Understanding the kinetics, thermodynamics, and molecular mechanisms of liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) is of paramount importance in cell biology, requiring reproducible methods for studying often severely aggregation-prone proteins. Frequently applied approaches for inducing LLPS, such as dilution of the protein from an urea-containing solution or cleavage of its fused solubility tag, often lead to very different kinetic behaviors. Here we demonstrate that at carefully selected pH values proteins such as the low-complexity domain of hnRNPA2, TDP-43, and NUP98, or the stress protein ERD14, can be kept in solution and their LLPS can then be induced by a jump to native pH. This approach represents a generic method for studying the full kinetic trajectory of LLPS under near native conditions that can be easily controlled, providing a platform for the characterization of physiologically relevant phase-separation behavior of diverse proteins.

Aggregates of TAR DNA-binding protein (TDP-43) are a hallmark of several neurodegenerative disorders, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Although TDP-43 aggregates are an undisputed pathological species at the end stage of these diseases, the molecular changes underlying the initiation of aggregation are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to investigate how phase separation affects self-aggregation and aggregation seeded by pre-formed aggregates of either the low-complexity domain (LCD) or its short aggregation-promoting regions (APRs). By systematically varying the physicochemical conditions, we observed that liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) promotes spontaneous aggregation. However, we noticed less efficient seeded aggregation in phase separating conditions. By analyzing a broad range of conditions using the Hofmeister series of buffers, we confirmed that stabilizing hydrophobic interactions prevail over destabilizing electrostatic forces. RNA affected the cooperativity between LLPS and aggregation in a “reentrant” fashion, having the strongest positive effect at intermediate concentrations. Altogether, we conclude that conditions which favor LLPS enhance the subsequent aggregation of the TDP-43 LCD with complex dependence, but also negatively affect seeding kinetics.

Cellular organelles that lack a surrounding lipid bilayer, such as the nucleolus and stress granule, represent a newly recognized, general paradigm of cellular organization. The formation of such biomolecular condensates that include ‘membraneless organelles’ (MLOs) by liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) has been in the focus of a surge of recent studies. Through a combination of in vitro and in vivo approaches, thousands of potential phase‐separating proteins have been identified, and it was found that different cellular MLOs share many common components. These perplexing observations raise the question of how cells regulate the timing and specificity of LLPS, and ensure that different MLOs form and disperse at the right moment and cellular location and can preserve their identity and physical separation. This guide gives an overview of basic regulatory mechanisms, which manifest through the action of intrinsic regulatory elements, alternative splicing, post‐translational modifications, and a broad range of phase‐separating partners. We also elaborate on the cellular integration of these different mechanisms and highlight how complex regulation can orchestrate the parallel functioning of a dozen or so different MLOs in the cell.