The efficacy of continuous antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing urinary tract infection (UTI) in infants with grade III, IV, or V vesicoureteral reflux is controversial. In this investigator-initiated, randomized, open-label trial performed in 39 European centers, we randomly assigned infants 1 to 5 months of age with grade III, IV, or V vesicoureteral reflux and no previous UTIs to receive continuous antibiotic prophylaxis (prophylaxis group) or no treatment (untreated group) for 24 months. The primary outcome was the occurrence of the first UTI during the trial period. Secondary outcomes included new kidney scarring and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at 24 months. A total of 292 participants underwent randomization (146 per group). Approximately 75% of the participants were male; the median age was 3 months, and 235 participants (80.5%) had grade IV or V vesicoureteral reflux. In the intention-to-treat analysis, a first UTI occurred in 31 participants (21.2%) in the prophylaxis group and in 52 participants (35.6%) in the untreated group (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.86; P = 0.008); the number needed to treat for 2 years to prevent one UTI was 7 children (95% CI, 4 to 29). Among untreated participants, 64.4% had no UTI during the trial. The incidence of new kidney scars and the estimated GFR at 24 months did not differ substantially between the two groups. Pseudomonas species, other non-Escherichia coli organisms, and antibiotic resistance were more common in UTI isolates obtained from participants in the prophylaxis group than in isolates obtained from those in the untreated group. Serious adverse events were similar in the two groups. In infants with grade III, IV, or V vesicoureteral reflux and no previous UTIs, continuous antibiotic prophylaxis provided a small but significant benefit in preventing a first UTI despite an increased occurrence of non-E. coli organisms and antibiotic resistance. (Funded by the Italian Ministry of Health and others; PREDICT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02021006; EudraCT number, 2013-000309-21.).

Background: Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) is the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome in children. A hallmark of the disease is the rapid remission of proteinuria following a high dose of steroids. Recurrent disease or steroid dependence are common, leading to a high steroid burden and the introduction of steroid sparing therapy. Anti-CD20 antibodies have been increasingly used with excellent results in complicated INS. Nevertheless, their use can be limited by the occurrence of infusion-related reactions (IRRs). Methods: This report discusses further treatment options for children who are intolerant to RTX and presents the first report of a successful switch to obinutuzumab (OBI) for a child with difficult-to-treat steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) and RTX intolerance who was unresponsive to a desensitization protocol. Results: A 12-year-old boy with SDNS since the age of 2, was treated with steroids, cyclophosphamide and cyclosporine A (CsA). Because of the prolonged use of calcineurin inhibitors, a course of rituximab (RTX) was planned. Unfortunately, during first infusion, the boy presented with IRR. A desensitization protocol following the first unsuccessful infusion also failed. Facing the risks of long-term cyclosporine therapy, a decision was made to switch to another type of anti-CD20 antibody. Obinutuzumab infusion with a modified premedication scheme was uneventful. Conclusions: Switching therapy to obinutuzumab may be considered an option in nephrotic children who are intolerant to RTX when alternative therapies have been exhausted. The addition of montelukast to premedication and employment of desensitization protocols may decrease the risk of infusion-related reactions to anti-CD20 agents.

Background/Objectives: Primary steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) in children is an ominous diagnosis due to limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis. The younger the child, the greater the probability of a genetic etiology which is typically resistant to immunosuppressive therapy. International guidelines recommend genetic testing and a search for rare infectious causes in the youngest age group. When no identifiable etiology is found, an immunologic cause of SRNS is suspected, with few therapeutic options available, which lately have included anti-CD20 therapy for children > 7 years of age. This is the first report on the successful use of obinutuzumab in a very young child with primary SRNS. Methods: Two consecutive doses of obinutuzumab, a humanized anti-CD20 antibody (300 mg/m² BSA), were administered two weeks apart to a 24-month-old boy with severe, complicated SRNS which had been refractory to cyclosporin A and rituximab and in whom previous genetic testing and a search for multiple infectious causes had been negative. Results: Complete remission of severe nephrotic syndrome was achieved 2 months after the last infusion with, to date, sustained resolution of proteinuria and normal serum albumin levels without further use of IMS drugs and no severe adverse effects noted. Conclusions: Obinutuzumab may be a rescue option for severe, multidrug-resistant ISN, even in young children, when no other therapeutic options are available.