We systematically reviewed the literature published during the last 20 years on the treatment of primary proximal hypospadias associated with severe ventral curvature. We reviewed studies published between 1990 and December 2009, searching for "hypospadias" in MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. The search yielded 69 pertinent studies. These studies were generally of low quality (69.5% surgical series). Based on the literature, curvature should be addressed stepwise starting with ventral dissection that extends underneath the urethral plate (urethral plate mobilization). Contrary to former practice, urethral plate division seems to have more of a role if significant curvature persists. Dorsal plication seems sufficient to correct only minor degrees of curvature, while a minority of cases require ventral lengthening. No urethroplasty techniques appear to be definitively superior. After urethral plate division a staged urethroplasty has lower complication rates but a second operation is required, which might otherwise be avoided in approximately 70% of cases. The present systematic review shows the weak evidence backing current management of primary severe hypospadias. We even lack a clear-cut definition of severe hypospadias and associated curvature. Hence, while we developed general recommendations for treatment based on our review of available evidence, we emphasize the need to establish shared criteria for accurate preoperative or introperative patient stratification, and to define objective outcome measures and followup intervals for data reporting to make comparison of surgical approaches reliable.

This study aims to compare the results of laparoscopic and open appendectomy (LA and OA, respectively) in a pediatric population with particular attention to complications analysis. A literature search was performed using Medline, Cochrane, Embase, Sci Search, Lilacs, and PubMed databases on all studies published during the 14-year interval of 1997-2010. Comparative studies of LA versus OA in the pediatric population were included in these studies. Data concerning operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, postoperative pain, and surgical trauma were recorded. We recorded 52 studies, but 26 of these were excluded from our analysis because they were neither relevant nor related to the adolescent population. The 26 studies analyzed showed a population of 123,628 children and adolescents (ages 0-18 years) who underwent appendectomy by laparoscopic (LA, 42,213 [34.1%]) and open (OA, 81,415 [65.9%]) techniques. Our analysis showed that patients undergoing LA presented a lower incidence of surgical wound infection, lower incidence of postoperative ileus, a lower use of analgesics in the postoperative period, an earlier resumption of normal diet, a shorter hospitalization, and a more rapid recovery to resume normal activities compared with patients undergoing OA. This study, comparing LA versus OA in children, failed to identify any major difference between the two techniques in terms of formation of intra-abdominal abscesses. As for operative time, our analysis showed globally a significant reduced operative time in OA versus LA in complicated appendicitis, but in simple appendicitis the operative time seems to be the same. Our analysis of the literature showed that the LA technique presents several advantages compared with the OA technique. For this reason, if a child is hospitalized today for appendicitis treatment in a pediatric center where the laparoscopic approach is unavailable, he or she should be placed on antibiotics and transferred to a center that offers the laparoscopic approach.