Background In the past three years, COVID-19 has had a significant impact on the healthcare systems and people’s safety worldwide. Mass vaccinations dramatically improved the health and economic damage caused by SARS-CoV-2. However, the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in patients at high risk of allergic reactions still has many unmet needs that should be clarified. Material and methods A retrospective, single-centre study was performed by collecting demographic and clinical data of patients with Mast Cell Disorders (MCDs) to evaluate the safety and tolerability of COVID-19 vaccinations. Moreover, any changes in the natural history of the underlying disease following the vaccine have been evaluated. Results This study included 66 patients affected with MCDs. Out of them, 52 (78.8%) received a COVID-19 vaccination and 41 (78.8%) completed the vaccination course. Premedication came first in 86.6% of our patients. A total of seven (4.5%) patients complained about an immediate reaction and two (1.3%) had a late reaction. Worsening of MCD history was observed in a single patient. Conclusions Despite the overall high risk of allergic reactions, our study did not reveal any increased risk for SARS-CoV-2 allergic reactions in MCD patients, thus supporting the recommendation in favour of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. However, due to the potentially increased rate of anaphylactic reactions, MCD patients should receive vaccine premedication and should be treated in a hospital setting after an allergological specialistic evaluation.

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that exhibits considerable diversity in terms of both clinical and immunological manifestations. Since its female-to-male ratio is around 9:1, it is well recognized that systemic lupus erythematosus mostly affects women, especially those of childbearing age. There is a greater susceptibility to infections in adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) compared to the general population. However, only a small number of studies have attempted to analyze this risk using real-life data, and even fewer have successfully assessed the influence of sex. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted, enrolling patients and dividing them into two groups based on their biological sex. Infectious episodes were identified from medical records and categorized by severity. Patients were stratified according to disease duration and treatment received. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for the assessment of risk factors. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for potential confounders. Model fit was evaluated using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test, and interactions between variables were tested. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. Results: A total of 119 patients (107 females and 12 males) were included in the analysis. No significant difference in age was found between sexes (t = −0.715, p = 0.487), but disease duration was significantly shorter in males (t = 3.35, p = 0.003). Logistic regression showed a significant association between male sex and infection risk (β = 0.9426, p = 0.05), with males having an almost sixfold higher probability of infection compared to females (OR 5.675, 95% CI: 1.4479–22.2477, p = 0.0127). Disease duration (β = 0.0250, p = 0.102) and smoking status (β = 0.4529, p = 0.078) were not statistically significant. Lastly, correlation analysis revealed a significant association between SS-A antibodies and infection rate (r = 0.291, p = 0.003). Conclusions: This study highlights a significant sex-based disparity in the risk of infections among SLE patients, with males being at a higher risk compared to females. The differences in the distribution of infections, such as the higher prevalence of pneumonia in males and urinary tract infections in females, suggest that sex-specific factors, including immunological and hormonal differences, may influence infection susceptibility. Our findings emphasize the need for tailored clinical management, with increased vigilance for infections in male patients, to improve prevention strategies and targeted therapeutic interventions in this subgroup.

Background Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that exhibits considerable diversity in terms of both clinical and immunological manifestations. Since its female-to-male ratio is around 9:1, it is well recognized that systemic lupus erythematosus mostly affects women, especially of childbearing age. There is a greater susceptibility to infections in adult patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) compared to the general population. However, only a small number of studies have attempted to analyze this risk using real-life data, and even fewer have successfully assessed the influence of sex. Materials and Methods A retrospective study was conducted, enrolling patients and dividing them into two groups based on their biological sex. Infectious episodes were identified from medical records and categorized by severity. Patients were stratified according to disease duration and treatment received. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for the assessment of risk factors. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for potential confounders. Model fit was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and interactions between variables were tested. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. Results A total of 119 patients (107 females, 12 males) were included in the analysis. No significant difference in age was found between sexes (t = -0.715, p = 0.487), but disease duration was significantly shorter in males (t = 3.35, p = 0.003). Logistic regression showed a significant association between male sex and infection risk (β = 0.9426, p = 0.05), with males having an almost sixfold higher probability of infection compared to females (OR 5.675, 95% CI: 1.4479–22.2477, p = 0.0127). Disease duration (β = 0.0250, p = 0.102) and smoking status (β = 0.4529, p = 0.078) were not statistically significant. Lastly, correlation analysis revealed a significant association between SS-A antibodies and infection rate (r = 0.291, p = 0.003). Conclusions This study highlights a significant sex-based disparity in the risk of infections among SLE patients, with males being at a higher risk compared to females. The differences in the distribution of infections, such as the higher prevalence of pneumonia in males and urinary tract infections in females, suggest that sex-specific factors, including immunological and hormonal differences, may influence infection susceptibility. Our findings emphasize the need for tailored clinical management, with increased vigilance for infections in male patients, to improve prevention strategies and targeted therapeutic interventions in this subgroup.

Background Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterized by a variety of both signs and symptoms; it mainly affects women of childbearing age, with an estimated prevalence of 24/100,000 people in Europe and North America. SLE is often described as an antibodies-driven disease as its clinical manifestations are usually associated with the presence or the absence of specific antibodies. Objectives To evaluate clinical manifestations in patients with SLE and to assess the relationship with the presence of specific antibodies by using real-world data. Methods A retrospective study was performed; the 2019 EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus were used to classify patients with SLE. Data concerning serological profiles (which included Antinuclear antibodies – ANA, anti dsDNA, anti-Ro/SS-A, anti-La/SS-B, anti-Sm) were gathered along with medical records of clinical manifestations. Complement levels were also tested for possible clinical correlations. χ² or Fisher's exact tests were utilized to establish associations between autoantibodies and symptoms. The odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed. No correction was made for multiple testing; only a p-value 0.01 ≤ was considered significant. Results One-hundred and twenty-seven patients (n=127, mean age 53.43 ±14.02) were enrolled in this study. Anti-dsDNA antibodies were found to be statistically significant for both malar rash and proteinuria; anti-Ro/SSA antibodies showed an association with photosensitivity and pericarditis; furthermore, a strong association was found between anti-Ro antibodies and proteinuria, but only if anti-dsDNA antibodies were present as well. Patients who tested positive for anti-La/SSB antibodies correlated with a threefold increase in the risk of developing pericarditis. Lastly, anti-Smith appeared to be associated with NPSLE as well as an increased risk for both autoimmune haemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia. Conclusions In our study, many associations confirmed those found in previous studies; however, new relationships between antibodies and clinical manifestations were found thus indicating the need for additional evaluations to assess these correlations further.