BACKGROUND:. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has remarkably evolved with successful results. Although PELD has gained popularity for th

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) and open lumbar microdiscectomy (OLM) for recurrent disc herniation. Fifty-four patients, who underwent surgery, either PELD (25 patients) or repeated OLM (29 patients), due to recurrent disc herniation at L4-5 level, were divided into two groups according to the surgical methods. Excluded were patients with sequestrated disc, calcified disc, severe neurological deficit, or instability. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiological variables were assessed using plain radiography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. Mean operating time and hospital stay were significantly shorter in PELD group (45.8 minutes and 0.9 day, respectively) than OLM group (73.8 minutes and 3.8 days, respectively) (p < 0.001). Complications occurred in 4% in PELD group and 10.3% in OLM group in the perioperative period. At a mean follow-up duration of 34.2 months, the mean improvements of back pain, leg pain, and functional improvement were 4.0, 5.5, and 40.9% for PELD group and 2.3, 5.1, and 45.0% for OLM group, respectively. Second recurrence occurred in 4% after PELD and 10.3% after OLM. Disc height did not change after PELD, but significantly decreased after OLM (p = 0.0001). Neither sagittal rotation angle nor volume of multifidus muscle changed significantly in both groups. Both PELD and repeated OLM showed favorable outcomes for recurrent disc herniation, but PELD had advantages in terms of shorter operating time, hospital stay, and disc height preservation.

Study Design. A retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent microdecompression for far lateral disc or foraminal stenosis. Objectives. To evaluate the risk factors for unsatisfactory outcome. Summary of Background Data. There has been no detailed analysis of postoperative radicular pain, although it is not infrequent following foraminal and far lateral microdecompression. Methods. A total of 184 patients, who were followed up for more than 2 years, were reviewed. Microdecompression was performed through lateral intermuscular approach. In cases of double herniation (combination of intracanalicular disc at the same level), additional intracanalicular decompression was simultaneously performed. The unsatisfactory outcomes included persistent or recurrent leg pain, based on the Japanese Orthopedic Association leg pain score, and revision surgery at the same level. The potential risk factors, including gender, age, symptom period, preoperative radiologic and intraoperative findings, were determined. Results. The average follow-up period was 38.4 months, with a maximum 70 months. Forty of the 184 patients (21.7%) had persistent or recurrent leg pain, with nine requiring revision surgeries. The statistically significant risk factor for unfavorable outcomes was double herniation, with odds ratio of 2.89 (P = 0.004). Conclusion. Facet preserving microdecompression is an effective method for foraminal and far lateral root compression. However, in cases of double herniation, total facetectomy is preferable.