Salvatore Paiella

Prof. Dr. Salvatore Paiella

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 September 2019 in Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RTRosalinda Trovato
Rosalinda Trovato
AFAlessandra Fiore
Alessandra Fiore
SSSara Sartori
Sara Sartori
SCStefania Canè
Stefania Canè
Rosalba GiugnoRosalba Giugno
Rosalba Giugno
SUStefano Ugel
Stefano Ugel
Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly devastating disease with an overall 5-year survival rate of less than 8%. New evidence indicates that PDAC cells release pro-inflammatory metabolites that induce a marked alteration of normal hematopoiesis, favoring the expansion and accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). We report here that PDAC patients show increased levels of both circulating and tumor-infiltrating MDSC-like cells. Methods The frequency of MDSC subsets in the peripheral blood was determined by flow cytometry in three independent cohorts of PDAC patients (total analyzed patients, n = 117). Frequency of circulating MDSCs was correlated with overall survival of PDAC patients. We also analyzed the frequency of tumor-infiltrating MDSC and the immune landscape in fresh biopsies. Purified myeloid cell subsets were tested in vitro for their T-cell suppressive capacity. Results Correlation with clinical data revealed that MDSC frequency was significantly associated with a shorter patients’ overall survival and metastatic disease. However, the immunosuppressive activity of purified MDSCs was detectable only in some patients and mainly limited to the monocytic subset. A transcriptome analysis of the immunosuppressive M-MDSCs highlighted a distinct gene signature in which STAT3 was crucial for monocyte re-programming. Suppressive M-MDSCs can be characterized as circulating STAT3/arginase1-expressing CD14+ cells. Conclusion MDSC analysis aids in defining the immune landscape of PDAC patients for a more appropriate diagnosis, stratification and treatment.

28 February 2015 in Digestive Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SPSalvatore Paiella
Salvatore Paiella
GBGiovanni Butturini
Giovanni Butturini
IFIsabella Frigerio
Isabella Frigerio
RSRoberto Salvia
Roberto Salvia
GAGiulia Armatura
Giulia Armatura
CBClaudio Bassi
Claudio Bassi
Purpose: To evaluate the safety of the NanoKnife Low Energy Direct Current (LEDC) System (Irreversible Electroporation, IRE) in order to treat patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: Prospective, nonrandomized, single-center clinical evaluation of ten patients with a cytohystological diagnosis of unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) that was no further responsive to standard treatments. The primary outcome was the rate of procedure-related abdominal complications. The secondary endpoints included the evaluation of the short-term efficacy of IRE through the evaluation of tumor reduction at imaging and biological tumor response as shown by CA 19-9, clinical assessments and patient quality of life. Results: Ten patients (5 males, 5 females) were enrolled, with a median age of 66 and median tumor size of 30 mm. All patients were treated successfully with a median procedure time of 79.5 min. Two procedure-related complications were described in one patient (10%): a pancreatic abscess with a pancreoduodenal fistula. Three patients had early progression of disease: one patient developed pulmonary metastases 30 days post-IRE and two patients had liver metastases 60 days after the procedure. We registered an overall survival of 7.5 months (range: 2.9-15.9). Conclusions: IRE is a safe procedure in patients with LAPC and may represent a new technological option in the treatment and multimodality management of this disease.

1 March 2021 in Pancreatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCStefano Francesco Crinò
Stefano Francesco Crinò
SASerena Ammendola
Serena Ammendola
AMAnna Meneghetti
Anna Meneghetti
LBLaura Bernardoni
Laura Bernardoni
MBMaria Cristina Conti Bellocchi
Maria Cristina Conti Bellocchi
EMErminia Manfrin
Erminia Manfrin

26 June 2018 in Digestive Endoscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MPMatteo De Pastena
Matteo De Pastena
GMGiovanni Marchegiani
Giovanni Marchegiani
SPSalvatore Paiella
Salvatore Paiella
GMGiuseppe Malleo
Giuseppe Malleo
DCDebora Ciprani
Debora Ciprani
CBClaudio Bassi
Claudio Bassi

1 May 2016 in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPSalvatore Paiella
Salvatore Paiella
MSM. Sandini
M. Sandini
LGL. Gianotti
L. Gianotti
GBG. Butturini
G. Butturini
RSRoberto Salvia
Roberto Salvia
CBC. Bassi
C. Bassi

15 February 2016 in Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPSalvatore Paiella
Salvatore Paiella
RSRoberto Salvia
Roberto Salvia
MRMarco Ramera
Marco Ramera
RGRoberto Girelli
Roberto Girelli
IFIsabella Frigerio
Isabella Frigerio
CBClaudio Bassi
Claudio Bassi
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has still a dismal prognosis. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) accounts for the 40% of the new diagnoses. Current treatment options are based on chemo- and radiotherapy regimens. Local ablative techniques seem to be the future therapeutic option for stage-III patients with PDAC. Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) and Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) are actually the most emerging local ablative techniques used on LAPC. Initial clinical studies on the use of these techniques have already demonstrated encouraging results in terms of safety and feasibility. Unfortunately, few studies on their efficacy are currently available. Even though some reports on the overall survival are encouraging, randomized studies are still required to corroborate these findings. This study provides an up-to-date overview and a thematic summary of the current available evidence on the application of RFA and IRE on PDAC, together with a comparison of the two procedures.