Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is often painful and can arise during or after the end of oncological treatments. They are mostly induced by platinum salts, taxanes, and immunotherapies. Their incidence is estimated between 19 and 85%. They can require a chemotherapy dose reduction or early termination. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) recommends high-concentration capsaicin patch (HCCP) in second line for the treatment of painful CIPN. This treatment induces a significative pain relief but only shown by low-powered studies. The objective of this study was to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of HCCP applications in CIPN. Methods: This monocentric observational retrospective real-world-data study of the CERCAN cohort took place in the Western Cancer Institute’s Anaesthesiology and Pain Department at Angers, France. Independent pain physicians completed the CGIC (Clinician Global Impression of Change) for each patient who benefited from HCCP applications for painful CIPN starting from 1 January 2014 to 22 December 2021, based on the collected data after every patch application. Results: A total of 57 patients (80.7% women) was treated with HCCP for painful CIPN, and 184 applications were realized, consisting of 296 sessions. CGIC found an important or complete pain relief for 61 applications (33.2%, corresponding to 43.9% patients). We found less efficacy for platinum-salts-induced CIPN compared to others (p = 0.0238). The efficacy was significatively higher for repeated applications when HCCP was used in second line compared to third line (p = 0.018). The efficacy of HCCP was significatively higher starting the third application (p = 0.0334). HCCPs were mainly responsible for local adverse events found in 66.6% patients (65.1% burning or painful sensation, 21.1% erythema). Conclusion: HCCP applications in painful CIPN induce an important pain relief with a global satisfying tolerability.

Background/Objectives: CAPTRANE evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of high-concentration capsaicin patch (HCCP) vs. oral pregabalin for the treatment of postsurgical neuropathic pain (PSNP) following breast cancer surgery. The study was designed with the aim of demonstrating noninferiority of one HCCP against daily pregabalin. Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, parallel-arm, open-label study conducted across nine centers in France. The primary endpoint was a change from baseline in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score after 2 months. Results: Recruitment challenges resulted in the randomization of 140 patients (versus 644 planned); the per-protocol population comprised 107 patients (HCCP: n = 65; pregabalin: n = 42). Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. In the per-protocol analysis, the mean (standard deviation) change versus baseline in NPRS score was −1.926 (2.554) with HCCP and −1.634 (2.498) with pregabalin. The prespecified analysis showed that HCCP was not inferior to pregabalin: the lower bound of the 90% confidence interval for the between-arm difference was −0.889 and the upper bound was +0.260 (i.e., below the predefined clinical threshold of +0.4). Patient-reported outcomes showed no statistically significant differences between treatments. The painful area size decreased significantly more with HCCP. Tolerability profiles differed, with HCCP mostly causing application-site reactions. While >50% of patients switched from pregabalin to HCCP, none switched from HCCP to pregabalin. Conclusions: This comparative study in PSNP post breast cancer surgery, evaluating a single treatment of HCCP, shows a noninferior reduction in pain intensity, a superior reduction in painful area size, and a patient preference for HCCP compared with pregabalin. Despite limitations, it contributes valuable initial data for PSNP management in breast cancer care.

Background: The CAPTRANE trial evaluated the efficacy of randomly assigned high-concentration capsaicin patch (HCCP) versus daily oral pregabalin (PGB) in adults with chronic neuropathic pain (DN4 ≥ 4) post-breast cancer surgery. The objective of its 4-month open-label extension following patient’s self-selection of their second treatment (HCCP, PGB, or none) was to explore efficacy and safety of various strategies. Methods: The study was conducted in France between March 2019 and November 2022. At each clinic visit, we assessed pain intensity (NRS, 0–10), painful area (cm²), mood (HADS), and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Standard statistical tests were used. Results: Data from 116 patients (all females; 76% aged < 65 years) were collected. At Month 2, 71% (46/65) of HCCP-treated patients received a second HCCP application and none switched to PGB, whereas 27% (14/51) continued on PGB and 49% (25/51) of PGB-treated patients switched to HCCP. At Month 6, NRS scores had decreased in HCCP-treated patients, including PGB/HCCP-treated patients, with a reduction of −2.0 [−4.0; 0.0] and −3.0 [−4.0; −2.0] in the HCCP/HCCP and PGB/HCCP group, respectively (median[interquartile]). Adverse events aligned with those expected with HCCP and PGB; none were serious. Conclusions: This first study to examine switching between PGB and HCCP treatments for chronic intercostobrachial neuropathic pain after breast cancer surgery showed patients’ preference for HCCP, confirmed the benefit of repeated HCCP applications, and indicated that HCCP could be preceded by PGB without compromising efficacy or safety. These findings suggest that HCCP may be used early in this population, and PGB initiated before HCCP to relieve patients waiting for HCCP application.

L’analgésie intrathécale figure parmi les techniques interventionnelles de gestion de la douleur auxquelles il faut savoir penser précocement, elle est d’ailleurs largement recommandée. Ce mode d’infusion des analgésiques dans le liquide céphalorachidien permet une épargne en opioïdes et une meilleure efficacité antalgique. Malgré tout, son usage reste limité. Cet article est conçu pour rendre plus accessible l’utilisation de cette technique en déroulant le film de l’analgésie intrathécale. Le parcours du patient est détaillé en commençant par les freins, les indications, le rôle du pharmacien et de l’équipe technique, mais également les potentiels échecs.