In the recent past, microbiome manipulation has emerged as a promising approach to improve plant growth performance by exploring the deep insight of plant–microbe interactions. The exploration of a plant microbiome either present on an ectosphere or endosphere can provide a far better understanding about the potential application of plant-associated microbes for the improvement of plant growth, protection from pathogen invasion, and tolerance to environmental stresses of a diverse nature. In this context, next-generation sequencing methods, omics approaches, and synthetic biology have made significant progress in plant microbiome research and are being frequently used to explore the intriguing role of plant-associated microorganisms. Despite the successfulness of conventional approaches, the incorporation of CRISPR/Cas9, RNA interference technology, rhizosphere engineering, microbiome engineering, and other manipulation techniques appear to be a promising approach to enhancing plant performance, and tolerance against biotic and abiotic stress factors. The present review presents the significance of plant microbe interaction, vital functional aspects, collaborative action, potential constraints, and finally the latest developments in bioengineering approaches destined for microbiome modulation with an objective to improve the performance of a host plant challenged with environmental stressors.

Nitrate uptake in wheat is an essential and complex process that involves multiple proteins. Roots are the major plant organs that take nitrate molecules from the soil and transport them to the above-ground parts. They involve several high- and low-affinity nitrate transporters located in the plasma membrane of different root and shoot tissues. In the present study, we investigated the responses of different selected wheat genotypes, released in India for different agroclimatic regions in a different year, for their biomass, root traits, and expression of high- and low-affinity nitrate transporters genes under optimal and limiting nitrate conditions at the 14 days seedling stage. The maximum number of genotypes showed increased biomass and total root size (TRS) under nitrate starvation, which indicates that the variation of TRS traits in different genotypes responds differently to nitrate starvation. Gene expression of TaNRT2.1-4 showed up-regulated expression under low external N-concentration in all genotypes. Among the four TaNRT1.1 orthologs, TaNPF6.1 and TaNPF6.4 showed up-regulated expression, whereas TaNPF6.2 and TaNPF6.3 expressed down-regulated in root at higher nitrate concentrations. TaNRT1.1 (TaNPF7.1 and TaNPF7.2) showed up-regulated in root at optimum nitrate concentrations. TaNPF6.1, TaNPF6.4, TaNPF7.1, and TaNPF7.2 showed a typical expression of low-affinity nitrate transporter genes under optimum external N-concentrations. Our findings indicate that HD2967, NP890, and VL804 showed the highest expression of TaNRT2.1-4, TaNRT1.1, and TaNRT1.5, respectively, possibly involved in nitrate uptake and translocation (from root to shoot).