Ghazaleh Tabatabai

Prof. Dr. Ghazaleh Tabatabai

Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Center for Neuro-Oncology at CCC TS, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2012 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WWWolfgang Wick
Wolfgang Wick
MPMichael Platten
Michael Platten
CMChristoph Meisner
Christoph Meisner
JFJörg Felsberg
Jörg Felsberg
Ghazaleh TabatabaiGhazaleh Tabatabai
Ghazaleh Tabatabai
MWMichael Weller
Michael Weller

19 December 2018 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NHNorbert Hilf
Norbert Hilf
SKSabrina Kuttruff-Coqui
Sabrina Kuttruff-Coqui
KFKatrin Frenzel
Katrin Frenzel
VBValesca Bukur
Valesca Bukur
SSStefan Stevanović
Stefan Stevanović
WWWolfgang Wick
Wolfgang Wick

14 April 2022 in Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AOAntonio Omuro
Antonio Omuro
ABAlba A Brandes
Alba A Brandes
ACAntoine F Carpentier
Antoine F Carpentier
Ahmed IdbaihAhmed Idbaih
Ahmed Idbaih
DRDavid A Reardon
David A Reardon
MWMichael Weller
Michael Weller
Addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to radiotherapy (RT) improves overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma (GBM), but previous studies suggest that patients with tumors harboring an unmethylated MGMT promoter derive minimal benefit. The aim of this open-label, phase III CheckMate 498 study was to evaluate the efficacy of nivolumab (NIVO) + RT compared with TMZ + RT in newly diagnosed GBM with unmethylated MGMT promoter. Patients were randomized 1:1 to standard RT (60 Gy) + NIVO (240 mg every 2 weeks for eight cycles, then 480 mg every 4 weeks) or RT + TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily during RT and 150–200 mg/m2/day 5/28 days during maintenance). The primary endpoint was OS. A total of 560 patients were randomized, 280 to each arm. Median OS (mOS) was 13.4 months (95% CI, 12.6 to 14.3) with NIVO + RT and 14.9 months (95% CI, 13.3 to 16.1) with TMZ + RT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.58; P = .0037). Median progression-free survival was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 6.2) with NIVO + RT and 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.9 to 6.7) with TMZ + RT (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.65). Response rates were 7.8% (9/116) with NIVO + RT and 7.2% (8/111) with TMZ + RT; grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) rates were 21.9% and 25.1%, and any-grade serious TRAE rates were 17.3% and 7.6%, respectively. The study did not meet the primary endpoint of improved OS; TMZ + RT demonstrated a longer mOS than NIVO + RT. No new safety signals were detected with NIVO in this study. The difference between the study treatment arms is consistent with the use of TMZ + RT as the standard of care for GBM. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02617589

20 November 2019 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FBFloris P. Barthel
Floris P. Barthel
KJKevin C. Johnson
Kevin C. Johnson
FVFrederick S. Varn
Frederick S. Varn
AMAnzhela D. Moskalik
Anzhela D. Moskalik
GTGeorgette Tanner
Georgette Tanner
TCThe GLASS Consortium
The GLASS Consortium

1 February 2019 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
UHUlrich Herrlinger
Ulrich Herrlinger
TTTheophilos Dimitrios Tzaridis
Theophilos Dimitrios Tzaridis
FMFrederic Mack
Frederic Mack
JSJoachim Peter Steinbach
Joachim Peter Steinbach
USUwe Schlegel
Uwe Schlegel
MGMartin Glas
Martin Glas

16 June 2013 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EGErich Gulbins
Erich Gulbins
MPMonica Palmada
Monica Palmada
MRMartin Reichel
Martin Reichel
ALAnja Lüth
Anja Lüth
CBChristoph Böhmer
Christoph Böhmer
JKJohannes Konrhuber
Johannes Konrhuber