Delphine Javelaud

Dr. Delphine Javelaud


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2004 in Journal of Dermatological Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMeinhard Schiller
Meinhard Schiller
DJDelphine Javelaud
Delphine Javelaud
AMAlain Mauviel
Alain Mauviel

29 August 2005 in Oncogene
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DJDelphine Javelaud
Delphine Javelaud
AMAlain Mauviel
Alain Mauviel
Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily members signal via membrane-bound heteromeric serine–threonine kinase receptor complexes. Upon ligand-binding, receptor activation leads to phosphorylation of cytoplasmic protein substrates of the Smad family. Following phosphorylation and oligomerization, the latter move into the nucleus to act as transcription factors to regulate target gene expression. TGF-β responses are not solely the result of the activation Smad cascade, but are highly cell-type specific and dependent upon interactions of Smad signaling with a variety of other intracellular signaling mechanisms, initiated or not by TGF-β itself, that may either potentiate, synergize, or antagonize, the rather linear TGF-β/Smad pathway. These include, (a), regulation of Smad activity by mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), (b), nuclear interaction of activated Smads with transcriptional cofactors, whether coactivators or corepressors, that may be themselves be regulated by diverse signaling mechanisms, and (c), negative feedback loops exerted by inhibitory Smads, transcriptional targets of the Smad cascade. This review focuses on how MAPKs modulate the outcome of Smad activation by TGF-β, and how cross-signaling mechanisms between the Smad and MAPK pathways may take place and affect cell fate in the context of carcinogenesis.

1 January 2011 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KMKhalid S. Mohammad
Khalid S. Mohammad
DJDelphine Javelaud
Delphine Javelaud
Pierrick FournierPierrick Fournier
Pierrick Fournier
MNMaria Niewolna
Maria Niewolna
CMC. Ryan McKenna
C. Ryan McKenna
TGTheresa A. Guise
Theresa A. Guise
Melanoma often metastasizes to bone where it is exposed to high concentrations of TGF-β. Constitutive Smad signaling occurs in human melanoma. Because TGF-β promotes metastases to bone by several types of solid tumors including breast cancer, we hypothesized that pharmacologic blockade of the TGF-β signaling pathway may interfere with the capacity of melanoma cells to metastasize to bone. In this study, we tested the effect of a small molecule inhibitor of TGF-β receptor I kinase (TβRI), SD-208, on various parameters affecting the development and progression of melanoma, both in vitro and in a mouse model of human melanoma bone metastasis. In melanoma cell lines, SD-208 blocked TGF-β induction of Smad3 phosphorylation, Smad3/4-specific transcription, Matrigel invasion and expression of the TGF-β target genes PTHrP, IL-11, CTGF, and RUNX2. To assess effects of SD-208 on melanoma development and metastasis, nude mice were inoculated with 1205Lu melanoma cells into the left cardiac ventricle and drug was administered by oral gavage on prevention or treatment protocols. SD-208 (60 mg/kg/d), started 2days before tumor inoculation prevented the development of osteolytic bone metastases compared with vehicle. In mice with established bone metastases, the size of osteolytic lesions was significantly reduced after 4weeks treatment with SD-208 compared with vehicle-treated mice. Our results demonstrate that therapeutic targeting of TGF-β may prevent the development of melanoma bone metastases and decrease the progression of established osteolytic lesions. Cancer Res; 71(1); 175–84. ©2010 AACR.

15 February 2012 in Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DWDaniel S. Widmer
Daniel S. Widmer
PCPhil Cheng
Phil Cheng
OEOssia M. Eichhoff
Ossia M. Eichhoff
BBBenedetta C. Belloni
Benedetta C. Belloni
MZMarie C. Zipser
Marie C. Zipser
KHKeith S. Hoek
Keith S. Hoek
Summary: There is growing evidence that the metastatic spread of melanoma is driven not by a linear increase in tumorigenic aggressiveness, but rather by switching back and forth between two different phenotypes of metastatic potential. In vitro these phenotypes are respectively defined by the characteristics of strong proliferation/weak invasiveness and weak proliferation/strong invasiveness. Melanoma cell phenotype is tightly linked to gene expression. Taking advantage of this, we have developed a gene expression–based tool for predicting phenotype called Heuristic Online Phenotype Prediction. We demonstrate the predictive utility of this tool by comparing phenotype‐specific signatures with measurements of characteristics of melanoma phenotype‐specific biology in different melanoma cell lines and short‐term cultures. We further show that 86% of 536 tested melanoma lines and short‐term cultures are significantly associated with the phenotypes we describe. These findings reinforce the concept that a two‐state system, as described by the phenotype switching model, underlies melanoma progression.

4 August 2010 in JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VAVasileia-Ismini Alexaki
Vasileia-Ismini Alexaki
DJDelphine Javelaud
Delphine Javelaud
LKLéon van Kempen
Léon van Kempen
KMKhalid S. Mohammad
Khalid S. Mohammad
SDSylviane Dennler
Sylviane Dennler
AMAlain Mauviel
Alain Mauviel
The transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) pathway, which has both tumor suppressor and pro-oncogenic activities, is often constitutively active in melanoma and is a marker of poor prognosis. Recently, we identified GLI2, a mediator of the hedgehog pathway, as a transcriptional target of TGF-β signaling. We used real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and western blotting to determine GLI2 expression in human melanoma cell lines and subsequently classified them as GLI2high or as GLI2low according to their relative GLI2 mRNA and protein expression levels. GLI2 expression was reduced in a GLI2high cell line with lentiviral expression of short hairpin RNA targeting GLI2. We assessed the role of GLI2 in melanoma cell invasiveness in Matrigel assays. We measured secretion of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and MMP-9 by gelatin zymography and expression of E-cadherin by western blotting and RT-PCR. The role of GLI2 in development of bone metastases was determined following intracardiac injection of melanoma cells in immunocompromised mice (n = 5–13). Human melanoma samples (n = 79) at various stages of disease progression were analyzed for GLI2 and E-cadherin expression by immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, or RT-PCR. All statistical tests were two-sided. Among melanoma cell lines, increased GLI2 expression was associated with loss of E-cadherin expression and with increased capacity to invade Matrigel and to form bone metastases in mice (mean osteolytic tumor area: GLI2high vs GLI2low, 2.81 vs 0.93 mm 2 , difference = 1.88 mm 2 , 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16 to 2.60, P < .001). Reduction of GLI2 expression in melanoma cells that had expressed high levels of GLI2 substantially inhibited both basal and TGF-β-induced cell migration, invasion (mean number of Matrigel invading cells: shGLI2 vs shCtrl (control), 52.6 vs 100, difference = 47.4, 95% CI = 37.0 to 57.8, P = .024; for shGLI2 + TGF-β vs shCtrl + TGF-β, 31.0 vs 161.9, difference = −130.9, 95% CI = −96.2 to −165.5, P = .002), and MMP secretion in vitro and the development of experimental bone metastases in mice. Within human melanoma lesions, GLI2 expression was heterogeneous, associated with tumor regions in which E-cadherin was lost and increased in the most aggressive tumors. GLI2 was directly involved in driving melanoma invasion and metastasis in this preclinical study.

1 March 2007 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DJDelphine Javelaud
Delphine Javelaud
KMKhalid S. Mohammad
Khalid S. Mohammad
CMChristopher R. McKenna
Christopher R. McKenna
Pierrick FournierPierrick Fournier
Pierrick Fournier
FLFlavie Luciani
Flavie Luciani
AMAlain Mauviel
Alain Mauviel
Melanoma has a propensity to metastasize to bone, where it is exposed to high concentrations of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β). Because TGF-β promotes bone metastases from other solid tumors, such as breast cancer, we tested the role of TGF-β in melanoma metastases to bone. 1205Lu melanoma cells, stably transfected to overexpress the natural TGF-β/Smad signaling inhibitor Smad7, were studied in an experimental model of bone metastasis whereby tumor cells are inoculated into the left cardiac ventricle of nude mice. All mice bearing parental and mock-transfected 1205Lu cells developed osteolytic bone metastases 5 weeks post-tumor inoculation. Mice bearing 1205Lu-Smad7 tumors had significantly less osteolysis on radiographs and longer survival compared with parental and mock-transfected 1205Lu mice. To determine if the reduced bone metastases observed in mice bearing 1205Lu-Smad7 clones was due to reduced expression of TGF-β target genes known to enhance metastases to bone from breast cancer cells, we analyzed gene expression of osteolytic factors, parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) and interleukin-11 (IL-11), the chemotactic receptor CXCR4, and osteopontin in 1205Lu cells. Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis indicated that PTHrP, IL-11, CXCR4, and osteopontin mRNA steady-state levels were robustly increased in response to TGF-β and that Smad7 and the TβRI small-molecule inhibitor, SB431542, prevented such induction. In addition, 1205Lu-Smad7 bone metastases expressed significantly lower levels of IL-11, connective tissue growth factor, and PTHrP. These data suggest that TGF-β promotes osteolytic bone metastases due to melanoma by stimulating the expression of prometastatic factors via the Smad pathway. Blockade of TGF-β signaling may be an effective treatment for melanoma metastasis to bone. [Cancer Res 2007;67(5):2317–24]