This review aims to highlight the important contribution of the cerebellum in the Anticipatory Postural Adjustments (APAs). These are unconscious muscular activities, accompanying every voluntary movement, which are crucial for optimizing motor performance by contrasting any destabilization of the whole body and of each single segment. Moreover, APAs are deeply involved in initiating the displacement of the center of mass in whole-body reaching movements or when starting gait. Here we present literature that illustrates how the peculiar abilities of the cerebellum i) to predict, and contrast in advance, the upcoming mechanical events; ii) to adapt motor outputs to the mechanical context, and iii) to control the temporal relationship between task-relevant events, are all exploited in the APA control. Moreover, recent papers are discussed which underline the key role of cerebellum ontogenesis in the correct maturation of APAs. Finally, on the basis of a survey of animal and human studies about cortical and subcortical compensatory processes that follow brain lesions, we propose a candidate neural network that could compensate for cerebellar deficits and suggest how to verify such a hypothesis.

Controlling posture, i.e., governing the ensemble of involuntary muscular activities that manage body equilibrium, represents a demanding function in which the cerebellum plays a key role. Postural activities are particularly important during gait initiation when passing from quiet standing to locomotion. Indeed, several studies used such motor task for evaluating pathological conditions, including cerebellar disorders. The linkage between cerebellum maturation and the development of postural control has received less attention. Therefore, we evaluated postural control during quiet standing and gait initiation in children affected by a slow progressive generalized cerebellar atrophy (SlowP) or non-progressive vermian hypoplasia (Joubert syndrome, NonP), compared to that of healthy children (H). Despite the similar clinical evaluation of motor impairments in NonP and SlowP, only SlowP showed a less stable quiet standing and a shorter and slower first step than H. Moreover, a descriptive analysis of lower limb and back muscle activities suggested a more severe timing disruption in SlowP. Such differences might stem from the extent of cerebellar damage. However, literature reports that during childhood, neural plasticity of intact brain areas could compensate for cerebellar agenesis. We thus proposed that the difference might stem from disease progression, which contrasts the consolidation of compensatory strategies.

Introduction: We studied the postural behaviour of a 52-year-old professional mountain climber who underwent bilateral amputation of all five toes after severe frostbite.Methods: Two tasks were examined: static posturography (SP) and gait initiation (GI), both performed barefoot and with prosthetic shoes. During SP, the participant kept the upright stance for 30 s while an optoelectronic system with reflective markers recorded feet position and body sway, and two force plates measured the Center of Pressure (CoP) displacement and Ground Reaction Force (GRF) of each foot. During GI, the participant stood on the force plates for at least 10 s and then spontaneously started walking, while optoelectronic system was used to monitor heel-off events; wireless EMG probes recorded the anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) in trunk and lower limb muscles.Results: Compared to shod condition, during barefoot SP the participant showed a reduced anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) extension of the Base of Support (BoS), and the whole-body CoP shifted about 7 mm more anteriorly, approaching the “safer” geometric center of the BoS. Despite this difference, the AP and ML ranges of CoP oscillations were similar in both conditions. In GI, the trunk dorsal muscles showed different APA patterns: when barefoot they were excitatory in the trailing and inhibitory in the leading side while they were bilaterally inhibitory when shod.Discussion: In parallel to CoP shift toward a “safer” position in SP, in barefoot GI the body rotation toward the trailing side may reveal a more “cautious” approach; this also shows that different postural strategies may be adopted in GI by one and the same individual.

We recently investigated the role of the cerebellum during development, reporting that children with genetic slow-progressive ataxia (SlowP) show worse postural control during quiet stance and gait initiation compared to healthy children (H). Instead, children with genetic non-progressive ataxia (NonP) recalled the behavior of H. This may derive from compensatory networks, which are hindered by disease progression in SlowP while free to develop in NonP. In the aim of extending our findings to intra-limb postural control, we recorded, in 10 NonP, 10 SlowP and 10 H young patients, Anticipatory Postural Adjustments (APAs) in the proximal muscles of the upper-limb and preceding brisk index finger flexions. No significant differences in APA timing occurred between NonP and H, while APAs in SlowP were delayed. Indeed, the excitatory APA in Triceps Brachii was always present but significantly delayed with respect to both H and NonP. Moreover, the inhibitory APAs in the Biceps Brachii and Anterior Deltoid, which are normally followed by a late excitation, could not be detected in most SlowP children, as if inhibition was delayed to the extent where there was overlap with a late excitation. In conclusion, disease progression seems to be detrimental for intra-limb posture, supporting the idea that inter- and intra-limb postures seemingly share the same control mechanism.

Background: While the importance of the upper and lower limbs in locomotion is well understood, the kinematics of the trunk during walking remains largely unexplored. Two decades ago, a casual observation was reported indicating spine lengthening in a small sample of mostly children during walking, but this observation was never replicated. Objectives: This study aims to verify the preliminary observation that spine lengthening occurs during walking and to explore changes in spine kinematics across three different age groups. Methods: A convenience sample of 45 healthy participants was divided into three groups of 15 individuals each: children (ages 5 to 13), young adults (ages 18 to 30), and older adults (ages 50 to 70). The spinal length, defined as the distance between C7 and the coccyx, and other kinematic parameters were analyzed using a motion analysis system while participants stood and walked standing and walking at their natural cadence. Results: In all groups, the length of the spine increased while walking compared to standing. This change was primarily due to a reduction in the inferior spinal angle, which is associated with lumbar lordosis, rather than a change in the superior spinal angle, which is related to thoracic kyphosis. The average change in spinal length during the walking cycle was approximately 7% in children, while it was only about 1% in adults. We also found a reduction in the range of motion for almost all the variables in adults. Conclusions: The increase in the spinal length during walking is related to a reduction in the physiological spine curve. This occurs due to muscle contractions which are needed to stabilize the locomotor system. As people age, the reduction in spinal length changes is associated with decreased spinal mobility and to a natural tendency toward anterior trunk flexion.