The impact of the intercropping system on the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum (SPAC), encompassing soil evaporation, soil moisture dynamics, and crop transpiration, remains an area of uncertainty. Field experiments were conducted for two years in conjunction with the SIMDualKc (Simulation Dual Crop Coefficient) model to simulate two planting configurations: sole-cropped wolfberry (Lycium barbarum L.) (D) and wolfberry intercropped with alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) (J). These configurations were subjected to different irrigation levels: full irrigation (W1, 75–85% θfc), mild deficit irrigation (W2, 65–75% θfc), moderate deficit irrigation (W3, 55–65% θfc), and severe deficit irrigation (W4, 45–55% θfc). The findings revealed that the JW1 treatment reduced the annual average soil evaporation by 32% compared with that of DW1. Additionally, mild, moderate, and severe deficit irrigation reduced soil evaporation by 17, 24, and 36%, respectively, compared with full irrigation. The intercropping system exhibited a more efficient canopy structure, resulting in reduced soil evaporation and alleviation of water stress to a certain extent. In terms of temporal dynamics, monocropping resulted in soil moisture levels from 1% to 15% higher than intercropping, with the most significant differences manifesting in the mid to late stages, whereas differences in the early stages were not statistically significant. Spatially, the intercropping system exhibited 7–19% lower soil water contents (SWCs) than sole cropping, primarily within the root water uptake zone within the 0–60 cm soil layer. The intercropping system showed an enhanced water absorption capacity for plant transpiration, resulting in a 29% increase in transpiration compared with sole cropping, thereby achieving water-saving benefits. These findings contribute to our understanding of the agronomic and environmental implications of intercropping wolfberry and alfalfa in arid regions and provide insights into optimizing water and soil resource management for sustainable agricultural practices.

This study posits that strategically optimizing irrigation and fertilization regimes can enhance the productivity and water use efficiency (WUE) of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), thereby mitigating the constraints imposed by soil impoverishment and water scarcity in forage production systems of arid and semi-arid regions. Conducted over two years, the outdoor pot experiment investigated the effects of water regulation during the branching and bud stages (each at 60–100% θ_0.85, where θ_0.85 = 0.85θfc) and different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization (0–280 kg/ha each) on alfalfa yield and WUE. Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) with a Central Composite Design (CCD), we modeled the relationships between input variables and key response parameters: total yield, evapotranspiration (ET), and WUE. The response surface models exhibited high reliability, with coefficients of determination R², adjusted R², predicted R², and adequate precision exceeding 0.94, 0.90, 0.86, and 13.6, respectively. Sensitivity analysis indicated that water regulation during critical growth stages, particularly the branching stage, had the most significant impact on yield and ET, while nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization positively influenced WUE. Within the appropriate range of water management, judicious fertilization significantly enhanced alfalfa production performance, although excessive inputs resulted in diminishing returns. This study identified the optimal conditions for sustainable production: branching stage water regulation (82.26–83.12% θ_0.85) and bud stage water regulation (78.11–88.47% θ_0.85), along with nitrogen application (110.59–128.88 kg/ha) and phosphorus application (203.86–210 kg/ha). These findings provide practical guidelines for improving the sustainability and efficiency of alfalfa production in resource-limited environments.