Synovitis–acne–pustulosis–hyperostosis–osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome is a rare disease characterized by a sterile inflammatory osteitis and/or arthritis associated with a wide range of dermatological manifestations, such as acne, palmoplantar pustulosis, and psoriasis. This review, providing up-to-date knowledge on this disease, aims at informing researchers and clinicians to help them program future studies in order to improve patients’ care. Due to the vast clinical heterogeneity that characterizes this disease, SAPHO syndrome has received various names; among these, chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis represents the most used one. The various nomenclatures in use also reflect different approaches to its management. Indeed, considering the world-wide distribution and the vast onset age (from children to late adulthood), in addition to the multiform clinical presentation, its diagnosis and treatment are often challenging for clinicians. In this review, we provide valuable insights on SAPHO syndrome, delving into its many aspects: epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and classification. Most importantly, this paper addresses the continuously changing treatment panorama of this disease, from established drugs to newly introduced ones. Furthermore, a peculiar focus regards nonpharmacologic approaches, including traditional Chinese medicine, the apheresis technique, and surgery. Similarly, this review also discusses patients’ lifestyle, including quality of life. To improve SAPHO syndrome’s management, different knowledge gaps should be filled, such as its current epidemiology and pathogenesis. In turn, perfected knowledge in these fields could also advance research in therapy.

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a group of chronic inflammatory diseases affecting the spine and peripheral joints, causing pain, stiffness, and reduced mobility. This narrative review examines how lifestyle factors—specifically smoking, alcohol consumption, and unhealthy diet—contribute to the onset and progression of SpA. It highlights their impact on disease activity, comorbidities, radiographic damage, and treatment response. Therefore, healthcare providers are encouraged to support patients in making personalized lifestyle changes. These findings underscore the importance of a comprehensive approach to SpA management, integrating lifestyle modifications with conventional therapies for optimal disease control and improved outcomes.

SAPHO syndrome is a complex disease that encompasses both inflammatory arthritis and/or osteitis and dermatologic manifestations. It is considered a rare disease, in fact, no clinical trials have been conducted on its therapy and management. Therefore, therapeutic approach is based on small case studies. Here, we described the case of a 63-year-old woman affected by SAPHO syndrome, treated with the selective IL-23p19 antagonist, Risankizumab, after unsuccessful therapies with Methotrexate, Infliximab, Adalimumab, and an allergic reaction to Secukinumab. At the beginning of therapy, in November 2022, the patient presented with arthritis in both knees associated with palmar pustulosis and guttate psoriasis on the trunk. DAPSA score was 24, PtGA 80 mm, PASI score 11.1, and BSA 40%. Thereafter, Risankizumab was started at the standard dosage of 150 mg. At week 24 patient achieved clinical remission, DAPSA score was 8, PtGA was 30 mm, PASI was 1, and BSA 2.5. Patient maintained clinical remission state at the subsequent week 52 evaluation. At the same time, the patient did not report any adverse effects. Health-related quality of life was also assessed at the same time points aforementioned, showing significant improvement. In conclusion, this case report wants to point out the efficacy and safety of Risankizumab in SAPHO syndrome, reporting a sustained disease remission through a 12 months long follow-up period. We can consider IL-23p19 targeted therapy as a novel treatment option for SAPHO—with a high efficacy potential—especially on patients that have already been treated with other biologics.

Data on the risk of adverse events (AEs) and disease flares in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) after the third dose of COVID-19 vaccine are scarce. The aim of this multicenter, prospective study is to analyze the clinical and immunological safety of BNT162b2 vaccine in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients followed-up from the first vaccine cycle to the third dose. The vaccine showed an overall good safety profile with no patient reporting serious AEs, and a low percentage of total AEs at both doses (40/78 (51.3%) and 13/47 (27.7%) patients after the second and third dose, respectively (p < 0.002). Flares were observed in 10.3% of patients after the end of the vaccination cycle and 12.8% after the third dose. Being vaccinated for influenza was inversely associated with the onset of AEs after the second dose, at both univariable (p = 0.013) and multivariable analysis (p = 0.027). This result could allow identification of a predictive factor of vaccine tolerance, if confirmed in larger patient populations. A higher disease activity at baseline was not associated with a higher incidence of AEs or disease flares. Effectiveness was excellent after the second dose, with only 1/78 (1.3%) mild breakthrough infection (BI) and worsened after the third dose, with 9/47 (19.2%) BI (p < 0.002), as a probable expression of the higher capacity of the Omicron variants to escape vaccine recognition.

Introduction The aim of this work is to characterize which Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) domains are mainly achieved, based on different treatments, in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients. Moreover, the association between MDA achievement and the different treatment groups was assessed. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of two longitudinal PsA groups. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18 years, PsA diagnosis, stable treatment for at least 6 months. Patients were grouped depending on the therapy: group 1: Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)/cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors (COX2i)/steroids, group 2: conventional synthetic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (csDMARDs), group 3: Tumor Necrosis Factor α inhibitors (TNFi), group 4: interleukin inhibitors (IL)12-23i or IL-23i, group 5: IL-17i, group 6: phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors (PD4i). For each group, the achieved domains based on therapy were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between the treatment groups and the MDA achievement. Results A total of 220 patients were enrolled, and MDA was achieved in 45.8% of them. In all treatment groups, the first MDA domains achieved were: body surface area ≤ 3, swollen joint count ≤ 1 and Leeds Enthesitis Index ≤ 1, while MDA domains less frequently achieved were Patient Global Assessment (PtgA) ≤ 2 cm and pain on visual analogue scale ≤ 1.5 cm. The logistic regression analysis showed higher odds ratios for the achievement of the MDA in those patients in groups 3 and 4. Conclusions In each treatment group, MDA domains less frequently achieved were PtGA and pain, suggesting that “patient-driven domains” are still an unmet need. Due to the study design and the low number of patients in some groups, it is not possible to clearly define which MDA domain was achieved or not based on treatment; however, it seems that some differences could be present. If larger and prospective studies confirm our preliminary results, we could move toward a personalized/domain treatment approach in PsA.

Objectives: We aimed to analyse the incidence and severity of breakthrough infections (BIs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients after a COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination booster dose. Methods: We enrolled 194 RA patients and 1002 healthcare workers (HCWs) as controls. Clinical, lifestyle and demographic factors were collected at the time of the third dose, and immunogenicity analyses were carried out in a subgroup of patients at 4–6 weeks after the third dose. Results: BIs were experienced by 42% patients (82/194) with a median time since the last vaccination of 176 days. Older age (>50 years; aHR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.20–0.74), receiving conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) (aHR 0.52, 95%CI: 0.30–0.90) and having a titre of neutralising antibodies >20 (aHR 0.36, 95% CI: 0.12–1.07) were identified as protective factors. Conversely, anti-IL6R treatment and anti-CD20 therapy increased BI probability. BIs were mostly pauci-symptomatic, but the hospitalisation incidence was significantly higher than in HCWs (8.5% vs. 0.19%); the main risk factor was anti-CD20 therapy. Conclusions: Being older than 50 years and receiving csDMARDs were shown to be protective factors for BI, whereas anti-IL6R or anti-CD20 therapy increased the risk. Higher neutralising antibody titres were associated with a lower probability of BI. If confirmed in a larger population, the identification of a protective cut-off would allow a personalised risk–benefit therapeutic management of RA patients.