Background and Objectives: Anlotinib, a novel multi-kinase inhibitor targeting angiogenesis and tumor proliferation pathways, has shown promising efficacy in various cancers. Its role in treating thyroid cancer, particularly radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAIR-DTC), medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC), is of significant clinical interest. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Anlotinib in patients with thyroid cancer, analyzing outcomes such as progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rates, and adverse events. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to October 2023. The review included randomized controlled trials and prospective studies assessing Anlotinib in thyroid cancer patients. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers following PRISMA guidelines. Results: Six studies involving a total of 277 patients were included. In patients with RAIR-DTC, Anlotinib demonstrated significant improvement in median PFS and objective response rates. In advanced or metastatic MTC, Anlotinib significantly prolonged median PFS compared to placebo, with high objective response rates. Subgroup analyses showed that older patients and those with bone metastases benefited significantly from Anlotinib treatment. In patients with ATC, Anlotinib-based chemotherapy yielded a 60% objective response rate. Anlotinib was also effective as neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced thyroid cancer, achieving an objective response rate of 76.9%. Common adverse events included hypertension, proteinuria, and palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, which were generally manageable. Conclusions: Anlotinib appears to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with various types of thyroid cancer, providing significant improvements in PFS and objective response rates. Further large-scale randomized studies are warranted to confirm these findings and to explore long-term outcomes.

The escalation of global obesity is driving research to understand environmental influences on this process, particularly during vulnerable developmental stages such as childhood and adolescence. Efforts include the development of various structured data collection tools. We aimed to adapt a series of previously validated questionnaires from the International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment (ISCOLE), the Child Feeding Questionnaire, and elements from the World Health Organization Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative (COSI) in order to assess local lifestyle patterns among Romanian high school students and their families that may predispose them to obesity. To this goal, an expert committee was formed as part of a research partnership to oversee the questionnaire’s translation and adaptation. It consisted of education and school management specialists, clinical research professionals, language experts, and public health experts. The adapted questionnaires were then applied to 114 students enrolled in the 9th and 10th grades attending a high school situated in Sibiu, and their parents. The variables measured were investigated for correlations with overweight and obesity and, as a secondary objective, academic performance. The study revealed several critical findings, including suboptimal sleep durations and physical activity levels among students, a significant amount of screen time, and correlations between weight status and physical activity, sedentary time, and maternal weight status and education levels. The adapted questionnaires proved to be effective tools in capturing the multifaceted factors implicated in adolescent obesity, providing a foundation for targeted interventions and broader public health strategies to address this issue.

The impact of the school environment on childhood weight status has garnered significant attention in recent years. This study aimed to adapt and validate the International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment (ISCOLE) School and Environment questionnaire in order to assess the potential obesogenic impact of school environments in Sibiu County, Romania. The ISCOLE questionnaire was chosen for its rigorous methodology. It was derived from a comprehensive study conducted across 12 countries which aimed to capture multifaceted influences on childhood weight while emphasizing educational settings in the collection of data. To guide the translation and adaptation of the questionnaire, a multidisciplinary committee was assembled which comprised experts in teaching and school administration to ensure target responder relevance, experts in clinical research to ensure methodological robustness, experts in language adaptation to preserve the original intent of the survey, and experts in public health to steer the interpretation of the results, with potential policy implications. The data were analyzed by distinguishing between urban and rural settings, and a two-step cluster analysis was implemented to identify potential intervention targets. To assess the validity of the adapted tool, the questionnaire’s construct validity and internal consistency were explored. A response rate of 71.2% of the approached schools in Sibiu County was achieved. Of the 84 responding school representatives, 37 (44%) were from a rural setting. The rural schools had significantly more limited access to gymnasiums, secured lockers, showers, and bicycle racks, and exhibited more serious problems regarding the inadequate disposal of garbage in the school vicinity. A two-step cluster analysis revealed distinct school categories, providing opportunities for public policy interventions. One of these primarily concerned rural schools with limited infrastructure but with proactive practices and policies which were termed “unable but willing”; on the opposing spectrum, the category “able but unwilling” mainly comprised urban schools which had available facilities but lacked local proactive initiatives. The findings emphasize the urgent need for targeted measures to bridge these discrepancies by investing in infrastructure in rural schools and promoting active school practices and policies in urban settings. The assessment of obesogenic school environments in Sibiu County provides a pilot model for broader applications due to the diverse school landscape and supportive local authorities. The results, which were achieved using low-cost methods, can guide future educational policies, health promotion initiatives, and preventive interventions.

Background: In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), systemic inflammation and routine laboratory parameters may reflect host–tumor interactions and provide additional prognostic information. This study evaluated the association between baseline clinicopathological and laboratory parameters, including the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), and overall survival (OS) in patients with stage IV colorectal adenocarcinoma. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 92 patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma and treated at a single oncology center between February 2022 and December 2024. Baseline laboratory parameters were collected at diagnosis. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier estimates with log-rank testing. Prognostic associations were evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for relevant clinical and treatment-related factors. Results: The cohort was predominantly male (62%) and younger than 70 years (66%), with 80 deaths recorded during follow-up. In univariable analyses, primary tumor resection, irinotecan-based first-line therapy, elevated AST, and dNLR tertiles were associated with OS. However, after multivariable adjustment, only irinotecan-based first-line therapy remained independently associated with poorer survival (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.16–3.81; p = 0.022). Continuous dNLR, anemia (WHO sex-specific), and AST elevation did not retain independent prognostic significance. Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with mCRC, inflammation-related laboratory markers demonstrated associations with survival in unadjusted analyses but did not remain independent predictors after adjustment for clinical and treatment-related confounders. These findings highlight the importance of rigorous multivariable modeling when evaluating inflammatory biomarkers in metastatic colorectal cancer.