release behavior. Furthermore, a systematic comparison is provided on the effects of additives, temperature, and gas partial pressure on product purity, particle size, and microstructure, with particular attention to the mechanisms underlying oxychloride intermediate formation. Beyond fundamental reaction principles, this work uniquely evaluates the design and performance of existing pyrolysis reactors, outlining both opportunities and challenges in scaling up direct rare-earth chloride (RECl_x) pyrolysis for industrial REO production. By integrating mechanistic insights with reactor engineering considerations, this review offers advancements over previous descriptive summaries and proposes a strategic pathway toward sustainable rare-earth processing.

As environmental awareness grows, hydrodesulfurization (HDS) catalysts have become crucial in petroleum refining, yet their use results in oil-laden waste that poses environment risks and complicates subsequent treatment. Efficient oil removal is thus critical for processing spent catalysts. This study systematically compares three de-oiling methods: extraction, chemical thermal washing, and pyrolysis, to identify the optimal de-oiling method. In the experiments, the extraction achieves 94.12% oil removal rate at a liquid-to-solid ratio of 10 mL/g and 45℃ in 60 minutes, maintaining around 90% efficiency after five cycles of solvent recovery. The chemical thermal washing achieves oil removal rate of 96.26% after 4 hours at 90℃, with 0.15 wt.% SDS, 3.0 wt.% NaOH, and a liquid-to-solid ratio of 10 mL/g. The heavy oil emulsion is then decomposed with 4% CuO and 5% H2O2. The pyrolysis method removes 96.19% of oil at 600℃ in 60 minutes. While the extraction and chemical thermal washing methods are effective, they produce wastewater, raising environmental concerns. In contrast, the pyrolysis method is more environmentally friendly. SEM, EDS, and FT-IR analyses show that after oil removal, the metal structures on the alumina support of the spent HDS catalyst are clearly exposed, facilitating the subsequent recovery of valuable metals.