PURPOSE: On the basis of National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, clinical stage (CS) II seminoma is treated with radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) demonstrated recent success as first-line therapy for RP-only disease. Our aim was to confirm surgical efficacy and evaluate recurrences after primary RPLND for CS IIA/IIB seminoma to determine if various clinical factors could predict recurrences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent primary RPLND for seminoma from 2014 to 2021 were identified. All patients had at least 6 months of follow-up. Nineteen patients were part of a clinical trial. Patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were excluded from Kaplan-Meier recurrence-free survival (RFS) analysis. RESULTS: We identified 67 patients who underwent RPLND for RP-only seminoma. One patient had pN0 disease. Median follow-up time after RPLND was 22.4 months (interquartile range, 12.3-36.1 months) and 11 patients were found to have a recurrence. The 2-year RFS for RPLND-only patients without adjuvant chemotherapy was 80.2%. Patients who developed RP disease for a period > 12 months had the lowest chance of recurrence, with a 2-year RFS of 92.2%. Seven initial CS II patients were on surveillance for 3-12 months before surgery and no patients experienced recurrence. Pathologic nodal stage and high-risk factors such as tumor size > 4 cm or rete testis invasion of the orchiectomy specimen did not affect recurrence. CONCLUSION: CS II seminoma can be treated with surgery to avoid rigors of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Patients with delayed development of CS II disease (> 12 months) had the best surgical results. Patients may present with borderline CS II disease, and careful surveillance may avoid overtreatment. Further study on patient selection and extent of dissection remains uncertain and warrants further investigation.

PURPOSE: According to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) has been advocated after primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) to reduce the risk of relapse in pathologic nodal (pN) stage pN2 or pN3, whereas surveillance is preferred for pN1. We sought to explore the oncologic efficacy of primary RPLND alone for pathologic stage II in nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs) to reduce overtreatment with chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with pathologic stage II NSGCT after primary RPLND between 2007 and 2017 were identified. Patients were excluded for elevated preoperative serum tumor markers, receipt of AC, or if pure teratoma or primitive neuroectodermal tumor elements were found in the retroperitoneal pathology. RESULTS: We identified 117 patients with active NSGCT in the retroperitoneum after primary RPLND. We excluded seven patients who lacked meaningful follow-up and 13 patients who received AC. There were 97 patients treated with RPLND alone: 41 pN1, 46 pN2, and 10 pN3. In total, 77 of 97 patients had not recurred after a median follow-up time of 52 months. The 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 80.3%, and the 5-year RFS was 79%. No differences in RFS were noted among nodal stage—pN1, pN2, and pN3—on Kaplan-Meier analysis. Lymphovascular invasion in the orchiectomy specimen, a high-risk pathologic feature, was also predictive of recurrence after primary RPLND. All 20 patients who recurred were treated with first-line chemotherapy and remained continuously disease free. CONCLUSION: Most men with pathologic stage II disease treated with surgery alone in our series never experienced a recurrence. We did not observe a difference in recurrences between patients with pN1 and pN2. The recommendation for AC for pN2 disease may be overtreatment in most patients.

Objective The objective is to compare robotic sacral colpopexy (RSC) utilizing autologous fascia lata to RSC with synthetic mesh in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Methods We performed a prospective non-randomized case comparison trial at a single institution. We compared RSC utilizing either synthetic mesh or autologous fascia lata in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse, stages II through IV. The primary outcome was anatomic prolapse recurrence determined by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) exam. Secondary outcomes included patient reported outcomes such as the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 (IIQ-7). Complications were also recorded and categorized using the Clavien-Dindo system (CD). The hypothesis is that autologous fascia lata would provide equivalent anatomic and patient reported outcomes compared to mesh while eliminating mesh related complications. Results Sixty-four women underwent RSC with 19 (29.7%) receiving fascia lata graft. The overall operative time was greater in the fascia lata group with mean fascia lata harvest time of 24.8±7.4 minutes. Intragroup comparisons of the fascia and mesh groups demonstrated significant improvement in pelvic measurements as well as patient reported outcomes. Intergroup comparison demonstrated equivalent success rates at 12.1±8.7 months follow up. There was one apical failure in the fascia lata RSC group, however the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.30). Significant complications in the fascia lata harvest group included two CD-II and one CD-IIIb. In the mesh group there was one mesh erosion requiring surgical excision (CD-IIIb). Conclusion This is the first comparison between RSC with autologous fascia lata vs. mesh. Short-term anatomic outcomes were similar with autologous fascia lata use without the risk of mesh erosion. Morbidity from graft harvest site was not trivial. These results emphasize the need for a randomized controlled trial.

The introduction of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinases (VEGFR-TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (IOs) have drastically altered the treatment landscape for kidney cancer, with doublet combination immunotherapy (IO/IO or IO/VEGFR-TKI) now set as the standard front-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the roles of VEGFR-TKIs and IOs in the neoadjuvant setting for locoregional/locally advanced RCC remain undefined, where the goals may be primary tumor downsizing/downstaging and potentially eradicating micrometastatic disease. This review will examine VEGFR-TKI monotherapy, IO monotherapy, and VEGFR-TKI/IO combination regimens in a preoperative setting with a focus on the efficacy, toxicity, surgical, and long-term implications.