Tiffany Marie Juarez

Dr. Tiffany Marie Juarez

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 June 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJames Park
James Park
Adrian Lopez Garcia de LomanaAdrian Lopez Garcia de Lomana
Adrian Lopez Garcia de Lomana
DMDiego M. Marzese
Diego M. Marzese
TJTiffany Marie Juarez
Tiffany Marie Juarez
AFAbdullah H Feroze
Abdullah H Feroze
NBNitin S. Baliga
Nitin S. Baliga
Brain tumors are among the most lethal tumors. Glioblastoma, the most frequent primary brain tumor in adults, has a median survival time of approximately 15 months after diagnosis or a five-year survival rate of 10%; the recurrence rate is nearly 90%. Unfortunately, this prognosis has not improved for several decades. The lack of progress in the treatment of brain tumors has been attributed to their high rate of primary therapy resistance. Challenges such as pronounced inter-patient variability, intratumoral heterogeneity, and drug delivery across the blood–brain barrier hinder progress. A comprehensive, multiscale understanding of the disease, from the molecular to the whole tumor level, is needed to address the intratumor heterogeneity resulting from the coexistence of a diversity of neoplastic and non-neoplastic cell types in the tumor tissue. By contrast, inter-patient variability must be addressed by subtyping brain tumors to stratify patients and identify the best-matched drug(s) and therapies for a particular patient or cohort of patients. Accomplishing these diverse tasks will require a new framework, one involving a systems perspective in assessing the immense complexity of brain tumors. This would in turn entail a shift in how clinical medicine interfaces with the rapidly advancing high-throughput (HTP) technologies that have enabled the omics-scale profiling of molecular features of brain tumors from the single-cell to the tissue level. However, several gaps must be closed before such a framework can fulfill the promise of precision and personalized medicine for brain tumors. Ultimately, the goal is to integrate seamlessly multiscale systems analyses of patient tumors and clinical medicine. Accomplishing this goal would facilitate the rational design of therapeutic strategies matched to the characteristics of patients and their tumors. Here, we discuss some of the technologies, methodologies, and computational tools that will facilitate the realization of this vision to practice.

16 December 2025 in JCO Oncology Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CWChase J Wehre
Chase J Wehre
KBKevin Burns
Kevin Burns
TMTarub Mabud
Tarub Mabud
AAAhmed Sayed Ahmed
Ahmed Sayed Ahmed
MAMohamed Alassas
Mohamed Alassas
CKCH David Kwon
CH David Kwon
PURPOSE: Histotripsy is a noninvasive, nonionizing, nonthermal method of treating liver tumors receiving US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance in October 2023. This study aims to describe histotripsy as a method of achieving local tumor control (LTC) for primary and secondary liver tumors. METHODS: All patients receiving histotripsy since FDA clearance (December 2023-December 2024) at four institutions (two academic; two private) with >30 days of active follow-up were included. Patients were classified into palliative intent and complete treatment intent. LTC was assessed using contrast-enhanced imaging on the basis of modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) and standardized ablation criteria at postoperative days (POD) 30 and 90. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients received intended complete treatment to 91 liver tumors. Three total complications were observed: two cases of skin irritation treated with topical ointment and one case of bacteremia. At 30 days, 95% (n = 86/91) of treated liver tumors were nonviable. Two patients (one each with hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatic adenoma) received repeat treatment between POD30 and POD90, both converted to complete response. Forty-four patients and 85 tumors achieved 90-day follow-up. Three patients demonstrated persistently viable disease at POD90, all who had demonstrated viable tumor at POD30. Thus, the calculated primary efficacy rate at POD90 was 94% (n = 80/85), and the secondary efficacy rate was 96% (n = 82/85). The two patients with viable disease had neuroendocrine (n = 1), breast, and colorectal metastases (n = 1). Control rates were similar between primary and secondary tumors on time-to-event analysis (log-rank P = .146). CONCLUSION: Histotripsy achieved high rates of LTC at 30 and 90 days in this preliminary multicenter cohort. Longer-term follow-up is needed to confirm stable results.

4 December 2023 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SKSantosh Kesari
Santosh Kesari
NWNaveed Wagle
Naveed Wagle
JCJose A. Carrillo
Jose A. Carrillo
ASAkanksha Sharma
Akanksha Sharma
MNMinhdan Nguyen
Minhdan Nguyen
TJTiffany Marie Juarez
Tiffany Marie Juarez
Purpose: Chordomas are ultrarare tumors of the axial spine and skull-base without approved systemic therapy. Most chordomas have negative expression of thymidylate synthase (TS), suggesting a potential for responding to the antifolate agent pemetrexed, which inhibits TS and other enzymes involved in nucleotide biosynthesis. We evaluated the therapeutic activity and safety of high-dose pemetrexed in progressive chordoma. Patients and Methods: Adult patients with previously treated, progressive chordoma participated in an open-label, single-institution, single-arm, pilot clinical trial of intravenous pemetrexed 900 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and supportive medications of folic acid, vitamin B12, and dexamethasone. The primary endpoint was objective response rate according to RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS), tumor molecular profiles, and alterations in tissue and blood-based biomarkers. Results: Fifteen patients were enrolled and the median number of doses administered was 15 (range, 4–31). One patient discontinued treatment due to psychosocial issues after four cycles and one contracted COVID-19 after 13 cycles. Of the 14 response-evaluable patients, 2 (14%) achieved a partial response and 10 (71%) demonstrated stable disease. Median PFS was 10.5 months (95% confidence interval: 9 months–undetermined) and 6-month PFS was 67%. Adverse events were expected and relatively mild, with one grade 3 creatinine increased, and one each of grade 3 and 4 lymphopenia. No grade 5 adverse events, unexpected toxicities, or dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Several patients reported clinical improvement in disease-related symptoms. Conclusions: High-dose pemetrexed appears tolerable and shows objective antitumor activity in patients with chordoma. Phase II studies of high-dose pemetrexed are warranted.

8 January 2025 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RKRafi Kabarriti
Rafi Kabarriti
SLShane Lloyd
Shane Lloyd
JJJames Jabalee
James Jabalee
CFCatherine Del Vecchio Fitz
Catherine Del Vecchio Fitz
RTRanda Tao
Randa Tao
SLStanley Liauw
Stanley Liauw
Background: The incidence and mortality of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) are rising, with greater than 80% of cases linked to human papillomavirus (HPV), primarily HPV16. Post-treatment surveillance can be challenging due to the limitations of anoscopy, digital anal rectal exam (DARE), and imaging. Plasma tumor tissue modified viral (TTMV)-HPV DNA has shown strong sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value in detecting the recurrence of HPV-driven oropharyngeal cancer. Here, we investigate the ability of TTMV-HPV DNA for the early recurrence detection of ASCC. Methods: This retrospective clinical case series included 117 patients with HPV-driven ASCC across 7 U.S. centers, monitored with TTMV-HPV DNA during routine clinical care between March 2020 and June 2024. Physician-reported clinical data and biomarker testing data were combined to create a comprehensive, longitudinal dataset for evaluating test performance metrics. Results: Patients had a median age of 63 years and median post-diagnosis follow-up of 19 months. HPV status was primarily confirmed by TTMV-HPV DNA (52%) or p16 immunohistochemistry (39%). Of those tested for TTMV-HPV DNA pretreatment, 85% had a positive result. TTMV-HPV DNA clearance during or within three months post-treatment was associated with significantly better recurrence-free survival. The per-patient surveillance sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 82.8%, 98.4%, 96.0%, and 92.5%. Of 24 patients with a documented recurrence and a positive TTMV-HPV DNA test, the test was the first evidence of recurrence in 14 patients (58.3%), with a median lead time of 59 days (range: 10–536). TTMV-HPV DNA accurately resolved 94.3% of cases with indeterminate clinical findings. Conclusions: TTMV-HPV DNA testing provides a sensitive and specific approach for detecting patients with recurrent ASCC and resolving the status of patients with indeterminate clinical findings.

1 January 2021 in Neuro-Oncology Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TJTiffany Marie Juarez
Tiffany Marie Juarez
DPDavid Piccioni
David Piccioni
LRLara Rose
Lara Rose
ANAngel Nguyen
Angel Nguyen
BBBradley Brown
Bradley Brown
SKSantosh Kesari
Santosh Kesari
Dexanabinol is a synthetic analogue of tetrahydrocannabinol identified as a potential anti-cancer therapeutic by e-Therapeutics PLC. Dexanabinol was selected for further investigation based on its preclinical tumoricidal activity. This phase I dose-escalation trial examined the safety, drug penetration into the central nervous system (CNS), preliminary antitumor activity, and recommended phase II dose. Dexanabinol formulated in cremophor/ethanol was administered once weekly via 3-hour intravenous infusion to patients with brain cancer. A total of 26 patients were dosed once weekly at 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, and 36 mg/kg. Two patients at 36 mg/kg were nonevaluable for dose level confirmation, having withdrawn early for reasons unrelated to study treatment. A recommended phase II dose of dexanabinol was established at 28 mg/kg due to related, reversible adverse events at higher dose levels that required medications for symptomatic relief. The most common drug-related toxicities were the depressed level of consciousness and lightheadedness, diarrhea, itching, fatigue, chest discomfort, and tingling in the mouth. Systemic exposure to dexanabinol (AUC0-t and Cmax) increased from 2 to 36 mg/kg, with dose nonproportionality apparent at the highest dose; dexanabinol was present in appreciable levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which implies the possibility of exposure of intracranial tumors to drug. Five of 24 efficacy-evaluable patients (21%) experienced stable disease with a median duration of 2 cycles (28-day cycle) as the best response. Dexanabinol administered weekly by intravenous infusion was safe and well-tolerated up to 28 mg/kg in brain cancer patients, but has limited antitumor activity in patients with brain cancer.

1 January 2024 in Neuro-Oncology Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NWNaveed Wagle
Naveed Wagle
ASAkanksha Sharma
Akanksha Sharma
MNMinhdan Nguyen
Minhdan Nguyen
JTJudy Truong
Judy Truong
TJTiffany Marie Juarez
Tiffany Marie Juarez
SKSantosh Kesari
Santosh Kesari
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor with uniformly poor outcomes despite standard upfront chemoradiation with temozolomide and tumor-treating fields.1 Median survival remains under 2 years and more effective treatments are needed. Despite the failure of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) to improve survival for GBM patients in the adjuvant setting (CheckMate-143,2 CheckMate-4983), subgroup analyses of clinical trials suggest there are underlying characteristics of brain cancers that may influence responsiveness to immunotherapy.4–6 Success of ICB in several cancer types and the potential to target malignant cells while sparing normal tissue remain attractive features for continued investigation in GBM. In addition to overcoming the inherent immunosuppressive microenvironment in GBM, the timing of immunotherapy along the treatment course may be an important consideration for glioma susceptibility to immunotherapy, as evidenced by antitumor responses seen in recurrent GBM treated with presurgical neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy.7,8 Furthermore, the addition of chemotherapy or targeted agents to ICB has led to FDA approval in other solid tumors such as nivolumab (anti-PD-1) plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy for the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with resectable non–small cell lung cancer9 and pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) plus lenvatinib (VEGFR kinase inhibiter) in renal cell carcinoma.10